User talk:Dwanyewest/Archive 3
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dwanyewest
Thank you for creating Ignacio Capllonch.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 12:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Les Coulisses de l'exploit moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Les Coulisses de l'exploit, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 07:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Voyage sans passeport moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Voyage sans passeport, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 07:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Trupi dhe Shëndeti moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Trupi dhe Shëndeti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 07:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
La Boîte à sel moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, La Boîte à sel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 08:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:La Tête et les Jambes has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lectures pour tous has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
R E A D I N G Talk to the Beans? 13:07, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Dwanyewest! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
January 2022
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)=
Your submission at Articles for creation: La Tête et les Jambes has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Présence protestante moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Présence protestante, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 02:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Présence protestante has a new comment
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dwanyewest
Thank you for creating A Turma do Balão Mágico (1982 album).
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. IMO this would this would be better covered as a section in the band's article but I marked it reviewed. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 21:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Magazine féminin has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Slywriter (talk) 23:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)September 2022
Hello, I'm PamD. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Pat Davies (footballer), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do not add unsourced birth date information for anyone, but especially not for a living person. Thanks. PamD 09:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- You added a birth date with no source, and which is contradicted in one of the existing sources. Please take more care to add references for everything you add to the encyclopedia. Thanks. PamD 09:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Dwanyewest! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Dwanyewest! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Dwanyewest! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Finnish women footballers
Thanks, Dwanyewest, for writing short bios of women footballers from Finland and covering some of the past Euros. Now that we have lost Lugnuts, we need all the support we can get for women in sports.--Ipigott (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC) =
Please take more care
Hallo, I noticed Sarah Reed (footballer) which you created - I think it was on my watchlist after I had created it as a red link some years back. You left it in this state. Please take more care to make sure that your edits are accurate. You said "Reed greatest achievement was scoring the winning the 1998 FA Women's Cup Final and 1999 FA Women's Cup Final with Arsenal": it doesn't make sense, but it seems to be trying to say that she scored the winning goals, which isn't supported by either of the sources: she was the goalkeeper. Please try to be accurate.
Please also remember to make the first mention of the subject in the lead bold, and also remember to make sure that if you create an article with a disambiguated title it can be found from the basic title: in this case it needed to be added to the disambiguation page at Sarah Reed (I've done so). Without that, the reader is unlikely to find the article, and a future careless editor might create a duplicate article. Thanks. PamD 20:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: La Boîte à sel has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Lewolka (talk) 18:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)"Anti white racism" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti white racism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 4#Anti white racism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Noora Matikainen has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary (talk) 07:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Heidi Lindström has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary (talk) 07:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dwanyewest. Thank you for your work on Petra Häkkinen. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Présence protestante has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Onel5969 TT me 21:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Tone Røst Heimlund has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
97198 (talk) 06:40, 21 November 2022 (UTC)ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dwanyewest. Thank you for your work on 2002 FA Women's Community Shield. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 20:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Dwanyewest!
Dwanyewest,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 05:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 05:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dwanyewest. Thank you for your work on 2003 FA Women's Community Shield. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 20:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: List of foreign Frauen-Bundesliga players has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Labour relations in women's association football has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Seany91 (talk) 00:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dwanyewest. Thank you for your work on Judith Corominas. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:13, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dwanyewest. Thank you for your work on De Gaulle à la plage. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Igor Barrère has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
S0091 (talk) 15:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Redirect targets
Hi Dwanyewest, when creating a redirect for a subtopic please help make it more useful to the reader by using the most relevant target available, such as redirecting to the relevant section. Adding a redirect category tag is also useful to Wkipedia's maintenance volunteers. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 06:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Darcy McFarlane has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Seany91 (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Arrate Guisasola has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Seany91 (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Anna Margraf
Hi, may I just ask, the version of Anna Margraf you just created seems completely acceptable to me. As far as I remember, I saw the same version (wame sources) a few weeks ago in NPP as well, but I see now that it was G4 deleted by User:Joe Roe, who then gave you, er, no useful explanation at all when you challenged the deletion. If this is indeed basically the same article as the one that was deleted, then that was a completely incorrect G4 deletion by Joe Roe. Next time something like this happens, after you have contacted the deleting admin, it would be best if you brought it to WP:DRV for a discussion, as some admins don't take it lightly when a speedy deletion is basically ignored by recreating the page. Having such DRV discussions also helps in establishing whether an admin has simply made a mistake, or if they are part of a pattern of problematic deletions. Fram (talk) 09:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dwanyewest. Thank you for your work on Bjørg Storhaug. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:
Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Lara Esponda
I expanded Lara Esponda because of this conversation: Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Special_occasion_idea:_Women's_World_Cup. I have also nominated it for a DYK, Template:Did you know nominations/Lara Esponda. Please feel free to correct my mistakes. --evrik (talk) 21:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Chiara Singarella
If you expand Chiara Singarella soon, nominate it for a DYK and notify the editors at Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Special_occasion_idea:_Women's_World_Cup. --evrik (talk) 21:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Lara Esponda
On 24 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lara Esponda, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at age 14, footballer Lara Esponda was the youngest goalkeeper to debut in the top division of women's football in Argentina? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lara Esponda. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lara Esponda), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Just a reminder...
