User talk:DemoJoker47

September 2023[edit]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User talk:MikeAllen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 14:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Your recent editing history at Fallout (American TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- ferret (talk) 21:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DemoJoker47 reported by User:Ferret (Result: ). Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 22:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Fallout (American TV series). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that returning to continue an edit war can result in a longer, or even indefinite, block. -- ferret (talk) 19:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an edit war. It has a 93% look at any other show that has that. Stop abusing your power. DemoJoker47 (talk) 00:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ISN’T DemoJoker47 (talk) 00:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did not mean to say Is it meant to write isn’t. DemoJoker47 (talk) 00:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's absolutely an edit war. That's why you were already blocked for it. -- ferret (talk) 00:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are just abusing your power DemoJoker47 (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't even used any "powers" here. -- ferret (talk) 01:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know who blocked me but I named shoes with a lower rating then fallout who have been critical acclaim and I get blocked and you get mad at me DemoJoker47 (talk) 01:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of ~~2 weeks~~ 72 hours for edit warring over the same material that led to your previous block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

DemoJoker47, edit warring is really harmful to the proper functioning of Wikipedia. As the policy says, it's unconstructive, creates animosity between editors, makes consensus harder to reach, and causes confusion for readers. At this point, you've seen that two other editors disagree and you've been blocked twice for edit warring. Rather than continually making the same edit, you need to discuss the matter with others on the talk page and see if you can build consensus for your change. Specific to this dispute, I would also strongly recommend reading MOS:ACCLAIMED. Superlatives like "critical acclaim" and "box office bomb" need to be attributed to multiple sources. Basically, the other editors seem to be following the Manual of Style and I'm pretty sure they're undoing your change for that reason. Without reliable sources making specific and clear claims that the show has been critically acclaimed, the reality is that you're going to be reverted by almost everyone experienced in editing television show articles. And please don't continue to edit war. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]