User talk:CCamp2013/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, CCamp2013, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Bachelor Pad. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Go Phightins! (talk) 01:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

CCamp2013, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi CCamp2013! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erika DeSalvatore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Amber Kelleher-Andrews

Your addition to Amber Kelleher-Andrews has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Source: [1]. MER-C 09:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

CCamp2013, we moved your Teahouse host profile

Hello CCamp2013! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just Check in and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 03:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hunter Bell (designer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicole M. Christie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicole M. Christie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Erika DeSalvatore

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Erika DeSalvatore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Terron Schaefer

The article Terron Schaefer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Don't believe this person is notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Ben Patton

Hello, CCamp2013,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ben Patton should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Patton .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Winner Is, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breathe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Winner Is, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Get Ready (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Start Snuggle

IRC office hours for wiki-mentors and Snuggle users

Hi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to try out Snuggle and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in #wikimedia-office ^connect on Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC. See the agenda for more info. --EpochFail^{(talk • work)}, Technical 13 (talk), TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:19, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Chase Daniel Campus

A tag has been placed on Template:Chase Daniel Campus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unused, probably a template for a deleted vanity page.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:16, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Breaking tables on Survivor: San Juan del Sur

Hello, I've noticed that you frequently have been breaking tables at Survivor: San Juan del Sur the last couple weeks. I am assuming good faith and respectfully asking that you could please be more careful when updating the table. I strongly suggest you use the preview function when editing tables. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 01:10, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Haha, I've been breaking tables? I did it once on accident today. You've done it too. More than I have, so watch yourself as well. Also, your reply in the "Talk" page of Survivor: San Juan del Sur was very rude saying my argument was nonsense. I STRONGLY suggest maybe try being nice to people on here? CCamp2013 (talk) 01:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

You did it last week too, and then when you someone fixed the table. I may break tables on occasion but when I do, I do not revert people for fixing my edits as you did [2]. All I am asking is that you use preview, please assume good faith. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 02:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

I did not "revert" it. I was trying to edit it to fix a mistake, someone had already fixed it before I got the chance. It wasn't a "revert". It was an edit that undid what the previous editor did that I wasn't aware of. CCamp2013 (talk) 02:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

New teams table for The Voice page

Hi, CCamp2013, how are you? I'm here to talk about the new format of teams table on The Voice (U.S. season 7) page. Besides its weirdness (I mean,there's a cross in the middle of the table), the new table is bad to compare the team's member's elimination history. The old one is better, once you could see the names right above each other. It's much easier to read.

Respectfully, I'm not gonna change it until I get a reply, but I think the old one is better and others think the same, once they already have undone the change you made. My regards, --Phill ad (talk) 21:39, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Phill ad! I'm doing quite well thank you. I hope you are doing fine as well. Thank you for taking the time to discuss this matter with me on my personal page, however, this is already in discussion on Talk:The Voice (U.S. season 7) page where I have received some positive feedback on the new table. Please, take your concerns on that page and if others disagree (a majority) with the changes I would be glad to change it back. I just didn't like the old table because, for me, it was hard to read, but I also understand that not everyone has the same opinion as I do. Thank you. CCamp2013 (talk) 23:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CCamp2013/Favorite Movies

A tag has been placed on User:CCamp2013/Favorite Movies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it contains a gallery in the userspace which consists chiefly of fair use or non-free images. For legal reasons, we cannot allow non-free and copyrighted images to be used on user pages, and user pages containing galleries of such images may be eligible for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

American Idol

Please do not add a table that has been discussed many times, and is unwanted and ugly. Also note that per MOS:COLLAPSE, Wikipedia recommends that tables that consolidate information covered in the main text to be collapsible. Hzh (talk) 11:07, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

@Hzh:, can you please link me to where this has been discussed? Thanks CCamp2013 (talk) 20:42, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

