User talk:Brandcr

December 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Slow fashion, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, I'm not sure what policies I didn't follow and there was no link really on the topic, but since I'm inside the fashion industry I think that section was needed to be there. Can you please clarify so I can be more helpful here?

Thanks, Brandcr (talk) 23:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Your edit was that "there are minor overlaps between the two branches of fashion" but did not really expand on that; i.e. you did not state any differences, any overlaps, etc. To expand into constructive detail, examples could've been given or what "minimalism or meaningful fashion" is. Hope this helps :) Synorem (talk) 23:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it! Brandcr (talk) 00:52, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Victoria High School (British Columbia). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 23:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just left it in the chat, but I'm not sure what happens next? Someone will review it because the source I included is very clear I think.

Thanks:) Brandcr (talk) 23:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Segan (fashion brand) (January 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources provided are largely non-independent or provide insufficient coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Segan (fashion brand) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review.

I clicked and read the links included but can you please clarify what you meant with "sources provided are largly non-independant"? The articles and links are written and made but third-party sources so if that's considered non-indepndant can you show a dependent source so I can fins similar ones?

Any brand has articles and interviews done on them which are not dependant and if that's not considered dependant then there'e no sources left.

Also, you mentioned the sources were "insufficient" but how do you define sufficient because these are the articles written on the brand and are much more than a few lines, so again if you could provide any example of a "sufficient" coverage it'd be appreciated.

Thanks, and appreciate your time, Brandcr (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brandcr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]