User talk:DDatGuy1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello. Your edits HERE and HERE do not pass WP:V and WP:RS policy. Please enter information that is consistent with these policies. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 05:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC), and I approve this message.[reply]

Your edits to Puerto Rican people[edit]

Hello. Your edits HERE and HERE do not pass WP:V policy. Please enter information that is can be verified into the encyclopedia. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 05:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC), and I approve this message.[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Mercy11. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Imzadi 1979  23:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

SlimVirgin talk|contribs 23:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DDatGuy1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand I did negatively use and abuse the use of editing and multiple accounts, specifically with AllStarSun1, TattelTales1, and DatPersonUDontKno, as well as from the IP Address 68.194.239.60, and I honestly wont do it again, and I will greatly contribute to various articles.

Decline reason:

This only addresses part of the reason for your block, and only barely at that. Also, how exactly do you intend to "greatly contribute"? Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DDatGuy1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand I did negatively use and abuse the use of editing privileges and multiple accounts, specifically with AllStarSun1, TattelTales1, and DatPersonUDontKno, as well as from the IP Address 68.194.239.60, and I honestly wont do it again, and I will greatly contribute to various articles, by providing more valuable information about a specific subject and expanding the article.

Decline reason:

Your antics post-block give me no reason to believe any of this is genuine. Toddst1 (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Does that include:

You won't be unblocked until you show clear understanding of these.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]