This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Seriously? Again? I thought you'd stopped. Ravensfire (talk) 15:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
User pages and user_talk pages
Hi. Please don't move your user page and user talk page to another user name, even one that doesn't exist yet. If you want to rename your account, go to the WP:Changing username page. Otherwise, please remove the redirect from your user page to another page. You can redirect your user page to your talk page if you wish. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello D'SuperHero,
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! I must take issue though with your nomination for speedy deletion of the page I created, Deadly Buda. The article is clearly not about a musical recording! Thus, you cannot use that criteria as a reason for speedy deletion. It is about a person's role in starting a music subculture, backed by good reference material. It is also about that person's role as a noted visual artist, also well referenced. Also, I am just starting the article and plan to add much more to it. DonFrenzi (talk) 10:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I've replaced your speedy deletion tag on Deadly Buda (A9 -> A7) as the tag you used is only for musical recordings and the subject of the article is not a musical recording. 823510731 (talk) 13:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
You've re-added the tag again, with the edit summary "until no contestion please stop removing template". I did not create the article, and I am contesting the deletion. Please see WP:CSD, which says " The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag from it. Only an editor who is not the creator of a page may do so. " Your continual reversions are probably in breach of WP:3RR: please stop. Norvoid (talk) 10:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
You have speedy tagged this article, but this was contested, repeatedly, by different, very respected Wikipedians. There in no point for you to keep re-adding your tag. Your opinion has been heard and addressed already.
Just a friendly reminder. Greetings. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MarkYabloko 11:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Jin, PLEASE stop being disruptive and listen to the feedback your getting above and stop ignoring it. It's just causing more and more problems, taking up more and more of other people's time. Ravensfire (talk) 14:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.
Stop adding deletion tags where they do not belong, or find yourself blocked. —Swpbtalk 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Mistaken warning message
This edit, in which you warned an editor about making an unsuitable report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, was evidently a mistake, as the editor has never made a report there. I suggest that you remove your message, and perhaps you would also like to post a message explaining that it was a mistake. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop biting new editors
Please read Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. Your actions toward new editor UndergroundDarkSkull are a good example of how not to deal with mistakes by new editors. UndergroundDarkSkull created Gabriel Delmas. You speedied it A3, then when they tried to remove the tag and create the article, you slapped a level 4 warning on their talk page. There was no welcome message, and little clue given of what they should do next. Next time, use a level 1 warning, and if there's a problem, then talk to the editor before beating them over the head with a level 4 tag. They will certainly not be blocked from editing after one removal of a deletion tag while trying to create their first article, and jumping straight to level 4 warnings as some sort of time saver to get them listed on AIV is a violation of both the letter and spirit of Wikipedia policy. You need to learn to WP:Assume good faith, and quit going all Robocop on new editors. Thank you. Norvoid (talk) 12:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Aamir Khan: On Intolerance
Hi,
I had recently made some edits to the Aamir Khan page. I had added a quote from him which clarified why he made the comments on intolerance. Now, that quote is gone and the most immediate deletion, citing vandalism, was done by you. Can you confirm if you removed that quote? If so, why and what was the disagreement? Please let me know so that we can make that article better. Note that there was no vandalism on my part, I think that quote makes the intolerance argument more balanced.
Thanks,
Vvnmithun (talk) 20:14, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Vvnmithun, I had added that quote into the quotebox being not in vandlism category and i didn't removed it. In addition, the quotebox is given already so need to worry enough. Thanks. D'SuperHero (talk) 05:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Arundalmia, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TJRC (talk) 23:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Looks like this notification went to you because User:Arundalmia created it by moving his talk page there, and since you were the first person to post on his talk page, Wikipedia shows you as technically the creating editor. Sorry about the false alarm. TJRC (talk) 23:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ajay Devgan filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crime Patrol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright
Please be careful not to add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imran Aslam (actor), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Tribune, Sana Javed and Sadia Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Umang Jain— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 07:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Masjid
The issue has been addressed. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 10:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello D'SuperHero. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3), or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Dreamyproject. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. The article seems a bit promotional to me, however it doesn't fit to A1 since it was created just 1 minute ago. You should wait around 15 minutes and then you can tag it.Dat GuyWiki (talk) 06:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I noticed a similar issue at Wound healing assay. In that case, there was over an hour between the article creation and the A1 tag, but WP:A1 says, "If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate." The subject was clear to me, and with only minimal effort, I was able to confirm the notability of this subject, fix some formatting problems and expand it a little. EricEnfermero (Talk) 09:20, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to pile on this a bit but your tag on মিসিসিপি মহাসড়ক ৪৭৩ for speedy deletion under WP:G1 is also invalid. G1 specifically does not include coherent non-English material, or poorly translated material. As has already been said, thank you for page patrolling, it is important but it is also important that it is done correctly. I don't want to dampen your enthusiasm but please take time to read the patrol instructions and especially the criteria for speedy deletion. Incidentally in the is case I have deleted মিসিসিপি মহাসড়ক ৪৭৩ but under WP:A10 and will be leaving a message for the page creator. Nthep (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
2018 Election pages
Hello.