Every time you create an article, please remember to bold the subject in the lede like this: Football Player → '''Football Player''' (three apostrophes on each side) → Football Player. That way, it'll save you and other editors/patrollers a lot of time and effort. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Ways to improve Lauren Curtin
Hello, Dwanyewest,
Thank you for creating Lauren Curtin.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This is a good start; I think her sister's (Cara Curtin) page could be a good resource for additional sources
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Smasongarrison}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Mason (talk) 02:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for creating biographies of women athletes!
Hello, Dwanyewest -- Thank you for creating so many biographies for women athletes! As you move continue creating biographies, could you do the following tasks:
- 1) Bold the article subject as Slgrandson noted previously, e.g., Dwanyewest is a Wikipedian.
- 2) Add {{Authority control}} beneath the references.
- 3) Add {{DEFAULSORT:Lastname, Firstname}} beneath authority control, e.g., {{DEFAULTSORT:West, Dwanye}}.
- 4) Add a short description that provides a super brief description, often from the first sentence, e.g., {{short description|Retired American soccer player}}.
Further, if you could create articles beyond stubs, that would be great, too. However, I think even stubs are valuable! Thanks again for all your work! Significa liberdade (talk) 19:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- I would like to second that motion. Please, if you could create something more meaningful than one-sentence stubs, we could have such a cool encyclopedia. Also, Wikipedia is not just a collection of information, so be careful about which articles you create. Paul Vaurie (talk) 01:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Ways to improve Tracey Milburn
Hello, Dwanyewest,
Thank you for creating Tracey Milburn.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
We require a few more sources discussing the individual. There appear to be some in Google, from when she played out in Los Angeles.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Oaktree b}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Oaktree b (talk) 21:15, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop
Hello Dwanyewest. I understand you're trying to do the right thing and improve Wikipedia, but making one-sentence, barely notable stubs without writing any meaningful content is not a constructive improvement to Wikipedia. These articles you just created: Jennifer Soileau, Erin Regan, Beth Zotter, Erica Iverson, Emmy Barr; they're all the same. "So and so is a retired American soccer player in the WUSA. WP:REFBOMB."
None of the articles you're making comply with the guidelines for player articles outlined at WP:WPF. Most of the articles you are making have little information, and most fail WP:GNG according to my interpretation.
I would appreciate if you actually put some time and effort into your article creation, because writing one single sentence and then adding just a REFBOMB is not helpful. It just creates more work for other people to clean up. Please remember quality over quantity. Happy editing. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- I would have to agree, the mass-creation of stubs is not of much use to this site when there is no prose indicating the subjects' notability. One-sentence articles with no biographical details is also not useful for readers. I've created such articles before as well, but have come to realize that spending time to create quality articles is of far greater benefit to Wikipedia. Cheers, S.A. Julio (talk) 04:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Felicia Schroeder
On 26 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Felicia Schroeder, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Felicia Schroeder signed to play soccer for the University of South Carolina, the school did not have a sign-language interpreter available for her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Felicia Schroeder. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Felicia Schroeder), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 12:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Better articles
Hello Dwanyewest. As I have stated before, could you please make better articles than this? One-sentence stubs with barely any context just make more work for other editors. It is not a contest to make the most articles. Wikipedia is not a competition. Thank you. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Also, could you please develop the infobox of player articles you make? See examples of infoboxes at Lionel Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo, for example. They display the clubs that a particular player has played for. You don't do that, and that just creates more work for other editors. Please complete the infobox. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:04, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelsey Dossey has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Superboilles (talk) 19:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dwanyewest. Thank you for your work on Tracey Milburn. User:Oaktree b, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Would likely be notable, but we need much more than what's given in the article now. Appears to have played in LA with some sources from the 1990's found. I'd add those to the article, which would likely help. PM if you need help locating them!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Oaktree b}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Oaktree b (talk) 21:16, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomo Matsukawa has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Paul Vaurie (talk) 01:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmy Barr has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Seany91 (talk) 10:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Taru Laihanen has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Seany91 (talk) 10:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Betsy Barr has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Seany91 (talk) 10:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Vicky Johnson has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Seany91 (talk) 10:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)