User talk:Classicjupiter2

; Archives
	Archive 1;

Mediation Cabal[edit]

Hi there. I've volunteered to be the mediator in the case surrounding the alleged NPOV and edit wars surrounding the Surrealism article after a request for informal mediation by another user. I've had a brief read through the talk pages and background, but it would be very helpful if you could give me a semi-detailed summary of all the events; including the links being referred to, any alternative user names and if possible the past reverts that have the controversial material. In the mean time I will contact the other users involved and do some more research. Feel free to reply on my talk page, or under this comment (although I'd be very greatful if you could acknowledge this message). Also, please be advised that this is an entirely voluntary procedure designed to prevent smaller edit conflicts from going to formal mediation or arbitration, and may be in your best interests, so please give consideration to participating. Thanks. Jem 21:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know there are some proposals on the Surrealism talk page. Have a look there and add your opinions. Jem 12:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block[edit]

Regarding reversions[1] made on January 27 2007 to Surrealism[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 48 hours. William M. Connolley 21:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Classicjupiter2 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Jem 22:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are within your rights to file a counter case, and to do so simply follow the guidelnes laid down here. It is self explanatory, but you must make sure you have a large amount of evidence. Jem 07:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keith, here are the results of the checkuser analysis: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Classicjupiter2 --TextureSavant 20:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SSP case[edit]

Hi, you recently filed a case of suspected sock puppetry on the WP:SSP page, but did not fill out the evidence page. If you wish to pursue this, please refile the case and follow all the steps listed on the page. If you need assistance in doing this, please contact me. Thanks. --Akhilleus (talk) 06:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, where's the evidence Keith? TheEvilPanda 20:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:ANI[edit]

A discussion is underway at ANI. Navou ^banter / _{review me} 21:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]