User talk:cocomonkilla

Welcome!

Hello, Cocomonkilla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to RuneScape combat, a RuneScape-related article on Wikipedia. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Also, consider joining our Wikiproject. Again, welcome! :-) CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 22:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup[edit]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 13:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Singh[edit]

You beat me to it! Citedcover (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cocomonkilla, Citedcover has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Top of the Town[edit]

Hi. Great job in new page patrolling. One thing, however. This speedy deletion tag was incorrect. There are multiple problems with the article, but "nonsense" is not one of them. Best,--brew crewer (yada, yada) 21:41, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't make any sense. --Cocomonkilla ^{(talk) (contrib)} 22:53, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene Ingram[edit]

I'm terribly sorry for not making the notability clear upon creation of the page. Could you please review it and see if my attempts are satisfiable? If not, please give some suggestions. DoccAnon (talk) 19:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re message about comments on my talk page[edit]

Commonkilla,

Thanksfor your thoughts. If you don't mind, may I ask to what you were referring in this general statement? Second thing you could help me with is: How do you find out who is the poster or editor of a particular page, andthe precise method of 'talk'? I know how to read and answer on my own talk - at least, I think I do, but how do I contact others?? Thank you very much. I would greatly appreciate some help on this.

- Kindly Denidowi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denidowi (talk • contribs) 22:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article 'Mormonism'[edit]

I believe what I am asking here is: Who posted the article 'Mormonism' on Wikipedia??

The article, read with any insight at all, is very clearly biased.

It is biased insofar as, because of its extremely heavy and unrepresentative inclination towards the few controversial and possibly, "political" issues (and generally-speaking, Mormonism isvery 'unpolitical'), especially over such a very small overall entry on the subject, meaning and lifestyle of "Mormonism", which is what you would have to represent if you were to write about a people fairly - their beliefs and the living of that code (as I say), because of that warpedness of description, it would be geared towards driving anyone away from the religion and its lifestyle. It is just quite unrepresentative of the reality.

Such a treatment of a people cannot possibly represent the detached, objective treatment of a subject demanded by the Wikipedian code.

If a person was to overly represent biases or the controversial like that about another group, you would have to enter 10 times as much material as the article has in order to represent the real lifestyle in context, as opposed to its few 'controversial' issues.

As far as the reality of 'Mormonism' goes, it is a religion and people that truly believe in trying to represent the Saviour's teachings at every turn, as best they can. It is a church and people totally committed from day to day in trying and live the Christlike life and help other people, regardless of religion, faith, race, colour, creed, political persuasion, sex or background. It is very much a conservative lifestyle and belief. Some beliefs on the Restoration itself and the meaning of the 'Priesthood' are probably very radical, but in terms of day-to-day actions and living and assisting of the law, and society's codes, it is very conservative. In this article, it has been billed as a quite radical or a very controversial life. This is just not so at all. People live very ordinary lives.

What could best be said of Mormonism is that it is a religion highly centralized in family living and of promoting the import of family within society. If there is one thing that could be said in describing Mormonism, that is certainly it. Mormons believe that God's Heavenly Kingdom is build around the concept of family - that we are here to learn, practice and prepare to live in families - that families, when sealed under the hand of God, are Forever - that when Jesus Christ said, "Be ye therefore perfect even as your Father in Heaven is perfect," He meant it as a real charge and challenge for us to work towards. I think the person placing the article would have been much better off to include the Church's "Family Proclamation", presented for the vote and acceptance of the entire Church, in 1995.

Having said that, that is probably another defining factor of the Church: the practice and teaching of "common consent".

There is a whole vastness of useful more representative information that could and should have been said on the topic that far better represents Mormonism than the unjust, politically-biased, unreal treatment given. Mormonism is just not a political movement at all.

Kind regards, Denidowi (Denidowi (talk) 03:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denidowi (talk • contribs) 03:01, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well. you're too fast. I was looking for the delation template. Pedro Felipe (talk) 22:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC) Thanks!Pedro Felipe (talk) 22:52, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Rush Hour In Compton I had just finished Googling it and found you had already beat me to the G3, damn your fast. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you![edit]

Good job on NPPing! Just wondering, because I'm looking through your edit history, do you plan on editing Wikipedia for, like, a longer period than one day of editing per year? Thanks! Lixxx235 (talk) 20:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No — cocomonkilla | talk | contrib 01:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Cocomonkilla. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]