User talk:ChaseF
Welcome![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, ChaseF! Thank you for your contributions. I am Doug Weller and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Doug Weller talk 11:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
ChaseF, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi ChaseF! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC) |
Orion correlation theory[edit]
Hi - besides the fact that most geologists who have studied the Sphinx disagree with what you wrote, we have a policy called no original research and another called WP:VERIFY which you should read. In a nutshell, sources almost always need to discuss the subject of the article. They also need to meet our criteria at WP:RS. In my early days I was reverted for not understanding this. Doug Weller talk 11:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Do you have a source that it was officially renamed?Garuda28 (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Garuda28: It might all be considered circumstantial, but all the units that maintained, operated, and controlled the Satellite Control Network were reassigned to the Space Force (which is why Space Force handles GPS now). Now that the Satellite Control Network is under complete control by the U.S. Space Force; it could be inferred through evidence that it's now the Space Force's Satellite Control Network. Also, a more direct source would be found in the "Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2020" where it lists the Sat control network as "Satellite Control Network (Space)" where in other older DoD documents, it lists the program as the "Air Force Satellite Control Network"ChaseF (talk) 09:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to White House COVID-19 outbreak. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Veikk0.ma 22:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
@Veikk0.ma: Hi Veikk0, where in my edits did I add my own personal analysis? Everything is documented and cited and NPOV says all sides should be considered with facts. One person's opinion is not a fact and its being misrepresented as one. Please do not let wikipedia turn partisan, it should show facts not opinions Wikipedia:Facts precede opinions. Also Template:Opinion, Dr Fauci saying it "could have been prevented is simply his opinion and based on no empirical evidence, just his thoughts and beliefs. ChaseF (talk) 23:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- What you're doing is disruptive editing. Please stop doing it.
- Public health experts having said that the outbreak was preventable is a fact, not an opinion, so your use of the Opinion tag was incorrect.
- You added a claim to the article that was 100% your own opinion and not stated in any of the sources you pointed to (prevention of the outbreak being unlikely).
- You also removed the claim that multiple public health experts had stated the outbreak was preventable and attempted to characterise it as the opinion of one person, when a section in the article gives multiple sourced examples of other experts saying the same thing. You even repeated this after I undid your edit.
- Please stop and think before making edits. At the very least you should check the article for relevant information before adding claims to the article that contradict information already in it. --Veikk0.ma 08:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@Veikk0.ma: Statements that people make, even public health experts ARE opinions; believing something just because of their title is called an Argument from authority. Statements are only facts when they are presented with facts/evidence, which is not given in the article or its citations. Presenting opinions as facts is against wikipedia's guidelines. Please don't make wikipedia partisan. ChaseF (talk) 19:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Your statements here have made it quite clear that you've not understood Wikipedia's policies. I suggest you read through the Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view pages. Regarding your recent edits, I suggest having a look at WP:RSOPINION.
- If you continue acting as you have, you'll likely have a difficult time editing articles, since your actions are in opposition of Wikipedia's policies. --Veikk0.ma 09:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Standard ArbCom sanctions notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Newimpartial (talk) 19:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)