User talk:Dusti/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 → Archive 10

I have to bail

I hate to do this, but I feel I have to bail out on adopting you. I'm still swamped at work, with no let up in sight, and a couple of good friends in real life are going through crises and need me around, so wikipedia won't be a top priority for a while. You've got the basics down, and I know you'll be in good hands with Keeper and Rlevse to guide you.--Fabrictramp (talk) 00:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply to question on recent event

Sorry I did not get back to you quicker, I missed your question on my talk page for some reason. I have reviewed what happened over your rollback rights and the obvious conclusion I can draw is only use rollback for vandalism and your own edits - don't use it for anything else, it just isn't worth it. If you need to do a revert outside this area, use another method with an appropriate edit summary, or take an alternative action. Don't hesitate to report to WP:AN3 when edit warring is happening, it is busy but there a lot of admins watching and you should get results reasonably quickly. WP:AIV is useful but it is only for when a block is needed immediately (meaning the reported user should have edited within the last 15 minutes, 30 at most) to stop obvious (to nearly anyone) vandalism and spam. WP:ATWV gives a short but clear insight into what vandalism is supposed to be, WP:V is more detailed. Content dispute edit wars, although disruptive is not a form of vandalism. I don't think B was being unreasonable when he removed your rollback rights, though I am glad you did well in responding to the removal and successfully got it back, as you should have done. It is important for when you (assuming you are still planning to) request adminship you have shown you can use the rollback tool correctly - as you will have this, plus other more powerful tools at your disposal. Camaron | Chris (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Offer

Hi Dusti. I would like to take up your offer on my Editor Review, I really think I could benefit from your guidance. --FGWQPR (talk) 19:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Sir, you removed a section supported by 13 sources

[1]

Do you really think that´s a good edit?. Randroide (talk) 21:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I stand by the edit because it is pure speculation. There is no definate material there that someone can use. It wasn't in violation of NPOV, but maybe it can be rewritten so that someone can use it for their benifit. Does what I'm saying make sense? Dusticomplain/compliment 21:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
NO. It doesn´t make sense at all. Please paste your answer at Talk:Controversies_about_the_2004_Madrid_train_bombings#.22Speculation.22 and lets talk there. Thank you. Randroide (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Rewrite on Madrid Bombings Section

Hi, I think it's fairly clear that Randroide isn't going to agree to our compromise proposal. I propose to proceed with the rewrite of the section anyway, I'll just have to do it offline as best I can. We'll see whether anyone comments on his RFC but it's not a reason in itself to hold up the rewriting of the section. Southofwatford (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your notes at WP:RPP

If you see edit-warring, feel free to leave {{subst:uw-3rr}} ~~~~ at the relevant talk pages. I warned four of the users you mentioned as having edit-warred. Enigma message Review 18:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Guess I could at least warn them huh? Are the comments that I am leaving constructive? Or would I be best to just watch what happens? Dusticomplain/compliment 18:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
It helps the admins to leave a note regarding what you think of the situation. Unfortunately, today RPP was neglected. You can't protect pages or block abusive users, but you can warn them. That's what I recommend for the future. I found your comments there to be generally helpful. The admin I buzzed did not feel that Christmas warranted indef semi-protection, however. Cheers, Enigma message Review 18:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

William Gaillard

Message received and understood. I have entered into discussions since a vandal was banned and a user immediately jumped on the article. I have reported the IP vandal and they were banned. I have sought page protection from non-registered users. I have also informed the wikiproject:football community of the attention the William Gaillard article is receiving. I shall take any warning under advisement though.Londo06 19:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Just keeping a fellow editor from getting into trouble :) Dusticomplain/compliment 19:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Cheers fellaLondo06 21:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

You reversion of my edit

I was removing irrelevant clutter. If you think a table which is not mentioned in the article and has nothing to do with the article should remain there, I'd be interested to here you reasoning. Misodoctakleidist (talk) 18:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