I don't mean to be aggressive nor stepping your toes. I just want an explanation why
Winterysteppe First of all, the pages you've made doesn't have any claims of significance rather creation of 1 liner article. Moreover get to know that Wikipedia doesn't act like a crystal ball as future events, which have been specified so earlier prior its date do not have any Wikipedia page. Marvel has a total line-up of films until 2019 but still it do not have their own Wiki page. Read the guidelines and edit the pages with accuracy. D'SuperHero (talk) 05:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
So more or less, the pages should have more than 1 one of text to it,,, and more or less should be created when the draws nearer? Winterysteppe (talk) 14:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Winterysteppe my friend an article must have good citiations, well written without copyvio. Plus as for future articles, i told you to read this WP:Crystal. And follow up with these guidelines. Single text articles are highly discouraged. D'SuperHero (talk) 14:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation! Winterysteppe (talk) 14:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Hey can someone please make the playstation originals page. Its making a ratchet and clank movie and it has a show called powers in 2015. Crazybob2014 (talk) 17:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
One question. Is it too early to create the page for Star Wars 8?
Is it too early to create the page? i know its slated to be released in 2017 May 26th but i was wondering if there is a "general timeframe" for creating of early pages. Winterysteppe (talk) 21:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
@Dat GuyWiki: By that reasoning, its fine to create the page since some filming has occurred, as evidenced by this Telegraph.co.uk article. But thank you. Winterysteppe (talk) 21:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
I added some ref & one source to the article, do you thimk it was improved enough to be un-tagged?--D.mod.61 (talk) 13:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
@D.mod.61: Although I am not the user, I will take the tag off since the sources are WP:Reliable and enough for a stub article. Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion tagging
Please go back and review the speedy deletion criterion before doing anymore speedy deletion tagging. I just declined three speedy deletions that you tagged as not having enough context to understand what the article is about. All three of them had plenty of information to understand what they were about. -- GBfan 14:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
I just declined another A1 speedy deletion nomination you did. You obviously do not understand the criterion. Do not tag any more articles with A1 until you have reread the criterion and understand it. -- GBfan 12:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
I also just saw that Mike Rosoft declined another one for the same concern. -- GBfan 12:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for following up. Note that I have removed the DYK talk template from the Beer jam talk page (diff), because the article did not appear as a DYK on 28 December. DYKUpdateBot typically performs the addition of the template when DYK entries appear on Main page, so you don't need to add the template in advance. North America1000 06:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
I notice that you have now removed the entry from prep area 1 and have reverted your comment above that was previously here on this page ("The article has been added in prep area 1", diff). Since you're a new user, I strongly recommend that you abstain from promoting DYK nominations, because when you promote them but don't properly list the hooks, you are throwing away people's hard work. North America1000 06:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
I've reverted this edit you made to the {{GANotice2}} template. That template is a generic template used by multiple editors. Your change broke that, make it usable only by yourself when you made it only refer to your user name in some scenarios. Please don't break generic templates like that. Ravensfire (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Hiya. I saw that you tagged User:Ved_save as nonsense under the nonsense criterion. This criterion applies to pages that are illegible or otherwise truly unreadable. Please also note that different rules apply to user space than articles, so many of the criteria for speedy deletion do not apply in user space. --jonny-mt 12:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
One individual expressed slight concerns that non-neutrally worded notices went out to talk pages so it needs time for me figure out if the support votes came in whether their opinions may be influenced by these notices. Should be done by this week. OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks OhanaUnited. Because the discussions which have been opened more than weeks or months ago, may be archived and closed. And 2 of the portals have been received "Support" votes. Once again thanks. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 06:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Ajay Devgan filmography at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yash! 10:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi D'SuperHero. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Katietalk 17:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
This is a complaint against User:ARNAB22 ...Sir i just found out from the talk page of this user that even u have asked him to behave. But he simply refuses to do so. For instance, on the Bollywood wikipedia page, he has been posting a new pic of Shah Rukh Khan even though there is already a pic of Shah Rukh given there. And in the caption he writes that Shah Rukh has won "most number of awards", without giving any citation. Every time someone removes this pic and citation, he again posts it there, despite being warned against this. He recently did this on 20 Jan, 2016.
