User talk:Chip123456/Archive 21
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Arnold Hermann Ludwig Heeren entry
I am writing a book on 19th century German philosophies of history.
One of my main subjects is Arnold Hermann Ludwig Heeren. The existing article in Wikipedia was a stub -- just a reprint of a couple of paragraphs from outdated English-language sources. Since I want Heeren to be better known in English-language historical research, I took the time to print down and translate von Wegler's article on Heeren from the Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie -- a public domain and definitive German work something like our 11th edition of the Encylopedia Brittanica.
Being new as a Wikipedia contributor, I had some difficulty figuring out formatting. In fact, I spent a good deal of time on the translation and a whole day today getting it up on the English Wikipedia with an included reference to the ADB original. I inserted hyperlinks to every Wikipedia article in English dealing with the people Heeren knew, his Gottingen colleagues, his translator for the National Institute of France prize he won, etc. It has been a long day. I then went to show my wife the results of my 10 hrs work for the greater good of universally-available knowledge and you had removed the article.
I'm sure this is due to some formatting mistake I made in putting up the Heeren article. If that's how Wikipedia deals with people who are trying to enrich the knowledge base represented by online research, I guess I'll just have to deal with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.40.248 (talk) 21:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hello. Unfortunately, the information you added was unsourced. Please see WP:SOURCE. You need to make sure all of the information is relevant, written coherently and ensure that all sources are reliable. I know you put in the effort, and we appreciate it. However, it does need to be backed up with evidence. Thanks, --Chip123456 21:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Fine. I'll put the Heeren article up on my university web page -- people will be able to find it easily enough through Google -- with an note that it was removed from Wikipedia by "Chip123456" for some indiscernible reason. (The article is in fact sourced. Did you happen to look under "References"?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.40.248 (talk) 21:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- They need to be formatted properly. They weren't sources which you collected for the info. See this. --Chip123456 21:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Chip, old man, you're not listening. See yourself at: http://rci.rutgers.edu/~wcd/Heeren.html
One expects that you'll have your own fan club soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.40.248 (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- I've tried to explain to you. If you still have a problem, raise the issue on the article talk page.--Chip123456 19:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Talkback - X201
Message added 09:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones - Replying
Message added 20:45, 24 February 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Chip123456 20:45, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- You've got mail too! Read your e-mail and replied – Gareth Griffith-Jones – The WelshBuzzard – 08:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Sarnia, Possible run at FA Status
Just wanted to get your opinion on Sarnia. I am interested in obtaining FA status. You did my GA review and passed me, so I value your opinion. Let me know when you have a moment or four.There can be only one...TheKurgan (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Don't edit here much, so probably best to get others'. Apologies.--Chip123456 12:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to see that you're not here often, Chip123456. We worked well together on the GA status. See you around.There can be only one...TheKurgan (talk) 20:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)