User talk:Bokpasa

Please explain your actions[edit]

As you did on Marinid dynasty and Almoravid dynasty. You marked major edits as minor (And they are definitely not minor by any means). You have not been discussing your edits, and your edit comment here is borderline on personal attacking. - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 10:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bokpassa, if you pull your stunts again, I am going to request a user ban on you. Walrasiad (talk) 18:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Almoravid-Almohad-Marinid-Wattasid-Saadi[edit]

Exactly what is you disagree with in those articles? --Tachfin (talk) 19:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Río Salado[edit]

Could you post an explanation on the talk page of Battle of Rio Salado outlining what issues you have with the article? It helps explain why you have tagged the article as unbalanced. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Almoravid dynasty, you may be blocked from editing.
You seem to not understand that only one country (the most relevant one) should be in those Category generating fields. per Template:Infobox_former_country/doc#Location See examples Austria-Hungary Austrian Empire German Empire
Tachfin (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Bokpasa. You have new messages at Ioeth's talk page.
Message added 23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your 3RR report about Almoravid dynasty[edit]

Hello Bokpasa. I have undone your report, since most of the fields were blank and you didn't say who you were reporting. Please try again if the problem still exists and be sure we can read your report. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Walrasiad (talk) 01:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sock puppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Atama頭 17:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bokpasa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mmm Why am locked out? Because if it is because a person has been found that other user types in the same items that I ... insufficient reason ...

Decline reason:

You are blocked for the reasons explained here: it is confirmed by checkuser that Luciusmaximus (talk) is an account created after you were warned for edit-warring, to make the same disruptive edits. If you create more sockpuppets, or you continue to edit-war about Morocco after your block expires, your next block will be longer, perhaps indefinite. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Walrasiad (talk) 03:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked[edit]

For evading your block per the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa, I've reset your block to two weeks. Next time it will be much longer. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And for evading yet again per evidence at the same SPI page, you're now indefinitely blocked. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jasper Deng (talk) 16:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jasper Deng (talk) 23:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Almohad Empire battles[edit]

Template:Campaignbox Almohad Empire battles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 08:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]