User talk:DPMGregg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Gusfriend (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, DPMGregg! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, DPMGregg. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 174.21.19.94 (talk) 01:12, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is mandatory that you either declare your paid of COI connection to Steve Gregg on your User page or else declare here on your Talk page that you are neither paid nor have any personal connection to Gregg's ministry. Failure to do so will result in you being indefinitely blocked as an undeclared paid editor. David notMD (talk) 10:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The extensive cuts I made were attempts to bring this closer to Wikipedia acceptability, but in my opinion is if resubmitted it will be declined again. The fatal flaw is that so much of the content is referenced to Gregg's own website and social media. David notMD (talk) 10:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your advice. I do see the problems that you are pointing out, very clearly. I did declare my connection on some Wiki form, somewhere, when I first started the process. I am not paid, but am definitely connected. The real problem is finding that totally disconnected person or organization to do this. I have contacted the seminary where he has taught, and asked if they have a biography of him anywhere, but they would've gotten that info from him, anyway. The publisher, Thomas Nelson/ Harper Collins, apparently would not count, as they are his publisher. The radio stations would get their information from him also, and have nothing published that I know of ... so I don't know where to look. The magazines for which he has written, again, same issue. Random websites have info, but they are often very inaccurate at times (sometimes conflating him with a pastor in Florida, which he is not), hence the desire to create a Wiki page (more legit). When there is no salary or contracts, there is no documentation, so it becomes as proving a universal negative. Anyway, I sure appreciate you trying to help. I am asking around, but I guess I am stuck. DPMGregg (talk) 17:15, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi DPMGregg! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Copyright problem, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, DPMGregg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Steve Gregg - American Radio Broadcaster & Bible Teacher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DPMGregg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Steve Gregg - American Radio Broadcaster & Bible Teacher".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Josh, I don't want to give up trying to get a wiki page for this particular teacher/ author/ radio broadcaster, but I am struggling to find acceptable sources (apart from the person, family, their publisher, etc) all of whom are too close (apparently) to the subject. BUT, someone recently sent me a link to an AI compilation about the subject that is quite accurate (except AI added a book title that was NOT the author's, but everything else in the article was correct and rather well written, however very brief. 1. Is Wiki considering accepting AI articles as acceptable, as it is certainly likely neutral. 2. What sources does one try to find since published articles, books, and webpages by the subject are not accepable? DPMGregg (talk) 18:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Steve Gregg[edit]

Information icon Hello, DPMGregg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Steve Gregg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Steve Gregg[edit]

Hello, DPMGregg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Steve Gregg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:10, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]