User talk:DemonDays64/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
May 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"MOS:Dumb quotes" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect MOS:Dumb quotes. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 1#MOS:Dumb quotes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 01:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christopher Larkin (Australian composer), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Minor requests at User talk:DemonDays64/Scripts/Dumb quotes
Hi, just under a month ago I made a couple suggestions for improving the dumb quotes script on the documentation talk page. Could you please take a look at them if you haven't already? Thanks. Ionmars10 (talk) 22:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Ionmars10: oh! Didn't see those. Thank you for them. DemonDays64 (talk) 23:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Christopher Larkin (Australian composer)
Hello, DemonDays64. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Christopher Larkin".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 19:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you
for making that important clarification on Josh Gottheimer! I previously noticed it as a potential issue, and I'm glad that you fixed it. In fact, he voted for the House resolution to oppose the Syria withdrawal ([1]). Be well and stay safe. RedHotPear (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- @RedHotPear: you’re welcome! I’m always happy to improve the encyclopedia, thanks for your kind words! DemonDays64 (talk) 21:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Solar One
Hello, I realized you edited a page I made last year. The other day I made another page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Solar_One_(spacecraft) , but reviewers are declining its approval. Would you be able to please help me? I think the page I submitted meets all the wikipedia rules: several, notable, secondary, indenpendent, relevant sources that cover the topic in detail. The reviewers are saying that the my page isn't 'interesting', 'notable' and 'peer-reviewed', but I think none of those are reasons to decline a submission. The article of the page has been covered in detail by several notable and relevant media and magazines. Your help would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertheditor (talk • contribs) 03:05, June 26, 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for your work on state legislative election articles!
Just wanted to drop in and say thanks for working on them - I notice that they tend to get neglected compared to US House/US Senate/Gubernatorial elections, which is frustrating as they often have more influence on people's day-to-day lives. So, I really appreciate your work on them. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 20:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Elliot321: Thanks! There's a lot of work to be done on them and it's not so hard but makes the info (with very transparent sourcing unlike on Ballotpedia) so much easier to find.
DemonDays64 (talk) 22:11, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I wish Ballotpedia cited their sources better. Sadly, they are often one of the only decent sources of data, especially for elections of past years. Is there a particular tool you use to create the maps? For 2016 Nevada State Senate election, I used census data with qgis and inkscape to deal with the final SVG file, but I'm wondering if there is an easier way. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 23:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Elliot321: for File:2016 Connecticut State Senate Election.svg, I simply edited the 2018 map by User:CosmicKanan in the Atom text editor — that map was already set up so it was pretty easy to change the classes on each district's SVG to match the election's data. (So far I haven't made any other maps). As a tip, to make it a lot easier to make other maps with the same shapes, I recommend you store the CSS styling for each kind of district (i.e. D flip, R flip, D hold, R hold) in a style tag. Thus you just have to put the class on the appropriate objects when mapping different data. DemonDays64 (talk) 01:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, cool. I've generally been using Inkscape instead of editing the text directly or I think I would do that. Maybe there's a way to do it in Inkscape? I'm still somewhat new to this, too. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 03:34, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Elliot321: not sure what Inkscape lets you do with classes. But I found that, with my minor amount of HTML/CSS expertise, an organized SVG wasn't so tough to edit — even though I've never used XML and don't really know what it is tbh. DemonDays64 (talk) 06:52, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, cool. I've generally been using Inkscape instead of editing the text directly or I think I would do that. Maybe there's a way to do it in Inkscape? I'm still somewhat new to this, too. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 03:34, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Elliot321: for File:2016 Connecticut State Senate Election.svg, I simply edited the 2018 map by User:CosmicKanan in the Atom text editor — that map was already set up so it was pretty easy to change the classes on each district's SVG to match the election's data. (So far I haven't made any other maps). As a tip, to make it a lot easier to make other maps with the same shapes, I recommend you store the CSS styling for each kind of district (i.e. D flip, R flip, D hold, R hold) in a style tag. Thus you just have to put the class on the appropriate objects when mapping different data. DemonDays64 (talk) 01:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I wish Ballotpedia cited their sources better. Sadly, they are often one of the only decent sources of data, especially for elections of past years. Is there a particular tool you use to create the maps? For 2016 Nevada State Senate election, I used census data with qgis and inkscape to deal with the final SVG file, but I'm wondering if there is an easier way. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 23:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to AutoHotkey does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
