User talk:Dr. Kadzi/Archives/2022/July

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi - I resubmitted the article with original content. Please advise if there is still an issue with this - and, of course, notability. Hydhomboy64 (talk) 19:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Review

I really do not understand why you have decided to attack my life's work because I attempted to submit an article at the new company I am working for. The pages you have suggested for deletion are over 10 years old. If you have a vendetta against the crypto industry that is fine but please keep that perception to yourself and do not take away the history of others. I honestly do not get why you have decided you must try to remove references to my achievements that have been accepted by others for over a decade. 0xCryptoDegen (talk) 13:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

I have no vendetta against any industry, and if the articles were notable I would not have nominated them? Your life achievements still stand regardless of whether or not they have an article.

I won’t be making the decision - it’s fairly decided by others.   Kadzi   (talk) 13:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

I now have to try to find and source material for a decade old project in order to retain references to my work. Many of the sites are dead and therefore what was once notable is now no longer according to your current criteria for notability. I get the Banter Media deletion to be fair but removing myself and Ex Cathedra doesn't. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of the digital age and I could rest assured that while the websites that linked to my work back in 2010 may have gone it would live on through Wikipedia which had accepted it and preserved the history. When these are deleted that will no longer be the case. I get removing articles that have been made recently but removing decade old content seem malicious. You will say its not but that's the impact it has. 0xCryptoDegen (talk) 13:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Just to update - Someone on my team at Banter most likely made the original edits. We had a great team and probably one of our interns who wasn't involved in the film put it together after one of the private showings. It was 13 years ago. I wanted to leave a comment as I've asked for the talk page to be deleted. Not because "you found me out" but because another user exposed my IP address and I do not wish that to be as public as it was made. I'm done arguing on this matter and will leave it to you experts to delete all the content you see fit. I feel the way you looked into the accounts a little unsettling to say the least so I'm happy not being involved at all. 0xCryptoDegen (talk) 18:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)