User talk:Charlotte Hobbs

Charlotte, I just got your message about having (quite graciously, in my opinion) added an article about me. I am right in the midst of a few days of meetings and won't be able to read it carefully and make any suggested changes until early next week. I'm rather impressed that you dug up this information. My only suggestion right now is that you take out the word "prominent" in the introduction, since I don't think that's really accurate. But I appreciate what you've done. Jeremy J. Shapiro 06:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Shapiroherbert640pxw.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shapiroherbert640pxw.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Xerox Star and OpenDoc[edit]

It appears (I can't understand diff) that you added a comment to the OpenDoc article to the effect that OpenDoc was inspired by the Xerox Star. I do not believe this is the case, and it is definitely at odds with the published history. Do you have a source for this claim? Maury 21:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]