User talk:Djames11170

Thanks for contributing to the article Cornelius Keagon ‎. However, do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 02:19, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cornelius Keagon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cornelius Keagon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelius Keagon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 19:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why should this article be deleted? Djames11170 (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted Djames11170 (talk) 19:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DenG[edit]

Hi Djames11170, I reverted the edits you made to the DenG article because they are not constructive. Per WP:BLPCRIME, we are not allowed to add criminal accusations to BLP articles until a conviction is secured. Sweetz only accused DenG and did not file a legal case against him in court. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 19:40, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I'm sorry about that. I'll remove my statements along with the citation. Please the article about Cornelius Keagon should not be deleted. His work deserved to be known. Djames11170 (talk) 19:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Cornelius Keagon. If you closed this AFD again, I will report you and you will get blocked. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 23:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm begging you brother Djames11170 (talk) 23:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me a chance with this article. He's our country man Djames11170 (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm, ok if u say so Djames11170 (talk) 23:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]