It shows an example, and in my opinion, the table isn't really clutter in the article. If you wish to have it removed, go ahead. I saw a large amount of text removed and assumed vandalism. Dusticomplain/compliment 18:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
It shows an example of a completely different notation system which has it's own article. Misodoctakleidist (talk) 18:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
I see that you have already reverted my change. I apologize, happy editing! Dusticomplain/compliment

my edits to Turkish people

Excuse me, could you please explain to me why you reverted my edits to Turkish people? I was only removing material from unreliable sources in good faith. --Tsourkpk (talk) 20:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I saw that you had removed a large amount of text, assumed vandalism, and used the Rollback tool. I apologize for any inconvienence or misunderstanding. Thanks and happy editing. Dusticomplain/compliment 20:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
An unfortunate accident. Thanks. --Tsourkpk (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 17 21 April 2008 About the Signpost
BLP deletion rules discussed amidst controversial AFD Threat made against high school on Wikipedia, student arrested 
Global login, blocking features developed WikiWorld: "Disruptive technology" 
News and notes: Wikimania security, German print Wikipedia, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Monthly updates of styleguide and policy changes WikiProject Report: The Simpsons 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Archive problems and editor review

Your archive seems to be functioning alright to me, you can let me know if you have any more problems. I saw your message to EVula (talk · contribs), I don't think it is currently possible to start an archive automatically every 2 months - if you want to do that, you may have to do it manually, as I do. I see you were involved in a incident with Blackzeppelin (talk · contribs) - while this user is clearly not a vandal s/he did not help him/herself by not using edit summaries, I have posted a comment on his/her talk page suggesting that s/he uses them in future. I noticed this user also posted a comment on your editor review - and that you are considering removing it. While I think the comments were very critical and lacked foundation, they were not a personal attack or incivil - I have seen many similar comments posted on RfAs. I would recommend you leave the comment - or move it to this talk page on the grounds it is about one incident, and not really a review. I have noticed your review is no longer on WP:ER as it is quite old now, you may wish to declare it closed. You can do his by simply leaving a note on the review and/or removing the request for reviews on your user/user talk pages. You can eventually start a brand new review at Wikipedia:Editor review/Dustihowe 2. Camaron | Chris (talk) 14:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the article Kantri

The individual who you recently warned for vandalism to the article Kantri hasn't stopped. I've reverted his edits 2 more times. Please take the next level of action against him --Ram Astra (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

HMT Southland

Please remove the speedy deletion template. The article is going to be edited to start class--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 11:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Yönetici

Yönetici yönetici yönetici

Reverting me @ Gold rush

Hello, firstly, I am not new here - I am registered as user:YemeniteCamel for quite some time, and I've been editing in the Hebrew Wikipedia for over a year. Secondly, the article Gold rush is supposed to be shown first in Category:Gold rushes, as it is the main article about it. This is done in Chelsea FC as well - see how it is categorized down there. That article is categorized like this: [[category:Chelsea F.C.| ]]. הגמל התימני (talk) 15:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Jbrown 932

The user was reported at WP:AIV with a comment "actions indicate a vandalism-only account"; when I checked one of his edits, I hit just the one where he replaced "Hunt" with "cunt" in a number of places, so I trusted the reporting user and didn't check any further. Now I re-checked his edits, and reduced the block to a week. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

In regards to the Pisces Iscariot article.

Uh, what exactly was the warning for? What was incorrect about my information, I didn't add any new information, I just changed how it looked. Not only that, I DID discuss on the talkpage that I was going to change the tracklisting format, so why did you revert it? Please revert it back. Pasta of Muppets (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

It seems to me that you removed a lot of text, that is the reason I reverted what appears to be vandalism. Can you explain? DustiSPEAK!! 02:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
So in your eyes, does it? I'm kind of insulted that responding to a template such as this one,
specifically the "improve this article if you can" part, is regarded in that way.
If you want an explanation that isn't sarcastic or time-wasting, here it is: The text I removed was already mentioned in the section, specifically, the credits, cover song info, etc... So I saw no reason for it to be there. I was complying with Wikipedia:Manual of Style and WP:Albums, jeez, what WASN'T I complying with...
I don't see any reason why it should of been reverted.
I seriously suggest/recommend you undo your revert. Pasta of Muppets (talk) 03:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your cooperation. Pasta of Muppets (talk) 04:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

video

Well, the telly is rubbish tonight anyway so it can only be an improvement.:) Sticky Parkin 23:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