In addition, he uses poor English in many of his other edits, and has been warned on this too by other users (see his talk page). I request you to take action against User:ARNAB22. Thanks.117.197.23.118 (talk) 11:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello D'SuperHero, I just notice you reverted one of my edit from Airlift. I just want to know are there any evidence of film shooting in Gujrat? as I can not see any. Thank You – GSS (talk) 06:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Rollback
It seems like you reverted this edit using Rollback. Please note Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits. Please take a moment to read Rollback guidlines for avoiding this mistake in future. Thank You – GSS (talk) 06:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Ajay Devgan
Another user has replied to your post there. North America1000 06:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unexplained removal of sourced info.
Hello, I'm Myopia123. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Airlift (film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Myopia123 (talk) 11:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Improper use of Rollback
Please do NOT use Rollback for anything other than obvious vandalism. This edit is clearly NOT vandalism yet you used rollback to revert it. You were warned about this a couple of days ago, please don't do it again. Take some time to review WP:VAND for what is and is not vandalism. Continuing to use rollback incorrectly will lead to it being removed. Please acknowledge that you have read and understood this. Ravensfire (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to be suspicious of you, but I recently found a link between an IP's edits voting favourably for some of your nominations. I brought up the topic at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Something fishy. JollyΩJanner 20:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
I have reverted your recent changes to this template because it was causing errors on some articles. Please test all changes to templates thoroughly before deploying! Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
MSGJ , Needed actually lil help for this. The map is showing error despite being fixed. I had implemented in Panvel railway station but it has getting problems. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 07:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
It has been over a week without any response. We need to hear from you soon if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charas (2004 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hariharan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Airlift (film)
Hello! Your submission of Airlift (film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
D'SuperHero, a notice was posted to this talk page on February 3 about issues with the hook you've proposed for this nomination. You archived the notice on February 16, yet nothing has been done to address the issues that were raised.
You need to do something right away to respond to the review. If you don't, the nomination will probably have to be closed soon. Please take action very soon. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
License tagging for File:TheFilm2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TheFilm2005.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, could you review this list which I intent to nominate for FL. I had submitted it for peer review and received some comments from a user. He suggested me to call for more reviews from other users. --Inside the Valley (talk) 18:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Inside the Valley Well will see. Infact , i also had pending nominated article for peer review in order to nominate as a GA. Will review ur article soon. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 09:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
I thought you declined my request. Including you I requested six editors for reviewing it, without any response I closed the PR yesterday and nominated it for FL. What is the procedure for withdrawing it. After which I can start a second PR for your comments. --Inside the Valley (talk) 09:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry, my FL nomination has already addressed by two editors. You can join them if you wish. --Inside the Valley (talk) 12:55, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
The article Aamir Khan you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aamir Khan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 07:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aamir Khan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 18:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I don't think I understand this edit. The reference you provided, this, doesn't say "psychological thriller". It doesn't even say "psychological" or "thriller". I've restored "thriller" and provided a reliable reference. Note also, that I don't care what genre the film is in, I only care what can be reliably sourced and agreed upon, and frankly since the film hasn't been released yet, it's definitely too early to get nitpicky about subgenres. Genre is subjective and we have to be sure to present the broadest representative genre. After all, one man's thriller is another man's suspense... Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb And what about first female billing?? Waluscha & other female characters credited before SRK using a 2013 source. I had even mentioned this on the film's talk page. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 05:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
You've changed the subject. I'm asking about why you've asserted genres that are not supported by the reference you've provided. Do you not see a problem with that? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
I know i had agreed to the claim. But im asking you for billing discussion. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 06:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The instructions for the |starring= parameter in the infobox is Template:Infobox film. Starring roles are determined by the billing block on the film's poster. If that's not available, as it typically is not in Indian cinema, the film's onscreen credits can be used. If that's not helpful (i.e. if no distinction is made between "Starring" and the rest of the cast) official production websites are sometimes used. WP:FILMCAST covers the rest. Shahrukh Khan isn't in charge of Wikipedia, so his preference that women's names should be listed before his isn't something we need to adhere to, however, (and this is very important) if a film's theatrical release poster puts the female lead actor's name first, or if the credits give the female lead a starring credit first, then absolutely we should observe that without question, because we always go with the official ordering. Wikipedians have to be vigilant to avoid conscious and unconscious gender bias, which means we need to constantly be evaluating the content we submit. Wikipedia is frequently criticized as male-centric and anti-feminist, and we have to be sure we are taking all opportunities to promote equality while still being faithful to the sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
What was your rationale for removing the Plot section at Fan (film)?