URL template
Please read the documentation at {{URL}} It passes the client through and the target can rewrite to secure if the browser can handle it while if it cannot, it will not. However if you force secure and the browser cannot handle the secure layer (for whatever reason) they will not be able to see the destination. The protocol is therefore not required. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Amy Kennedy
Regarding this edit - is there a reason you listed Amy Kennedy as a former wife of Ted's nephew Patrick? This threw me for a loop because Patrick is Ted's son, and Amy and Patrick are (as far as I can tell) still married. 174.204.72.11 (talk) 07:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- oh!!! I skimmed the article badly sorry. She’s currently married to him lol. Thanks DemonDays64 (talk) 14:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I should not be editing Wikipedia so late DemonDays64 (talk) 14:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fundéu
Hello. I've noticed you have tagged Fundéu_BBVA with an ‘Advert’. I'd like to modify it to follow the Wikipedia policies, but I'm not sure which parts must be revised (or even removed). --Neodimio (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Neodimio: idk, I'll take a look sometime today or tomorrow and do it myself. was kind of lazy of me, not really that many things need fixing. Thanks for asking, DemonDays64 (talk) 18:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Oregon House of Representatives elections requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Liz: oh, I simply forgot to put the page in there! Fixed now. DemonDays64 (talk) 17:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tag on Interlingue for clarification
Hi there,
I'm the main maintainer of the page on Interlingue and gave the first section a bit of a rewrite after seeing your tag. The sentence you flagged is an old one that has been there since before I began expanding the page and now the second paragraph deals with the subject better so I deleted it and made a bit of a rewrite, but feel free to put the tag back if it's not satisfactory. Or are you looking for sources that the language is part of the naturalistic school of auxlangs? If so then let me know, as I can easily come up with a few references from Cosmoglotta and elsewhere.
Mithridates (talk) 12:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of politicians of Washington (state)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of politicians of Washington (state) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al Gross (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DSCC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Suggestion re NH results
I agree that 26 votes is hardly worth the mention in the chart. It might be reasonable to write a sentence or two under the chart itself indicating that, per tradition, those three small towns completed their voting in the first hour of election day, with the results of X, Y, Z. You could reference Decision Desk HQ (which Twitter considers a reliable source) and CNN for Dixville Notch, I've yet to find a second source for the other two towns (Dixville and Millsfield). Gonna be honest, I'd like to see a minimum of 2 RS's for all "projections" and results. Risker checklist (talk) 05:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Risker checklist: yeah I also had two sources for a second before deciding not. Sort of related — what's the consensus on how to treat tweets from verified accounts of journalists at reliable sources? Can they be used as a reference? DemonDays64 (talk) 06:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Removing categories
Please be more careful: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andy_Kaufman&type=revision&diff=987324725&oldid=987118914. Do you need help with any of the categorization tools? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:Jewish American female comedians
I saw that you added an article on my watchlist to Category:Jewish American female comedians. Have you read WP:GHETTO? This would seem to be an example of that issue. Mo Billings (talk) 16:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Mo Billings: oh...sorry. that category probably shouldn't exist. I need to read policies more :-/ DemonDays64 (talk) 07:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- No problem, I understand. It should be easy to do a search and find all comedians who are female and Jewish and American, but Wikipedia's category system doesn't work for that so people create categories like this. Mo Billings (talk) 16:32, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- DemonDays64, Everyone makes misteaks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Please do a quick Google before adding a Citation Needed tag. Thanks.