:D I'm lovin it.....DustiSPEAK!! 23:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

On your talkpage for a change :-)

Hey Dusti, I saw your apology, and think that you did just fine. Keep in mind though that an "apology" shouldn't have conditions or exceptions. It should really be "just an apology". You did good though by adding that extra post to Udonknome's talkpage. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Careful here keep, you might hit 100. :) Thanks, you dont know what it took to do that though.....DustiSPEAK!! 00:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
You know I love you babe. Thanks for apologizing. One of the key traits of admins/admin candidates is their ability to apologize for their actions. Whether you are right or wrong (in this case, unfortunately, you were wrong), it is essential that you recognize that apologizing for your actions is the first and most important step to de-escalating a dispute in order to help everyone move along towards building a better encyclopedia. BTW, I'm looking forward to breaking 100, you are an excellent, dedicated editor, and I feel privileged to be able to work with you towards becoming an even better one! (admin or not!) Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
You just put a smile on my face Keep, thank you. If you weren't an Admin, I would so nominate you right now.....:). DustiSPEAK!! 00:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
No problem my friend. Just looking at your diffs, it's obvious you've had a rough day. I'm going offline in a few minutes (hopefully) and thought that you needed some encouragement. I meant every word I said there -- have a nice evening/night, and keep up the good work! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I'll be on here for awhile, gotta get something done today :-). DustiSPEAK!! 00:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Article expansion break

How 'bout improving an article from stubclass to B class? That would impress me. :-) I'm going home now, offline til tomorrow. See you AM ---- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 01:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

That sounds like fun :(.....but then again....hmmm DustiSPEAK!! 01:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I have no shortage of articles you could help me expand, if ou want Dusti. I miss my citation tool. It's so hard to write articles from my laptop now. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 01:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Leave me a couple and any ideas as to where to start below? I'm offline for a few but I'll be back. DustiSPEAK!! 01:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Waaaay too much indenting. I have a couple of topics: museums, international culture and some other stuff I found in the backlog. Give me a general idea of your interests and I'm happy to toss a few your way. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 15:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
OK here are a couple, some geographic because I don't know too much about your interests. Some are random. Feel free to tell me if you'd like different suggestions:
 Done Indiana University Art Museum - bad sign when the infobox is bigger than the article. Easy to expand 5x and you might get a DYK from it.
I've expanded the article some, but after doing a google search, there just doesn't seem to be that much information out there. DustiSPEAK!! 20:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Dusti, you've got e-mail on this. In the mean time this might help you some. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 20:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Thoughts? TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 18:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Block of User:Cardiff123098

Fair enough. I'll unblock him (sorry about the delay, I went off-wiki just before you left me the message). But please make sure he stops with the nonsense edits: he's doing that on high-traffic articles so it will be caught but that same kind of vandalism on articles that aren't sufficiently watchlisted can remain for a while and is quite damaging. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 01:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll try and see what I can do with him....*Deep breath*....DustiSPEAK!! 01:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Adoptee

Nope, he hasn't been around much at all. Haven't talked to him. xenocidic (talk) 01:34, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I havent been around for a while as I have many much more important things to deal with for the moment. If all goes well I should be on by the end of next month more reguarly. --FGWQPR (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Glad to hear from ya! I was getting ready to send out a Search and Rescue team for you :). Let us know if you need anything. DustiSPEAK!! 15:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Same here, I hope all is well. xenocidic (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

You, sir, are a saint

Your most recent act of benevolence. Seriously, I see a lot of potential in him too. I'm chalking most of his problematic edits up to youth, inexperience, and enthusiasm. I would've edited similarly at that stage of my life if Wikipedia had been around in its present form then. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Adopter