There have been plenty of discussion about tables on American Idol, whether it's about judges or contestants, and tables are deleted all the time. In the discussion here and here on American Idol talk page on tables and whether to remove them (see also here for many previous discussions on various tables). As for the current one, the discussion is usually in individual's talk page, for example the one here in my talk page here (there are others in other people's talk page when they insists on putting a table here). As stated there, I would prefer to have no table, the table currently is there because others insists on putting a table and lists, like here (quite hideous) and here (messy list), here, and many others. Delete the table if you must, but don't replace it with another, there is no consensus for a new table. At the moment it is small and collapsed, so would be preferable to those who don't want to see a table there. The subject has been done to death, but if you insist on a new table, start another discussion on the American Idol talk page. Hzh (talk) 22:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

@Hzh:, thank you for the very detailed reply. I appreciate it. I, however, don't like the table that exists there now, I will leave it be until, I or someone else, find a better solution and will talk about it accordingly in the talk page. Thanks, CCamp2013 (talk) 00:41, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Carter (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genesis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I am Ian, bureaucrat of the Survivor Wiki (wikia username: IAmNothing712)

I would like to invite you to help out in the Survivor Wiki. It would be an honor to have you as a contributor to one of the most known Survivor-related encyclopedia online. Your quick response will be greatly appreciated. Thank you and good day. Iankevinsevilla (talk) 06:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Natalie Anderson (TV personality)

The article Natalie Anderson (TV personality) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Winning survivor does not instantly make the person notable, rather than place this up for AfD I feel that 7 days is enough to see what develops

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Popular vote in democratic primary

Your recent good-faith edit to Template:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 was reverted because a debate is underway to decide whether the popular vote should be included. You can voice your opinion on the relevant talk page. — JFG ^talk 17:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael James Shaw

The article Michael James Shaw has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Note-we no longer use persondata

Persondata's are no longer used on Wikipedia, so you don't need to put them on pages! Thank you! Wgolf (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Check the news again

John Kasich suspended his campaign. The Hash Smoking Stoner (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

@The Hash Smoking Stoner: Im watching CNN right now, he says John Kasich TO suspend his campaign, he has not yet done so. They are saying he will do so at 5. Wait until then. CCamp2013 (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your AfD of 43nd People's Choice Awards

I have moved your AfD for 43nd People's Choice Awards from AfD to redirects for discussion, as the page is a redirect. The new discussion can be found here. —  crh ₂₃  (Talk) 10:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coupled (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tindr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

43rd People's Choice Awards listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 43rd People's Choice Awards. Since you had some involvement with the 43rd People's Choice Awards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

42nd People's Choice Awards

StealthForce changed it again; he's been doing this persistently, when Outlander won the Best Sci-Fi show. Thought I'd bring this to your attention. Please revert his edit. Thank you. 2601:601:4002:E260:6DF0:955D:A138:95C1 (talk) 02:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at 42nd People's Choice Awards shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. I understand you may think you're correct, but you can and will be blocked under the three revert rule. Please stop reverting and we'll sort out what's going on, thank you -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 08:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

If you have more arguments for your view of these contestant lists, you may want to add them at User talk:BrandonT0421. I assume you are speaking about some kind of WikiProject consensus, when you say "The occupational description should be concise and not content awards" ? EdJohnston (talk) 22:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Both parties warned

Your edit warring complaint has been closed. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:BrandonT0421 reported by User:CCamp2013 (Result: Both warned). Please see the advice there. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 17:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Revert at Samit garg

Hi CCamp2013, regarding the revert you made to Samit garg. When the user who created an article blanks it, you can tag it for speedy deletion per WP:G7 rather than revert their edit. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Message on my wall

Ccamp, I take full blame for the reverts. Because I was on Huggle (which I know isn't an excuse), I didn't know that the user was the one to create the page. I take full blame for the edit war (which I didn't notice by the way) and will seize editing that page. Thanks for notifying me. Happy editing! 3primetime3 (talk) 06:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

List of world's longest vines.

