User talk:EPicmAx4

EPicmAx4.

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, EPicmAx4! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dreamy Jazz and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:44, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! EPicmAx4, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:44, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Weatherman27. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:2020 Pacific hurricane season that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Even if you disagree with an editor or with what they may be doing, it is not right to attack another editor, as you did by calling CycloneYoris a "moron" 🌀Weatherman27🏈 (Chat|Edits|sandbox) 17:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at 2020 Pacific hurricane season[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the noticeboard. You also seem to be reverting the same article while logged out. See WP:SOCK for why you should avoid that, and why it is risking more severe sanctions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Your recent editing history at Tropical cyclones in 2023 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

The RfC consensus is pretty clear: no more old colored maps, only new maps. Furthermore, inserting old colored maps is against WP:ACCESSIBLE. Therefore you are edit warring against consensus and are liable to be blocked the next time you revert. Because my edit is enforcing consensus it cannot by definition be disruptive, and therefore cannot be WP:POINTY which is titled "Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point" (emphasis mine).--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]