I got your message. Is there a policy somewhere regarding this so I have a better understanding of it? --Jagz (talk) 14:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

your question

Which edit summary are you asking about? Tvoz/talk 23:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, ok - the edits were made by FYW09 (talk · contribs · logs), who has been identified as a sockpuppet of the banned user Dereks1x (talk · contribs · logs). Banned users are not allowed to edit under any account disguises, and their edits are to be reverted. Was there a problem? Cheers Tvoz/talk 23:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

not vandalism

You misjudged my edit to the page Henrietta FitzJames as vandalism. It wasn't... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.235.121 (talk) 00:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Agree, and I've reverted your edit. In what possible way were this series of edits "disruptive editing"? – iridescent 00:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


you misjudged mine as well you said disruptive comments you liberals should stay north of the ohio river —Preceding unsigned comment added by Featherhawk 81 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD closure

Hey Dusti. You're doing some great work I see. I just wanted to offer a word of caution about closing AfDs. As a non-admin, I would have waited for an admin to close this one. Even when the nominator says "withdrawn", if there were many "delete" !votes as there were here, it could be potentially controversial to close it as "keep". I think this was the correct result, though (I said "keep" myself). Also I fixed up the formatting on your closure; hope you don't mind. Happy editing! Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I just noticed that Keeper said it was a good close. Sorry, then—I'll trust Keeper. Feel free to ignore my comment. :) Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
You mean that there were some weak, stale "deletes" in there? :) Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD script?

Hey Dusti, I saw here that you used to use an AfD script. Although it stopped working for you, would you mind telling me its name or linking it? I'd like to look into it. Thanks and TGIF! TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 01:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Unfortunately I haven't the foggiest how to use or install it but I'll learn. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 01:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Put it in your monobook here. Then bypass your browser, depends on the type. Once you go to AFD's, you should see a close tab above. This is the condensed version, hope it helps :).
Installed it, but doesn't appear to work for me either :( thanks for helping TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 04:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/oren0

Dusti, I was looking through the recent RfAs and notice this vote of yours. I have to say, it concerns me for a few reasons (not because of the AfD typo, I see you fixed that). Would you mind explaining the basis of that vote, the reasoning behind it, and why you suggested the candidate withdraw? Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 22:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I would be more than happy to. I based my !vote on the foundation that very few RFA's succeed with as low edit summary and main space editing that oren0 had. I don't see the RFA ending successfully and I felt that it would better for him/her to withdraw and instead go with an Editor Review, and then come back to RFA in a few months, with an improved edit summary useage and more mainspace edits. That was the largest part behind my comment. DustiSPEAK!! 22:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
What is wrong with his mainspace editing? Several admins have passed with much less, hell, Keeper did. Dusti, the reason I came here is because I think you need to understand that the "moral support" you gave, with suggestion of withdrawal, did much more damage to that candidacy than an oppose. It sort of sets a precedent that supports will be for moral reasons. Further, in a case like this where there is a real candidate who isnt SNOW or NOTNOW, its improper to suggest withdrawal and make a blanket statement that the RfA will fail (or be "closed", as you put it). It was, and still is, a very confusing position for someone to take, and considering how reasonable I know you are when it comes to discussing thing, I thought I'd press you on this. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 22:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
See, I'm in a position where I try and be fair with each RFA. I wasn't exactly sure how the RFA would go, so I gave moral support....I'm not really too sure how I feel about the oren0 at this point. DustiSPEAK!! 22:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
I know you are trying to be fair, that's why I thought I'd discuss this with you. Believe me, I didn't come here to sway your vote. It's that we should be careful when making statements about the outcome of the RfA so early on in one, specifically for a candidate that has a real chance of passing. If you are going to suggest a candidate withdraw that early, and say it will fail that early, you need very specific reasons for your statements. I know you are becoming more active in RfA voting, but his mainspace editing isnt in SNOW territory, and edit summary usage has become a very minor sidepoint for whether or not to support a candidate. So, maybe just to wrap this up, I'm advising to avoid discussing the RfA outcome when its really not certain whatsoever. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 22:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Ok, and I'm going to make a quick visit to that RFA.....DustiSPEAK!! 22:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Dusti, I've added my support to that RfA. I think you should read what I wrote in support (I came here to do exactly what Gwynand did, which was to ask you for clarification of your !vote that you have now struck). I was about a week away from nominating him. He didn't know that, but the diffs from my userspace that I made last week prove it. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Adoption offer

Hi! Thanks for your offer! Yes, I would like to be your adoptee. I don't know how active I'll be right away, but as my project at work picks up I'm sure I'll have more questions.Sam@work ҉ (talk) 16:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I will set up an adoption page for you and will be online around 2PM my time (its 1PM now...I gotta go to lunch). DustiSPEAK!! 16:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Wandsworth Parks Police article vandalism

Hello, I noticed you reverting an edit on this article. It would appear that someone is arbitarilt deleting my cited claims regarding the article and I've not even touched the main article page! Any ideas about what I can do to prevent this vandalism. (Bit green with Wikipedia) Thanks Dibble999 (talk) 15:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Remember this firstly, and secondly you can always ask for a 3rd Opinion or if you feel that the other editor has been vandalizing Wikipedia, you can take it to an Administrator, the Administrator Noticeboard, or report the editor here. DustiSPEAK!! 15:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated this article for deletion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wandsworth Parks Police. You may wish to comment on this AFD. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider

attack

Sorry for the AFD and bad move, I am interested in the wikipedia Mark Bellinghaus and the off-wiki one too but understand if other editors aren't wanting this to be raked again. Roger Blitzen (talk) 15:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Edit war

Hi Dusti. The edit war stopped some time ago with Cielo filing a request at WP:Third Opinion. As far as I know, we're just waiting for someone else to offer their view, which seems like a reasonable course of action. Additionally, please don't template the regulars... I'm not angry or anything but if you read the associated page it explains it pretty well. Cheers! Nobody of Consequence (talk) 16:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Morgan Jackson-King has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. DustiSPEAK!! 20:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Did you just warn yerself? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Somehow I did, I think I'm losing my mind. Lol, this one has to stay though :) DustiSPEAK!! 20:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

About Micheal Raegan

The thing about Michael Reagan, it is NOT "unreferenced controversial biographical content" as you stated. Listen to it yourself: http://youtube.com/watch?v=NWxEyplLzRk Why do you give me warnings for that?

ampalaya

Editors can sometimes seem a bit overzealous, what with all their duties. Relax. The info I added on ampalaya is not ‘unconstructive’ or ‘impertinent’ by any stretch of the imagination. If you can develop a consensus of users/editors who feel it is impertinent, then I will accede to it's deletion. In the meanwhile, I will reinstate it. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.71.223 (talk) 22:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar!! How you been lately? CTF83! 00:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Throwing notices

You don't send warnings for anyone for reverting once. Do consider checking the article history before throwing in warnings to regular editors. Please be careful the next time else I would start a thread at ANI about severe abuse of editing privelages. ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 16:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Severe abuse of editing privileges? I suggest looking up 3RR. You don't have to have 3 edits m'dear - You've joined in an edit war. Take it to the talk page on the article and don't try to team up against the IP. You're more than welcome to start a thread at AN/I if you wish. Dusti*poke* 16:59, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
You don't give a high level warning to any one for one revert. The user must have atleast 2 revert to warrant one. I pretty well know 3 edits aren't necessary, but 1 is not an error... ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 17:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
There are four reverts between yourself, the IP, and Uncletomwood. All three of you should actually get a warning. You know better than to engage in an edit war, or at least you should. It's not a "High Level Warning" - or at least I don't view it as such. Sometimes you simply need a reminder to take the dispute to the talk page - and as such, that's what you're going to do, right? :) Dusti*poke* 17:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
It is a high level warning....you dont need to template me for it. A simple talk message should suffice. I didn't even plan to revert the second time and that notice is really not what I expected! Reminders need not be templates ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 17:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
It sounds like you're not upset really for the message, but for the fact that you feel like you were issued a "severe warning" and that you're in some sort of trouble, which isn't the case. You were merely poked and reminded to take the dispute to the talk page. The fact that you are (or were) in an edit war is indisputable. In any sense, you are aware of the issue now and you can take it up with Uncletomwood and the IP on the article's talk page. Have a great day :) Dusti*poke* 17:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't really mind if you left a soft message on my talk..but I felt the warning was too much for it..considering I made a single edit to the article.....it's unfortunate that I get templared for making a single revert. ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 17:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200.

