User talk:Doctorsamchiu5

Previous[edit]

You previously edited as Doxim (talk · contribs). So there is clearly a COI. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:59, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was a different username and was deleted right away. If the new article complies with the notability guidelines of a company profile as listed on wikipedia, then that should be enough to allow me to write a new article on the same subject.

Doctorsamchiu5 (talk) 14:28, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Doxim Logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Doxim Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Doxim logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Doxim logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Hello Doctorsamchiu5. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Doxim Inc., you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Zachlipton (talk) 19:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Doxim logo.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Doxim logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zachlipton (talk) 19:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Doxim Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doxim Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doxim[edit]

The article Doxim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article. No evidence or claim of notability, no RSes. WP:BEFORE shows press releases and some churnalism based on them. There's not enough to pass WP:CORP. Article has been like this since its creation in 2011; no reasonable prospect of organic improvement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 21:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Doxim for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doxim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doxim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

David Gerard (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]