User talk:BarceloniUK

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Information icon Hello, I'm Filiprino. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Societat Civil Catalana have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.

Hello Filiprino. I think your edits on Societat Civil Catalana page are not constructive but with political intention instead. You are just trying to present an image of the association as if linked with extreme right, using the same and only arguments of separatist activists. I´d appreciate you didn´t keep eliminating my edits the same way as I leave those from you, which I still feel are overweighted versus what can be found about Societat Civil Catalana in diverse sources, not just the pro-independence ones.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Societat Civil Catalana, you may be blocked from editing. I have removed duplicated content from the header of the article. I have modified a phrase to reflect what the sources say. What you wrote was an invention not stated by the references which happens to distort them. The thing is, I have put this warning because you keep adding rejected content with the intention of doing propaganda of SCC, that is, an article written like an advertisement as you already tried to do. Filiprino (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Filiprino: it's shocking that you judge my editting is disruptive when that's exactly what yours is since you first came to edit this wikipedia entry. You completely changed the previous version adding all your biased views which you share with separatists haters of SCC. Judging my proposal as advertising doesn't mean all I wrote is not true, unlike what you write, which is a perfect example of using communication to manipulate rather than inform.

You should read on ad hominem and ad populum falacies. Your arguments do not sustain in facts, you just keep reverting and changing text to suit your initial intention. The provided sources provide photos and videos in addition to the due good labour of periodism made by the media. I do not have anything more to say. Filiprino (talk) 13:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:BarceloniUK. The discussion is about the topic Societat Civil Catalana. Filiprino (talk) 13:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SCC[edit]

We edited at the same time and I'm not sure if my edit is correct. Could you double-check, please? Thanks, Maragm (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Maybe you want to defend yourself here.Saludos, Maragm (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]