Would you help with this page Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 10:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Absolutely! I'll check it out and do what I can! Dusti*poke* 16:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
The page has been proded. Heard the phrase for the first time from you. Hope the page stays. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Reply

I have no idea what that was about. I didn't do it. My two year old godson had my iPad the other day and I was logged into Wikipedia, I think he may have done it. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 17:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Location of conversation on User talk:Anonymous209.6

Shouldn't I just move that to another thread on that board? It seems like the major issue is POV pushing. I don't care, I am just asking.Casprings (talk) 00:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

If the issue you want to bring forth is POV, then you can move it to a new thread. If you want to report it for WP:3RR, then that's the appropriate board :) Dusti*poke* 00:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


Sorry about that removal. Nothing I meant to do.Casprings (talk) 01:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

It's fine :) Comes up with Edit Conflicts sometimes. Dusti*poke* 01:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you take a look at this user?

IP user 66.3.28.165 keeps removing links to a specific website from articles. I am not sure if these removals are legitimate but wanted a second opinion before doing anything Andrew Kurish (talk) 00:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

That is strange, as he's only going after one link it appears (though the link is to the same site, just different locations). I'm not quite sure if I'd classify it as vandalism as a "Tour Agency" isn't necessarily a good external link to have because it's spammish. I'll watch the user and see if anything comes of it, and I'll drop them a line. Dusti*poke* 00:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dusti. You have new messages at Talk:Right to die.
Message added 16:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

–Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Alexander_(tennis)?diff=561919028

There is no credible evidence that this statement is true. Indeed the entire Politics section appears to be have been written by someone who is likely to be a John Alexander supporter - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Alexander_(tennis)&oldid=525689403

The sections regarding table tennis have little to no significance in the context of Australian politics.

Darkmoon Ritual

Hello., since you appear to have edited the Darkmoon Ritual page before, would you care to comment on the article's proposed deletion? Thanks. NHCLS (talk) 18:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

thanks

BTW, I have found that understating a point on my part frequently is stronger than me overstating it <g>. Thanks. Collect (talk) 06:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Just to check...

...in reference to the WP:CBAN suggestion. I'm inexperienced at this; do you have any suggestions? MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

It gets tricky I believe. Let me research it today, and I'll see what I can figure out. Dusti*poke* 15:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Mezzo, I spent some time researching what to do from here, and with some help from TParis, basically what we do from here is approach WP:AN and say "Look, we tried to talk to this user about their issues in this topic area and they refused to discuss. We think they just need to stick out of the topic area for 6 months." or whatever consensus we come to in the RFC. Dusti*poke* 02:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
And point to the RFC and provide the diffs as well.--v/r - TP 02:56, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey Dusti

Hey Dusti, its KC, wondering how you have been. Been a really long time, wondering if your interested in talking again? It would be fun to catch up...MaskedHero (talk) 22:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

How's life treating KC? Dusti*poke* 22:28, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Life's good, interested in talking on the phone? Ill email u my # MaskedHero (talk) 22:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm actually in Canada - but I'm on IRC and email lol :) Dusti*poke* 22:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

The fine art of thanking...