Regarding this edit, what was your specific objection to the inclusion of plot in the article? "no need please!" doesn't quite cut it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Cyphoidbomb first let the film release. There was no point of adding summaries or even plot. Only silver lining is the film's small chunk of story that "a FAN turns a nightmare for his STAR". So anything else on it? SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Plot is integral to film articles. If a general plot line can be identified and supported by reliable sources, a simple sentence about it is surely warranted at this stage. There's no requirement at MOS:FILM that a single sentence about the plot be suppressed until the film is released. It doesn't need its own section just yet, but absolutely something like "The film centers on a young man, Gaurav, who becomes obsessed with, Aryan, a popular Indian movie star" in the lead is completely suitable if that is what the film is about. We should be editing based on established community norms, not arbitrary preferences. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Censorship on MTV, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Arise (song) and Cradle of Love. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Rock a Bye Baby Nursery.png
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SabreBD (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Read more closely, please
Surely you don't honestly think this content is suitable for inclusion, do you? This source you provided does not declare definitively that Fan is based on the other The Fan. Might it be? Yes. Is it very possible? Well, considering the rampant plagiarism in Indian cinema, absolutely! But can Wikipedia make that declaration based on that speculative, comparative write-up? No. Please read things more carefully. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb That "indeed" was my last edit on that page. If you are re-assessing it for "GA" of "FA" then it's fine. Already, the page has a protection and talking about plagiarism, many sources says this from relevant sites as a "copy" (slang for unauthorized remake), including Deccan Chronicle, DNA India, India TV and from a British-based The Huffington Post. Aaand kindly have a look on these sources (probably you wont believe the sites as independent sources, i bet) [1], [2], [3] and [4]. Neways thanks. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 05:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
I have no idea what you mean by "If you are re-assessing it for 'GA' or 'FA' then it's fine." What's fine? Making a controversial statement that isn't adequately substantiated? You still seem to miss the point. People noting similarities between a trailer and a film is not the same thing as saying definitively "this is an adaptation" or "this is a remake" or "this is a copy". The various sources you've provided ask, "Is this a copy?" They don't say that it definitively is. And even if they were all convinced (after the film was released) that it was a copy, it still is an opinion, not an incontrovertible fact that a conscientious editor would slap into the |based_on= parameter of the infobox. How are we keeping a neutral point of view when a Wikipedia editor has taken a side and decides that an opinion is a fact? This source that you provided says, "We are still unsure if this particular movie inspired Maneesh and SRK to make Fan". Does that justify your addition? Obviously not. I don't know how to make it any clearer. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Not to mention, an article on an upcoming film will NEVER be a FA or even an GA. Ravensfire (talk) 16:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Your Teahouse question
No one answered, but I'm not clear about what you were asking. You wanted help with a template related to railway lines.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Amazing Spider-Man 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
The article The Amazing Spider-Man 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Amazing Spider-Man 2 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 15:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sanjay Gupta (Director), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. I see that adjacent edits stating "unsourced" as the reasons for removal. As the content removed is definitely sourced, and ", please refrain from doing so again.Zhanzhao (talk) 09:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Rock a Bye Baby Nursery.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rock a Bye Baby Nursery.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SabreBD (talk) 17:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Birdman live.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Birdman live.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 02:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, D'SuperHero. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Just curious, where did you find File:AgnosticAtheismMark.png. Do you know what website you found it on? You said on the image page that it was to be used on Tu Tu Main Main, but it does not appear that it was added there. It is currently used on Agnostic atheism. The image page probably should be updated. Thank you (please ping?) Jim1138 (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
The file page does say it is for "Agnostic atheism". The Tu Tu Main Main was on your comment. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, you will be glad to know that I have nominated the above list for FLC (See here). I have removed the promotional TV appearances you had added and worked on the lead. I hope you will leave some comments there. Thanks, --Skr15081997 (talk) 04:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
D'SuperHeroo now exists, and is a sock of someone else, at least what I think. Is this your account? —JJBers 14:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
No buddy. I am damn sure this is sock of Rajeshbieee for sure as he is defending his film. Probably making me famous. Do report him to sock investigations. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 14:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:9XO logo.jpg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:9XO logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:AgnosticAtheismMark.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:ZeeNews.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:9X Jhakaas.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, D'SuperHero. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
Hello, D'SuperHero. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, D'SuperHero. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:9X Tashan.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Willy1018 (talk) 14:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect (Actor) Imran Aslam. Since you had some involvement with the (Actor) Imran Aslam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MarkYabloko 11:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.
Please be careful not to add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Ajay Devgan filmography at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yash! 10:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
; see Talk:Aamir Khan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 07:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 18:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Amazing Spider-Man 2 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 15:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sanjay Gupta (Director), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. I see that adjacent edits stating "unsourced" as the reasons for removal. As the content removed is definitely sourced, and ", please refrain from doing so again. Zhanzhao (talk) 09:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
; see Talk:The Amazing Spider-Man 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 04:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
