User talk:Chester polarbear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Breast do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Noah 03:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Sexual attraction, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Quaeler (talk) 06:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources[edit]

Thanks for adding sources to Wikipedia. It's important that all info on Wikipedia be verifiable; however, we do have a policy on reliable sources, whereas most blogs and self-published sites aren't valid references. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarian Democrat[edit]

Thanks for questioning the Bill Maher reference. I've added two references about his libertarian progressive opinions.David Nelson (talk) 06:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Florrie Fisher birthdate[edit]

Hello-- I saw you recently added a birthdate to the Florrie Fisher biography. Can you provide a reliable source for that date? Thanks! Jokestress (talk) 06:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding that source! Unfortunately, IMDb is not considered a reliable source, so I have removed it. We need a book or newspaper article. If you have any questions, please check out the reliable source policy. Thanks! Jokestress (talk) 18:08, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. The source you just added is also not a reliable source, unfortunately. It had a bunch of misinformation about her later life until I updated this Wikipedia article with the Rotarian epilogue that reported her death. If you find a book or news article (not a website) that meets the reliable source policy, we can definitely use that. I spent a lot of time looking, and the best I could find was her autobiography, which is not consistent about her age. Jokestress (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. There is no reliable source found to date that states Florrie Fisher's birth date is September 18. A website that guesses this is not based on any verifiable information in a reliable published source. Her year of birth has been given as 1918 or 1920 in published sources, but I am not aware of an actual date given. If you have a source that is reliable and verifiable (not a website), we can add that date. Otherwise it is someone's random guess and can't be added as far as Wikipedia is concerned. I know it's annoying, but we have this policy in place so that we do not spread possible misinformation. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks again for other work on the article. Jokestress (talk) 19:22, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

World War II vets[edit]

Thank you for all your work on the patchy vets of World War II article. It really needed work. Czolgolz (talk) 01:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing edits to Sexual Objectification[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that whenever I put up any edits or additions to the Sexual Objectification page (including those with references), that you take them down. I'm a little confused about why that is; could you please let me know? Tebbe (talk) 04:55, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I received your message saying that you found these paragraphs to be irrelevant. I respectfully disagree with this, as I actually find them to be quite relevant to the topic. I'm not sure if there is a better forum for us to have this discussion, but I wasn't able to find a way to message you directly. Tebbe (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tough Guys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijacking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerry Springer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deployed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Composite character, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Nurse Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of anti-war songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Snoopy vs. The Red Baron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of impostors may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Iron Eyes Cody]], [[Italian American]] actor (the "crying Indian" in anti-litter [[public service announcements]] (PSA) who claimed to be a [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Downtown (Lady Antebellum song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • no longer "take [her] downtown" for a night on the town or perform [[cunnilingus]] on her.<ref>[{{cite news|url=http://thebull.cbslocal.com/2013/04/08/lady-as-song-downtown-is-a-song-about-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of anti-war songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Beloved. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Chester polarbear. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Chester polarbear. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Chester polarbear. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]