Hi Dusti, first time we've crossed paths. Thanking is new. Click "View History" for any page. After the "Undo" link for each revision entry, there is now a "Thank" link that follows. The link is also available when reviewing any diff as well. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 06:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

IP edit

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Alexander_(tennis)?diff=561919028

There is no credible evidence that this statement is true. Indeed the entire Politics section appears to be have been written by someone who is likely to be a John Alexander supporter - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Alexander_(tennis)&oldid=525689403

The sections regarding table tennis have little to no significance in the context of Australian politics. -- 00:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

tags

can you stop tagging me?? Baboon43 (talk) 06:28, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

New Section

Link on portrait paintings leads to unimportant material i consider it is worth deletion or replacement to worthy links /postmodernart555

Edit warring because you think something is better is not the solution. Try discussing it on the talk page. Dusti*poke* 01:06, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Why should I? Is it worth discussion to Find out Velazquez more important link?
Because continuing to edit war on the article may get you blocked. We value collaboration, not someone's singular point of view. In the future, please sign all of your posts with ~~~~ to allow others to know who made which comment. Dusti*poke* 01:15, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I just started, i don't see anyone discussing at the talk page -postmodernart555
Most editors are volunteers, and thus it may be a bit before someone replies to you. When it becomes obvious that there's an issue with an edit, or someone reverts you, don't get into an edit war with them. It looks like Vandalism to individuals like myself who use tools to remove such edits. Take it to a talk page, or message the editor who reverted your edit. Remember, we don't own the articles we edit. (You forgot to sign your post with four tildas. It's important you do that! :) ) Dusti*poke* 01:48, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

They delete my input from TALK pages, it seems like this site not very welcoming to any new people or conversation. i'm terrifyed someone calls my edits vandalism, read it before you act!!! talk

SuGui Kriss

Thanks for your review, but one question, how come the infobox in this article reads 25-26, when it suppose to give the exact persons age? SuGui Kriss--Mishae (talk) 01:56, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

That is actually weird. It could be the wiki software because today/yesterday was/is her birthday. Dusti*poke* 02:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia edit history it is the 8th right now. Shouldn't be a problem...--Mishae (talk) 02:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Right, however, EST it's the 7th. I'm really not sure. It appears to be auto-calculated, as I went to edit the page and I don't see her actual age being listed, yet calculated by the date of birth. Dusti*poke* 02:05, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Another thing, maybe its my inexperience, but why do I see only month and year but not the date when it comes to people infoboxes? Like shouldn't it appear as July 6, 1987 (25)?--Mishae (talk) 02:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I believe that'd come down to the fact that we have her full birth date. Some notable individuals we only know their month/year. Being an encyclopedia having full information is more beneficial in my opinion. Though, I didn't create the article, I just patrolled it. Dusti*poke* 02:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Removing relisted deletion notice

I removed a relisted deletion notice that can be seen here: [2] The notice stated "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it." I removed the notice, explaining why I did so. Soon afterwards, a bot relisted the notice and I received a message on my talk page here: [3] What do I do wrong? In my perception, I did what the deletion notice stated by removing the message and expalining why I do so in the edit summary. David O. Johnson (talk) 04:48, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

HI David! Thanks for coming to me and asking for help! What appears to have happened is a user nominated the article for deletion and then placed what's called a PROD tag on the article which is actually inappropriate. It appears when you went to remove the PROD tag, you also removed the AfD template. The PROD tag should have never been placed on the article, as it's being considered for deletion still. The situation seems to have worked itself out now, but that's what happened. Does that help? Dusti*poke* 04:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation; so the notice should be left there, right? I recall that it was relisted in order to reach consensus. Thanks again. David O. Johnson (talk) 05:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

You are correct! Discussions run for seven days, and if there's no discussion, they can be relisted up to two times. Dusti*poke* 05:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Heads up- Incorrect Reversion

Hey, I just wanted to give you a heads up- when you performed this edit reversion, you reverted the page back to an incorrect version. I have made the necessary corrections, I just wanted to let you know. Have a good one!  :-) Oh, and btw, I love the Margaret Mead quote on your user page. -Nutiketaiel (talk) 03:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Mike Halfacre

I replied to your comments on the Mike Halfacre AfD page. DavidinNJ (talk) 22:51, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

DRN needs your help!

