User talk:CollisionCourse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edits to Haley Lu Richardson[edit]

Saw your big delete/edit. Please explain. Also, did you delete the photo? This was acquired from Ms. Richardson as she holds all usage/rights as work for hire. This was clearly on the PERMISSIONS sent to permissions@wikipedia.com Thanks for your reply.

Vvaliquette (talk) 00:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I put everything that was in the intro into different sections, early life, career, etc. Also, the picture had been deleted, so I removed it from the infobox. -- CollisionCourse (talk) 03:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FNR4[edit]

Cool, thanks! Not one of the edits adding the release date had used a source! Thanks! Fin© 10:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Atlanta Caps[edit]

I got much of my information for changing the cap from the link below.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=lukas/090402&sportCat=mlb

I had to scour the Braves webiste images to find one of the standard away uniform, but I found it, and they do use the all navy cap. Holy crap, they seem to be phasing it out! I had to go to halfway through last month to find an away game where they didn't use their alternate navy uniform. They might just be going through a uniform identity crisis, like the Mets have been going through for the past ten years or so, completely losing grasp on the meaning of the term "home uniform". Shame, since it's such a nice home uniform they have. Glad the Yanks have stuck with the classic home pinstripes and away grays instead of messing with all this alternate uniform mess.

Also glad to see that I'm not the only one who has a completely scattered sense of team loyalty. Check out the teams on my page. LOL --The Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 07:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeedly. Live a bit up the Hudson from the city, an hour and ten minutes from the Stadium on the Thruway/Major Deegan. Been a Yankees fan always. Sorry about 96... and 99. >_> --The Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan[edit]

The userbox is {{User:Paulinho28/MJ}} Nableezy (talk) 12:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help anybody who is rational (translation, anybody who acknowledges Jordan for what he was is, the greatest of all time) Nableezy (talk) 21:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

La La[edit]

Hi, thanks for your edits on La La (entertainer)‎. You added her birthdate, and indicated a source in the edit summary, but I do not see that source anywhere in the article. This will make it hard for someone to verify the information later. I am going to undue your edit for now, but feel free to add it back if you have a verifiable and reliable source. Just put the source in between two ref tags. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 14:48, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's kind of tough to use Twitter as a reference because she can easily delete the update that confirms her birth date. CollisionCourse (talk) 16:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I suppose this will have to wait until there is a better source. Thanks again. Plastikspork (talk) 13:44, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

La La pt.2[edit]

How you doing, CollisionCourse? Thank you for your message. I checked out your contributions and you are definitely a good-faithed editor, besides anyone who likes the same teams and sports that I like has got to be an outstanding person (smile).

You wrote:

"I got that Facebook link from her official website. Seemed pretty reliable to me. CollisionCourse (talk) 09:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)"[reply]

  • The problem with "Facebook" is that anyone can write whatever they wish there and that is why Wikipedia doesn't deem it as a reliable source even if it cites an "official website" :Reliable sources, then the problem with the so-called "official websites" is that these are usually run and posted by self appointed fan club presidents which in turn makes them biased and non-reliable verifiable sources: Verifiable sources. Someone, claiming to be "La La" herself has even requested that her year of birth be deleted altogether, because she claims that it may affect her chances in pursuing an acting career, but unless that person can prove without a doubt that she is "La La", that is not going to happen.

Since you are a big Michael Jordan fan, here is a picture for your enjoyment which I took years ago in Scottsdale, Az.

Michael Jordan while playing with the Scottsdale Scorpions.

Take care, Tony the Marine (talk) 01:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Austin[edit]

Stone Cold Steve Austin has been proposed to be moved to Steve Austin (actor). You are invited to discuss about this move proposal in the article's talk page. Thank you. Wiikipedian 11:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Your addition to List of Greek episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied from TV Guide: http://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/greek/episodes-season-4/288645 Logical Fuzz (talk) 09:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I got the information from my cable TV; but I see your point. CollisionCourse (talk) 15:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making it a sortable table! I had no clue how that was done, and it looks really good! Thanks :) --JKaizer (talk) 23:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Kat Dennings does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 19:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Ali Cobrin[edit]

I found that you created and published an article for Ali Cobrin a day after mine was submitted for review. As such, I'm merging my information with yours and denoting that I am the original author of this article. Request has already been sent in to the admins. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedo7177 (talkcontribs) 07:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Didn't think anyone was going to create an article for her, so I went ahead and created one. -- CollisionCourse (talk) 07:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks for your understanding. Yeah, I was surprised nobody had made one for her, as well. (Danilo Tadeo 09:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedo7177 (talkcontribs)

So I'm now in direct conversation with Ali Cobrin, as she is following me on twitter. And so I'll be filling in biographical information that she will directly provide. I'm not sure how this will all work in terms of validating information, however. (Danilo Tadeo 04:29, 10 April 2012 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedo7177 (talkcontribs)

I think any info taken from her Twitter should be valid. I mean, she isn't verified, but she gives her official Twitter on her website. -- CollisionCourse (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
First off, CollisionCourse a distinction between someone's legal name and professional name is necessary, I reverted your edit. Also Tedo7177, twitter is acceptable but must avoided if at all possible, you must source it anyway if you add information from it.--Rockchalk717 (talk) 15:19, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was just following what I saw on Demi Lovato's article. Her full name (Demetria Devonne Lovato) and what she goes by (Demi Lovato), were all in one line. -- CollisionCourse (talk) 21:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Sandra Luesse[edit]

Hey CollisionCourse! Thanks so much for your edits on my wiki! It's so much more robust now!

I was hoping that I could ask you to help me by adding a photo of me... I cannot upload them because I do not have authorization. Additionally, there is a distinction that I wanted to make - my stage name is Sandra Carolina and my DJ name is Lady Splash. If I may make a suggestion... I really like this headshot: http://www.google.com/imgres?um=1&hl=en&sa=N&tbo=d&authuser=0&biw=1092&bih=522&tbm=isch&tbnid=nJ2xcV1D8MKBbM:&imgrefurl=http://www.eviltwinltd.com/Monk/interview29.htm&docid=6lZHcujIEglW5M&imgurl=http://www.eviltwinltd.com/Monk/graphics/interviews/Luesse_Sandra/Luesse_Sandra3.jpg&w=595&h=400&ei=6YlSUKjdDsasiQLK5IH4Cw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=611&vpy=146&dur=989&hovh=184&hovw=275&tx=165&ty=116&sig=107171723531293044739&page=1&tbnh=152&tbnw=195&start=0&ndsp=16&ved=1t:429,r:13,s:0,i:134 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandraluesse (talkcontribs) 01:37, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sandra (if this is actually Sandra)! I'd like to help you out with the picture, but I don't have much experience with the whole uploading process. -- CollisionCourse (talk) 04:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WWE '14 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WWE '14 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE '14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JC · Xbox · Talk · Contributions 03:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, CollisionCourse. You have new messages at Talk:Vanessa Morgan.
Message added 16:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I undid one of your edits and explained why on the talk page Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brooke Nevin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supernatural (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blair Redford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Other Side (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Question[edit]

Hello, I've noticed that you've made several edits to various actors/actresses pages and I wanted to see if I could get your input on an actors page I recently made contributions to "Eric Hennig". Thank you and happy holidays. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entertainment4u2013 (talkcontribs) 04:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milana Vayntrub, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ER. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brooke Burke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock Me Baby. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, CollisionCourse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, CollisionCourse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, CollisionCourse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, CollisionCourse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrea Bogart for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Bogart, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Bogart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]