You caught me at the exact moment I was establishing a new page, and I clumsily misused some code. I went away from the page for a moment to find the correct code, and returned to find your notice. If you examine it now you will find it is sensible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treeenthusiast (talk • contribs) 07:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Cut and paste moves

Hello, recently I saw you created Life (2017 film) by copying the contents from Draft: Life (2017 film). I have redirected the article to Skydance Media because filming has not yet begun, but another important thing to note is that this was essentially a cut and paste move, which are not allowed. Instead, what should have happened is that (once filming starts) the draft gets moved into the mainspace. Please read WP:CUTPASTE. I see you also did a cut and paste move to What. Bo Burnham and What.. Cut and paste moves are not encouraged because they split the page history, which must be retained for copyright reasons. If you think an article has a wrong title, but another article already exists at that title, you should instead request a move. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 02:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Dan Wagner

CCAmp2013

Dan Wagner is the subject of vandelism and has been for 2 years. Your assistance appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.78.117 (talk) 22:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

The above 'editor' is Dan Wagner airbrushing his own profile. He removed vast amounts of content added by respected members and moderators. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.164.168 (talk) 06:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Page vandalism

Someone at IP 216.174.45.122 keeps vandalizing Pull-up_(exercise). I saw you fixed it a couple of days ago. How can we prevent this from happening? and still able to edit the records when they are updated. Thanks, Steven Proto https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pull-up_(exercise) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremistpullup (talk • contribs) 18:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BattleBots (Season 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dan Barry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

≥== July 2016 == Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 2015 Copa América. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Two editors have requested that a source be provided, specifically for the ranking positions in the first column and the points totals in the last. Per WP:BURDEN, the correct way to deal with content that has been removed having been challenged as lacking a source is to provide a source, not to simply add back and say "take it to the talk page". Fenix down (talk) 07:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@Fenix down: Why put this after we already made a discussion about it? It seems unnecessary. Chase (talk) 15:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Because you were edit warring before you started the talk page thread and Templateing other editors to tell them to stop hypocritically. Fenix down (talk) 18:48, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@Fenix down: I was not edit warring. I reverted twice and each time told them to take it to the talk page. I was following Wikipedia guidelines. If this is not how the guidelines are meant to be interpreted, they need to be revised and made clearer. Also, before a big chunk of information is deleted for an article that's been there for a while, editors MUST take it to the talk page before deleting it, sourced or not. I wasn't the one that added the information, just enforcing rules. Chase (talk) 19:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Content had been removed by two editors which had been tagged as unreferenced. You added it back twice in contravention of wp:burden without any sourcing. You and several other editors repeatedly removed and added this content back before it was taken to the talk page. You were all engaged in an edit war hence the warning which was given to all involved. Fenix down (talk) 20:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Question

Hi I want to discuss the bb18 page. So basically I feel as if the way the page is edited does not give Natalie credit for her HOH. Michelle should not be listed under "head of household" because she was granted co HOH by a twist. Natalie was the head of household. With her nominations made in bold and her being shown in the voting chart as "Co-Head Of Household" I see it as completely unnecessary to have her shown taking over Natalie's HOH box, making her more prominent since she is listed in bold.

@Bgc7676: I understand that you do not want the changes, however, you need consensus and to talk about the edits on Talk:Big Brother 18 (U.S.) first.Chase (talk) 05:44, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

I made an edit request on the page and it has not been responded to. Is there like a main person who runs the page?

No consensus

Please join the talk page and explain how you arrived at a view that 65% in favor of one image versus 35% for the image you reinstated, is "no consensus". I find it difficult not to see your edit has subverting consensus.- MrX 03:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

WTH?

Your comments about and to me at another editor's talk page are not only inappropriate, they are quite inaccurate. If you have a problem with me, address me directly at my own talk page. Thanks. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

@Winkelvi: I am sorry you feel I was being innappropriate, however, I said nothing to cause offense or intend to hurt you. The fact that I pinged you, not only made it appropraite, but contributed to a discussion that was already being had. Also, your talk page is overrun and unorganized and I deemed it counterproductive to put this matter on there. I find it unwise of you to come at me, when I am mostly on your side on matters, but still think you encouraged (slightly) negative civality. Chase (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Here's an <eye-roll> for you. And a trout.

Whack!

The above is a WikiTrout (Oncorhynchus macrowikipediensis), used to make subtle adjustments to the clue levels of inexperienced Wikipedians.

-- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposal

Actually if you would agree not to address Calibrador directly, ignoring him if he addresses you, I would withdraw your username from my proposal. It's that interaction that has been so unproductive. ―Mandruss ☎ 19:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Absolutely. Chase (talk) 19:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Done. ―Mandruss ☎ 19:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

FYI

Hi, Chase! At the AN thread you wanted to ping me so you used this: [[ping|MelanieN]], which comes out like this: MelanieN. Doesn't work; click it and you'll see. Just so you know, there are two ways to ping someone: with a wikilink as in [[User:MelanieN]], or with the ping template as in {{ping|MelanieN}}. The wikilink uses regular brackets, the ping is a template so it has curly brackets. (There are other abbreviations for the ping template; I think I have seen people use {{yo:MelanieN}} for example - but I stick with the ones I know.) Maybe you already knew this and just forgot; in that case I apologize for giving you a lesson you didn't need. Anyhow, thanks for your input at that page. --MelanieN (talk) 20:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Editing

If you constantly tell me to go to the talk page and discuss how do you expect me to do that when I never receive a reply?? Bgc7676 (talk) 20:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

I mean, I'm not the only one that needs to weigh in. If you can't get the attention of other users, then you are out of luck. Chase (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Not falling for it

Don't pull "ownership" with me when you know full and well that along with making bold edits comes the very real possibility of being reverted, then having to seek consensus on the Talk page. You don't get your feelings hurt, you simply follow protocol. The change you are suggesting would be a major departure from the status quo, and needs to be discussed and commented on in order to be implemented. This is not foreign, this is typical standard. LLArrow (talk) 23:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

User:LLArrow; No. What you are doing on the article is far from reverting bold edits. You're opposing any new change that anyone is proposing, except yourself, and then when you do not get your way, you edit war. This creates a sense of entitlement and ownership over the article and discourages any new editors to want to try to improve the article. That is why I suggested limiting the number of reverts that you do on the article, because if these changes are so un-status quo, someone else will revert it. Please refer to both WP:BATTLEGROUND. Chase (talk) 23:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

I've dealt with your type before. You can ride as high as you'd like on that horse of yours. I'm a policeman, stopping reckless behavior, such as yours, from being bulled into being. If you'd like to interpret that as "ownership" or "entitlement" issues, go right ahead. I'm formulating my case for the administrators as we speak, should you choose to continue this dogging. LLArrow (talk) 23:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Are you kidding me right now? You litterlly just got through telling me that you have not made my editing life a living hell. Guess you had a change of heart huh? LLArrow (talk) 22:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

LLArrow; I was trying to make amends with you and would hope you would change your behavior or at least see it, which I thought was needed since you threatened to report me if I didn't see things your way, but you refused and continued to act the way you have been behaving since your inception into Wikipedia. I also have no problem putting facts in places where facts need to be put. Also, "litterlly" is not a word. Chase (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

You're an instigator, and you have no will to make amends. I never threatened to report you for disagreeing with me, sound's to me that you're twisting my words. But you wouldn't do that now, would you? P.S. apparently auto-correct thinks it is. LLArrow (talk) 22:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

LLArrow; Literally right above. Chase (talk) 22:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

How the hell can you possibly interpret that as threatening to report you for having a difference of opinion? I'm referring to your disruptive, non-consensus actions; and your persistent badgering of me. As I said, twisted. LLArrow (talk) 22:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars

Ok first of all, you are the one disrupting the page and I am fixing the edits you made because the edits you are making are false. If you read what I put on my talk page you would go to the All Stars season 2 talk page and read what everyone has on there. Don't come on here thinking you're going to block me after you are the one making false edits and I am fixing your wrong edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starbucks6789 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

@Starbucks6789: Correction, I have made zero false edits.

Onlyheretoeditallstars2 (talk) 05:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)== AS2? ==

Hey, just wanna say TOP2 looks neater than the WIN you keep changing my edits to. Please just leave it? It's really confusing to see 2 wins on the scoreboard. Just leave it as TOP2. It'll be less messy. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onlyheretoeditallstars2 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Just checking, have you ever actually watched the show? You have an extensive list of the shows you watch (I'm guessing you're bleed over from people who still watch Survivor) and Drag Race isn't listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:146:C180:3FC:6581:62E4:BF4B:1A58 (talk) 20:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Reply to 2601:146:C180:3FC:6581:62E4:BF4B:1A58: I do watch the show, why? Chase (talk) 20:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop putting in spoilers on who won All Stars 2! There's a reason we have a Wiki page specifically for that...you don't need to put the placing of the respective queens in the articles of seasons that AREN'T specifically All Stars 2. If a new fan comes along and has only watched up to season 5, for example, it's a big spoiler if the click article for S5, and see the ranking of queens they haven't watched yet, plus the queens of that season. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.200.1.39 (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Continuing discussion from Alex's talk page as requested