Hi there. I've noticed it's been a while since you've been active at DRN, and we could really use your help! DRN is going to undergo some changes soon, so it'd really be great if our backlog is cleared before the start of August and we have as many people on board to help with the changes (they include a move to subpages and the creation of a rotating "co-ordinator" role to help manage things day-to-day. Hope to see you soon! Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 11:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Request for removing deletion tag in my article.

Hi there, I have added more reference to my article Nepal (magazine) which you have placed tag of deletion. Can you review this ? Thanks Ashishlohorung (talk) 02:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

The problem with them is that they're not independent reliable sources. Dusti*Let's talk!* 02:46, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Liberal Democratic Party of Russia/Political Party LDPR

The party renamed itself from the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia to the Political Party LDPR. The original shortname was moved and changed, however this causes it's name to appear incorrect on the pages for elections before the change. 24.121.215.171 (talk) 04:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

The page you are attempting to edit is a redirect to another article. That information should be placed on that article. Dusti*Let's talk!* 04:19, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
What it is redirecting to isn't an article! It is a shortname template. Or is there a method of using both names in a single template that I"m not aware of? 24.121.215.171 (talk) 04:23, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
You'll need to ask this user, as they redirected the page. Dusti*Let's talk!* 04:26, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

You made a mistake

So, Wallace Fard Muhammad's occupation was "God", and not "minister"? This guy was God himself? I was reverting some vandalism and you reverted my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.180.138 (talk) 04:36, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Good job catching that! I've reverted myself to your edit. It looks like we were both trying to undo that specific edit :) Dusti*Let's talk!* 04:38, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

File:COMPANY PRODUCT LOGO.png

Speedy request - The file is not on en-wiki - it's on commons.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

My edit on the page of "The First Doctor" - Talkback

Hi, I noticed you deleted my addition because of a lack of citation, but 1) neither Hartnell or Hurndall have citations attached to their names and 2) going to David Bradley's page reveals that he will be starring as the first doctor. Thus, I don't see the reason for a citation--especially on that section of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.95.180.32 (talk) 01:45, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Umbilical venous catheterisation

Hello, Dusti. You have new messages at Diptanshu.D's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DiptanshuTalk 02:56, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Instead of leaving the fate of the page to others, I think that you can directly intervene so that I can proceed with the editing on the respective page. I was planning to enhance the Wikipedia article on the topic irrespective of the location of the page. I have already expressed my views on the talk page of the new and alleged article. DiptanshuTalk 03:06, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

AN case

I wish to inform you that a case has been filed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard per consensus at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Baboon43. I am letting you know since you participated in the RFC/U. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

You almost have to respect his gutsiness, am I right? MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Oh dear lord... Dusti*Let's talk!* 20:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Kim Seung-soo

I noticed that the previous editor in List of South Korean dramas added all of Kim Seung-soo's TV series that were not previously listed, even though they didn't have their own Wikipedia pages. So I double-checked his filmography in AsianWiki.com and Wiki.D-addicts.com, and Kim Seung-soo doesn't seem to be part of the Who Are You (2013) cast, nor are there any articles supporting this. Which is why I deleted it. [4]

203.215.116.47 (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Why?

Why do you accuse me of vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Two kinds of pork (talk • contribs) 21:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

GA Review

Hi Dusti,

I tried to fix the issues you set out at the POA. Thanks, Matty.007 21:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Matty! Thanks :) I'll get to it later this evening :) Dusti*Let's talk!* 22:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi again Dusti, I was just wondering if the article was OK now, as I have fixed the points, but I haven't heard anything from you. Thanks, Matty.007 20:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 Done Congratulations on your new GA! :) Dusti*Let's talk!* 01:36, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dusti/Archive_3&oldid=1168300837"