A quick comment on this edit you made on October 27th. The sentence clearly says that it is referring to the New York Times. If you type "Fetterman NYTIMES" or "Fetterman New York Times" into Google, literally the very first result is clearly the article being referenced by this sentence. Please reserve {{cn}} tags for a last resort when you can't find a source. Otherwise you're just creating situations that other editors have to clean up. Thanks. --Krelnik (talk) 14:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Request
Can you convert bare URLs in 2020_United_States_presidential_election#Election_recounts. 183.171.115.121 (talk) 08:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Done Special:Diff/988796913 DemonDays64 (talk) 08:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gretchen Whitmer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Between the Lines.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Category:Politicians from Hopkinton, Rhode Island has been nominated for merging
Category:Politicians from Hopkinton, Rhode Island has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
PD files below TOO
Hi DemonDays64. I noticed you nominating a number of PD-simple files below TOO at FfD which were erroneously labeled as non-free. In case you weren't aware, a discussion is not required to correct these. If you come across such files in the future, feel free to make the necessary corrections. Regards, FASTILY 01:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Fastily: oh, didn't know that! to clarify -- if it's a clear case you mean I should just relabel them, export them to Commons, and mark them for speedy deletion? thanks, 03:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Also @Fastily: what should i do in cases like File:1stdibs marketplace.jpg where it is a clear pd logo but a suppressed version (in this case one which is the same but higher-quality) is stopping an export? just mark for speedy deletion and explain by the template? DemonDays64 (talk) 03:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- I should just relabel them, export them to Commons, and mark them for speedy deletion?
- Yes, please do.
- what should i do in cases like File:1stdibs marketplace.jpg
- I should just relabel them, export them to Commons, and mark them for speedy deletion?
A New Year With Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Upcoming elections
A tag has been placed on Category:Upcoming elections requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Antonio James Manchin.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Antonio James Manchin.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Tyranny of Big Tech, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Do you know what's going on here?
I keep seeing a pop-up saying, "An attempt to load a user script has failed. Please see JavaScript console for more information." —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 01:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
@HueMan1: that seems to be because of the StubSorter.js script, which is linked on the warning popup I see on mobile. Removing it from your js file will probably fix it (I haven't tried yet). Btw your username being uncapitalized in your signature led to my first attempt at pinging failing; you may want to change it to say HueMan1 or hueMan1. DemonDays64 (talk) 03:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- @DemonDays64: I removed all scripts on my common.js and the pop-up finally disappeared but I have yet to identify which one is causing it. About the name, I'll probably change it to something else later on. Thank you for your response! —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 09:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Upcoming elections
A tag has been placed on Category:Upcoming elections requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Bling-bling
Hi there! I reverted your addition of {{Multiple issues}} to the Bling-bling article because you did not specify the issues. Please see the documentation at Template:Multiple issues to see how to specify which issues this article has. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 17:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Error introduced by script
Hi DemonDays64, I'm letting you know that this edit introduced a reference error ("Cite error: The named reference Manila Note II was invoked but never defined (see the help page)."). —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 07:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: Hmm! Thanks for letting me know. While my script was used in that edit, if you look at the code there is nothing that would have touched the reference that got broken -- it only edits four kinds of characters, none of which were in the Manila Note II reference. I don't know how notes work to be honest but the problem I assume is that
group="note"was removed from the reference, as that was the only change to it. ProveIt was used and edits references, so it's probably a problem with that one?
- Thanks for checking in! DemonDays64 (talk) 07:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough, thanks for looking into it. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 07:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Triple soft redirect
Template:Triple soft redirect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. JsfasdF252 (talk) 22:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi
You left a message on my talk page saying one of my edits was reverted because 'it did not appear to be constructive'. While I understand it was removed because of the lack of a primary source, I think it is unfair to assume that I had bad intentions with it. I have seen many people on 'potential candidates' lists that link to someone proposing them to run, even if the person themself has not said anything about it. I understand if that is a greater issue that needs to be fixed on a wider scale, but I was not trying to be disruptive. I don't think you had bad intentions in assuming I had bad intentions either, but I'm just saying I meant well. Bird25 (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Bird25
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia triple soft redirects
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia triple soft redirects requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:58, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging