User talk:Chaklalajob

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chaklalajob. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 09:14, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dubbo International Body Building Championships[edit]

The article Dubbo International Body Building Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

promotional article failing WP:CORPDEPTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked temporarily from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bilby (talk) 14:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anton Tagliaferro[edit]

A tag has been placed on Anton Tagliaferro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

— this puff piece was created by indef-blocked sockpuppeteer User:Chaklalajob. Such articles are forbidden per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION; therefore, please delete per WP:G11

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 02:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lloyd Bancaire[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lloyd Bancaire, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

— this puff piece was created by indef-blocked sockpuppeteer User:Chaklalajob. I have seen convincing proof that Chaklalajob is a paid editor; if you would like to see this proof, drop a note on my talk page. Puff pieces are forbidden per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION; therefore, please delete per WP:G11

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anton Tagliaferro for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anton Tagliaferro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Tagliaferro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 19:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]