User talk:Carinco Tuck

January 2023

Hello Carinco Tuck. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Leo Liu, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Carinco Tuck. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Carinco Tuck|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. HTinC23 (talk) 01:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Carinco Tuck, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Carinco Tuck|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. HTinC23 (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Leo Liu has been nominated for deletion a second time. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leo_Liu_(2nd_nomination) Banks Irk (talk) 20:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mariah200 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mariah200. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 23:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)