User talk:Cookieivette7

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cookieivette7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lovestruck: The Musical, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Mike moral ♪♫ 01:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lovestruck: The Musical[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Lovestruck: The Musical, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Mike moral ♪♫ 01:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lovestruck: the musical[edit]

Hello Cookieivette7,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Lovestruck: the musical, may be copied from http://www.tvequals.com/2013/04/21/tv-movie-lovestruck-the-musical-abc-family-starring-jane-seymour-sara-paxton-drew-seeley-chelsea-kane/. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 02:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lovestruck: the musical[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lovestruck: the musical requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 02:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Lovestruck: the musical. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 02:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lovestruck: the musical may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Lovestruck: the musical. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 03:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lovestruck[edit]

Although the page was deleted, please don't feel distraught about it. You can work on making the page at WP:Articles for creation a project designed to help newcomers write their first article. Also, feel free join us at the Teahouse where you can ask experienced Wikipedia editors questions about how Wikipedia works or for advice on anything Wikipedia-related. So, I hope you will still try to contribute to Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me at my user talk page. —Mike moral ♪♫ 06:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lovestruck: The Musical[edit]

Hello Cookieivette7. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. You cannot copy and paste information from a website to Wikipedia since it violates that website's copyright. Information has to be in your own words, paraphrased from the original source content. Your article has been tagged with {{copypaste}}. Please rewrite the the "Plot" section so it can meet Wikipeda's requirements. If you need help, ask me on my talkpage or place {{helpme}} on you page with whatever question you have. You can also join us at the Wikipedia:Teahouse and ask for help there. —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note You uploaded a redundant image, File:Lovestruck- The Musical.jpeg. I tagged it for deletion per CSD criterion F1. —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Prima-J-u04.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Prima-J-u04.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lovestruck: The Musical[edit]

I'm happy to see that Lovestruck: The Musical survived the attempt to delete it. However, I reviewed the plot that you added. While I see that you did not literally copy and paste from this site, the wording is too close to the original, and IMO, constitutes a Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. If it was not the case that WP:CP is badly swamped, I would try to do a rewrite on my own. However, there are so many copyright issues that I am simply going to remove the problematic section, but I am letting you know so you can replace it with an acceptable version. Please contact me if you want some tips, although much of what I would say is at the link.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 19:19, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Meagan Holder.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Meagan Holder.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]