User talk:Beaulosagne

Welcome!

Hello, Beaulosagne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Micronation. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 20:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see precisely one Google hit in English (or in any other language): to your site, which doesn't indicate any sort of notability. Please stop adding the link, or provide appropriate references from third-party sources. Acroterion (talk) 20:59, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 02:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable promotion[edit]

If you continue to insert the reference to "Beaulosagne," I will request that this account be indefinitely blocked as a single-purpose promotional account. Acroterion (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clignett for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clignett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clignett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AKS (talk) 10:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:49, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beaulosagne, you need to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and is not a place for family trees. All pages belong to the Wikipedia Foundation, and all pages and editors must adhere to the rules/policies. Removing information that does not belong in an article is not harassment, it's a responsibility. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]