User talk:Brendanhodge

Welcome!

Hello, Brendanhodge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Slgrandson 22:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pope Pius XII[edit]

Take another look at the Pope Pius XII article. Your recent cut and paste job produced a result which is increasingly repetitive and poorly syntaxed. It gives the promulgation year twice for example. I reverted your edits but please feel free to do whatever you were trying to again in a more holistic way rather than just copying and pasting content. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 23:20, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I like your more recent changes. Thanks for tracking down Pope John Paul's speech. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 04:30, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More CC vs. RCC[edit]

Good Morning, Brendanhodge.

If you are interested, I would like to get a broader conversation started on the CC vs. CC issue over on the Catholicism 101, in part to get other editors into the conv. and in part to rejuvenate Catholicism 101 which has fallen into disuse from what I can tell. Here isthe link: Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Terminology. Thanks for all your work on WP. --Vaquero100 10:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

This is a reminder to go vote by June 7 for the
Catholic Collaboration of the Week.
Support or comment on the current nominations, or nominate an article for collaboration.

Vote in progress to move Counter-Reformation to Catholic Reformation[edit]

This move makes sense because Counter-Reformation implies that that the movement was against reform. Rather as a reform movement within the Catholic Church, it is most precisely known as the Catholic Reformation. This is now the more favored term in academic theological circles.

Please stop by talk:Counter-Reformation for the vote. Thanks, --Vaquero100 19:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Catholicism Assessment[edit]

Hello, fellow WikiProject Catholicism member. The project has recently begun work on assessing articles relating to Catholicism, and you are invited to comment and participate. The subpage for this assessment is located here. Thank you. —Mi ra 07:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church[edit]

There is a vote at Talk:Roman Catholic Church: A Vote on the Title of this Article on moving Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. You are invited to review it. --WikiCats 04:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diocesan Infobox[edit]

To the creators of Diocesan/Archdiocesan articles

I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!!

WikiProject Christianity[edit]

Hello Brendanhodge!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 06:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012[edit]

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Some simple help maybe needed on the new papabili list[edit]

If you have the time and the possibility the new List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave WP article could need some help. You could start by taking a look at the talk page. Thanks Pgarret (talk) 09:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]