User talk:Chasezhang2.0

This is Chasezhang2.0's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juvare (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not make a credible claim of significance. This draft would be subject to speedy deletion in article space. If this draft is resubmitted in its current form or a similar form, it should be nominated for deletion.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the company.

WHAT?

This draft reads like an advertisement, but Wikipedia is not for advertising.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chasezhang2.0! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Juvare[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Juvare, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I noticed that you recently removed content from Collaborative Fusion without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Collaborative Fusion, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oshwah~~ - stop undoing my edits. The two companies are separate and now operate under different business entities and LLCs. DO NOT UNDO my edits again. The edits are designed to separate out the two different companies to avoid confusion to the general public and meant to be educational to either companies.

If that is the case, then please provide an edit summary when removing the information, and I recommend bringing the matter up at Talk:Collaborative Fusion and get input on the matter there.💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 14:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]