User talk:Dnb01

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Dnb01, good luck, and have fun. -- Lear's Fool 01:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice try with Farrell[edit]

That information about the role he played in Rudd's removal definitely deserves to be added to the article. He along with those other factional chiefs orchestrated the numbers and his name is mentioned in numerous sources on the web apart from opinion pieces. Those other chiefs have this info. to their article, why not Farrell? Sure, as Timeshift9 said, SA is not Australia, but he basically controls what goes on with Labor in that state and who comes in and out and oversees his work in the form of Kate Ellis, Amanda Rishworth, Nick Champion and others from the SDA. He has enormous power and if he didn't, his name would not be mentioned on the web in connection with Rudd. By the way, don't be intimidated with Timeshift, he thinks he controls all the political articles on the encyclopedia and a quick look at his userpage shows his obvious bias which he cannot help. He is the shadow that lurks after every change to every political article. Remember, he doesn't own anything, no one does. Take his words with a grain of salt. Cheers Sweet little angel 102 (talk) 01:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dnb01, welcome to Wikipedia! I must say after catching up on User:Timeshift9s latest edit history you seem to have done a good job in 'ratling the cage' so to speak. As with User:Sweet little angel 102 above, he does have some little influence over what goes on with Australian political articles, however his bias is what leads him undone in every situation. Don't be disenchanted at all by his pettiness and continue to edit in a constructive manner as you can be rewarded in all different ways and measures. Happy editing :) Романов (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]