User talk:Briaryk

Welcome!

Hello, Briaryk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Ron Erhardt have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type {{helpme}} on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Sam Sailor ^Sing 18:25, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Briaryk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 18:24, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Ron Erhardt, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please stop edit-warring on this article and discuss on the article's talk page. Thank you. Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 18:30, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Ron Erhardt. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Matthew Yeager (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Ron Erhardt. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Sam Sailor ^Sing 18:39, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Briaryk. You have new messages at Epicgenius's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ron Erhardt, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ron Erhardt was changed by Briaryk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912483 on 2013-11-12T02:32:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ron Erhardt. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

have tried to be niceand have given two connections to prove my brother,sisters and I are who we say we are but your different editors continue to change it back. Please leave my dad's page alone. You say you accept right of speach and you want the correct information on the page. Please check it out yourself. I do not have to prove that I am his bilogical daughter or that my brother or 2 sisters are biologically connected to him. What I have put on there is correct and I am going to continue to change it weather under this email or another.

Sally Erhardt

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Erhardt[edit]

You were blocked for 24 hours then you went back to do this edit again. Please read over the WIkipedia policies, as it seems that even after I lectured you on my talk page, you did the exact same thing that got you blocked in the first page. If you want, you could re-open the discussion, but don't add unsourced material on BLPs without citations. Thanks, Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 13:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Ron Erhardt. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

The addition of yourself, your siblings, your children, your nephews, and your nieces to the article of your father Ron Erhardt is unsourced and Wikipedia is not a place for such a genealogical record.

Whoever the Jesse family is (judging from context I assume it is the family of Erhardt's second wife), it is absolutely uncalled for that you make accusations in article space as you did in this diff. Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:03, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Ron Erhardt[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 03:36, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]