They state in the WP:MOS to take extreme caution when applying the rowspan or colspan. It does not state we shouldn't do it. — Artmanha (talk) 11:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Reply to Artmanha: That is true, but the phrase "Extreme caution" basically means never or rarely. Only in cases where it has to be done should it be used, I think we can get away with it not being used here. Chase|^talk 15:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

That is basically your opinion since the phrase "extreme caution" does not mean, in ANY sense or language, basically never or rarely; it means we must be extra careful in doing it. Please provide arguments validated by Wiki's guidelines and policies that explain why we should not do that. Thank you — Artmanha (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Reply to Artmanha: Please read; Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial/Internal guidelines#Avoiding rowspan/colspan. Thank you. Chase|^talk 16:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• Comment for Artmanha: Also, if you look at all of the Featured List's for videography pages, none of them use "rowspan". I should also point out that I am trying to get this to FL status as well. Chase|^talk 17:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CCamp2013. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Mindy Project.

Hi there! Thanks for helping me out on the One Tree Hill page a while back. Would you be able to help me out again on The Mindy Project page? Another editor is reverting my character table I had made for the article for the reasons of "false" information being displayed. By that, he means 1) an actor appeared as a guest before being promoted to a series regular in the same season and 2) an actor was only in two episodes - apart of the main cast, nonetheless - before departing the show in one season. He states notes should be displayed for these, however, I find it redundant seeing as countless numbers of characters have done this on countless shows, so why should we add in redundant notes? I have set up a section for discussion on the talk page however, he just keeps reverting instead of discussing like he should. So would you be able to take a look and throw in your two cents when you can? I ask 'cause I trust you and we both agree on a lot of things. Let me know :) Thanks! MSMRHurricane (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Reply to MSMRHurricane: I have replied on the page to both of you. I hope we can get this resolved as soon as possible and continue making Wikipedia's content better. --Chase | ^talk 17:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Drag Race

Quick question. On the edit for RuPaul's Drag Race season 2, at 20:48, September 5, 2016, you removed the "Notes" section. Why was this? Just want to be sure because someone's readding them. Oath2order (talk) 00:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Reply to Oath2order:

1. The Notes sections is for clarifying things that happened during the section, what I deleted was Trivia.
2. Trivia does not belong on Wikipedia except in certain situations, in which, it gets a small section on the the main page.
3. Putting the trivia section on the main page, for this type of trivia, seems like we are giving WP:Undue weight to it.

Thank you, Chase | ^talk 22:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

42nd People's Choice Awards

Hi- I've contributed to Wikipedia anonymously over the years, but I opened my own account earlier this year- a few unknown IPs, possibly sockpuppets of the now-banned user StealthForce, keep changing the Favorite Cable TV Sci-Fi/Fantasy Show winner, which was really Outlander, NOT The Walking Dead. Can you do something about this? Thank you. Johnnysama (talk) 17:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Reply to Johnnysama: I will put in a request to protect the page. Thank you. Chase | ^talk 22:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

RuPaul's Drag Race Season 9

Hello, there is currently an ongoing discussion on the season 9 talk page under the subtitle of HIGH and LOW that may interest you in voicing your opinion. Brocicle (talk) 09:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Original Research

It has been discussed to death at this point, but utilizing high/low does not constitute original research. Please adhere to the just established consensus or reach a new consensus before making those changes. Thank you. nihlus kryik (talk) 13:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

As regards this, CCamp2013, please see my note at the very bottom of Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race, following the purple box. User:Nihlus Kryik reverted your edit, and I in turn reverted his since he did not supply RS secondary sources, as the closing statement mandates be supplied. Since he seems to be a very new editor, I would advise keeping an eye out in case he begins edit-warring. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice to all registered editors at RuPaul's Drag Race and Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race this year (2017) that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race#Request for comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Total Divas.

