User talk:Blacksmokemonster

Welcome!

Hello, Blacksmokemonster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Doc Quintana (talk) 02:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Calvary Christian Academy[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Calvary Christian Academy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Calvary Christian Academy and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Peridon (talk) 19:22, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old CCA logo[edit]

How did you come to have the old athletics logo for Calvary Christian Academy given to you, since you're claiming rights to it? —C.Fred (talk) 02:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you're now claiming it to be the current logo for jerseys, I'm now very curious as to how you have the rights to this image. —C.Fred (talk) 18:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My previous reply to you seems to have been lost. First I would like to remind you that I am new to Wiki and I am still learning the ropes. The image in question is old, older than any of the staff currently at CCA. As an editor of the schools webpage I have permission to use the schools logo. This logo has no registered copyright of any kind on it and has been used liberally by the school as a Public Domain image with in the confines of the school. I would like to reclassify the image so that it is registered to the school in some way but I am uncertain of what code to put in the license box. I did not mean to attribute the photo to myself, but I simply wished to use the strongest copyright Wiki Commons offered so that I could protect the image from improper distribution. I hope you can understand my situation. Also I was hoping to keep this logo on the page next to the athletic information. Do you know of anyway to do this?----

Regarding placement of the image, once the article starts to fill out and there are more sections, it will sit next to the athletics section. It's pushed down to the first available spot on the right-hand side, and as short as the article is right now, that's pretty much the bottom of the article.

Regarding the license status of the image, you're saying contradictory things. If it's a public domain image, then it can be distributed and used in any way possible: derivative images, commercial reuse, incorporation in parody images, etc. There is no way to regulate the downstream usage of public domain images (or, for that matter, images under Creative Commons or GFDL licenses). If it's not a free image, then it can't be uploaded to Commons. It can be uploaded to Wikipedia, as the current logo is, under a non-free, "fair use" license. That notes the image is available for limited reuse only.

It appears, then, that the school holds the copyright to the image. The question is, what is the school's intention for the image? Do they intend for it to be released into the public domain, do they intend to license it under the very permissive Creative Commons license, or do they intend to retain rights over it, so that it's only usable in the article under a claim of fair use?

One other note: at the end of your messages on talk pages, please type in ~~~~ as the last item of your comment. The four tildes are automatically replaced with your signature and the time of your message. That makes it easier to follow who said each comment and when it was said. Thank you, and happy editing! —C.Fred (talk) 00:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The Academy of Arts Trailer Logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The Academy of Arts Trailer Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:The Academy of Arts Trailer Logo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:The Academy of Arts Trailer Logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 08:40, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Academy of Arts, Inc[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on The Academy of Arts, Inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 23:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patapsco and Back Rivers Railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EMD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Blacksmokemonster. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]