User talk:Dark star in ocean

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Dark star in ocean, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Andy Laode Abdul Hasan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! jfd34 (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andy Laode Abdul Hasan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Laode Abdul Hasan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Laode Abdul Hasan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jfd34 (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Andy Laode Abdul Hasan. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Andy Laode Abdul Hasan. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: No, adding a single citation does not resolve the AfD or stop it. Removing the notice does not stop the discussion either. You will need to provide several citations to establish his notability and present your case on the AfD page on why he meets the notability guidelines. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Andy Laode Abdul Hasan, you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Andy Laode Abdul Hasan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for undeletion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Andy_Laode_Abdul_Hasan. JohnCD (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is selective about subjects for articles. The test used is called Wikipedia:Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See WP:42 and WP:Notability (people) for more detail. JohnCD (talk) 11:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]