Hi there, would you be able to help me out again? I have refrained from getting into an edit war with another user, but he claims that the (WWE Superstar) label in the recurring table on the Total Divas page is advertising and has removed them... yet to me it's nothing of the matter since it's a label to give viewers knowledge on who that particular person is in relation to the show and the cast. What do you think? MSMRHurricane (talk) 03:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Reply to MSMRHurricane: I have added my input to the page. Thank you, Chase | ^talk 05:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! :) MSMRHurricane (talk) 06:04, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi again, sorry for another message but our "friend" is back and claiming the summary plots for the season pages are advertising and promotional... I don't have much experience dealing with users like this but I will report him. I just would like to ask if you could help me out in fending him off, as he backed off of the cast table after you intervened. Thanks! MSMRHurricane (talk) 21:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Character tables

Hey there, there has been a couple users over on the New Girl page disrupting the character table. One of them has messaged me saying I should not be changing a character credit as they were credited as special guest, yet they appeared in over 3 episodes in that one season, therefore on the table I have made it recurring for that season. That's the way we do it, right? I just thought I'd get some "back up" again, haha. Thanks! MSMRHurricane (talk) 02:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

He is hot

This should be added to his page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.55.86.203 (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Reply to 68.55.86.203: Who is hot? Chase | ^talk 03:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Michael Jackson into Michael Jackson videography. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm TheDoctorWho. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Big Brother (U.S. TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I don't mean to be rude but may I suggest that you do a little research or add some sourced material before changing something that's universal and properly sourced across multiple Wikipedia pages TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ex (TV series) (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Galobtter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Ex (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Galobtter (talk) 06:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello! CCamp2013, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Galobtter (talk) 06:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CCamp2013. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Ex (TV series) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Ex (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Ex (TV series)

Hello, CCamp2013. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Ex".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Chase Campus Senior Picture March 2013.jpg

The file File:Chase Campus Senior Picture March 2013.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly ^hi! 14:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Supergirl (season 2) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supergirl (season 2). Since you had some involvement with the Supergirl (season 2) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CCamp2013. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Total Divas cast table.

Hey there, I was just wondering if you were able to assist me on the latest edits on the Total Divas page. There is a user who claims just because there is not a source to provide for recurring and guest characters, it should entirely be removed with all recurring cast members being reverted to guests. This to me is inaccurate, as they are trying to determine a cast members status based on their personal views. Whereas the difference between a recurring and guest are based on the amount of episodes they appeared in, and the amount of involvement they have with the storyline/main cast members. Also, this seems like a bold edit as every other television show on Wikipedia contains these types of tables, determining main, recurring, and guest characters, so I find it rather silly that this user is targeting this one show yet none of the other shows. Anywho, any assist would be beneficial, and I'm not looking for "back up" as I am open to change, but I want it to be for the right reasons and accurate representations. I do not want to engage in an edit war with them, nor cross any boundaries with Wikipedia. Thanks! MSMRHurricane (talk) 20:17, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Regé-Jean Page for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regé-Jean Page is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regé-Jean Page until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

The Boy Who Came Back to Life listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Boy Who Came Back to Life. Since you had some involvement with the The Boy Who Came Back to Life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

The Brain (Stranger Things) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Brain (Stranger Things). Since you had some involvement with the The Brain (Stranger Things) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

The Lost Brother (Stranger Things) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Lost Brother (Stranger Things). Since you had some involvement with the The Lost Brother (Stranger Things) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

The Palace (Stranger Things) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Palace (Stranger Things). Since you had some involvement with the The Palace (Stranger Things) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

The Pumpkin Patch listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Pumpkin Patch. Since you had some involvement with the The Pumpkin Patch redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

The Secret Cabin listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Secret Cabin. Since you had some involvement with the The Secret Cabin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

The Storm (Stranger Things) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Storm (Stranger Things). Since you had some involvement with the The Storm (Stranger Things) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 13:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NewCA 2016.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NewCA 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello CCamp2013! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

"The Something (2017 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Something (2017 film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 7#The Something (2017 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 19:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Ur gay

	suck your mum
	ugly bitch fuck off u trump supporter just unalive urself hoe Theplugsboy (talk) 20:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)