User talk:Badassboy 63637

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

  • Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
    • If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
    • Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
    • Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
  • To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
  • You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Badassboy 63637, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Badassboy 63637! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Dukaan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dukaan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page Draft:Dukaan, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vikas Oberoi has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vikas Oberoi. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You can submit the draft to Articles for Creation and see what happens. David notMD (talk) 09:33, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Alt News, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —SpacemanSpiff 16:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samadhan Purti moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Samadhan Purti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jupitus Smart 16:16, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Photo inside samadhan purti store.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Photo inside samadhan purti store.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samadhan Purti (June 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Umakant Bhalerao were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Samadhan Purti, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vikas Oberoi[edit]

Hello, Badassboy 63637

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vikas Oberoi for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 10:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikas Oberoi (June 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 14:56, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikas Oberoi (June 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 16:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of samadhan purti.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of samadhan purti.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Content and refs?[edit]

Two sentences: "In 2014, Vikas Oberoi's company Oberoi Realty was accused to cheat flat buyers. Oberoi refunded all the money to the flat buyers who accused him." Four refs are given, but the three that are in English do not support the sentences. Also, outside of India, no one knows what stamp papers are, so that content is mysterious. David notMD (talk) 10:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Micromax in 1B blue.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Micromax in 1B blue.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Micromax IN 1B.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Micromax IN 1B.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note - Adding a different non-free file doesn't address WP:NFCC#1. Nor does lying about being the copyright holder as you did on Commons somehow make an image acceptable. This repeated addition of policy violating photos is disruptive. Consider this a warning about disruptive editing

File:Koo's transformation from old to new.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Koo's transformation from old to new.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Bilorv (talk) 17:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Campus of Oberoi international school.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Campus of Oberoi international school.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot of official account of koo app.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screenshot of official account of koo app.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Aprameya Radhakrishna co founder of Koo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Aprameya Radhakrishna co founder of Koo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Adani Cement. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 08:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sridhar Vembu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 10:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Badassboy 63637. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Boat Inc., gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Badassboy 63637. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Badassboy 63637|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --- Possibly 07:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I am not a paid editor. I am just a editor like you. I created that article cause its a very notable brand. I add short info at one time that's why you can see a lot of edits on that article. My internet sucks sometimes that's why I write small-small lines in an article and publish it so that I don't lose anything I write. I am just a normal editor from India who likes to contribute to wikipedia as its a great source for information and knowledge and that too for free. Thank you for your concern :) Badassboy 63637 (talk) 07:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vikas Oberoi has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vikas Oberoi. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 04:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have removed Adani's net worth crash section from Gautam Adani as per WP:PROPORTION. As per this, discussions of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and impartial, but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. Net worth will always get changed according to fluctuation in market. So do not give undue weightage to it. Please discuss this before making any changes Thank you Poppified talk 07:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok no problem ☺️ Badassboy 63637 (talk) 03:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Koo Android.png[edit]

Hi, I had added low resolution image because if i added high resolution image, it will be resized by wikipedia bot since it's a copyright material. Correct me if i am wrong. If you give me a resolution which will not be resized by bot, i will update it asap. I really want to put high resolution images, waiting for your reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anoopspeaks (talkcontribs) 12:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He anoop, i have a image that is showed to registered users on android. As your image contains hindi, which is not known by everyone, i will update the orignal image to a new image. Nothing to worry, i have updated it. Thank you!Badassboy 63637 (talk) 12:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi anoop, i have updated the image, you don't have to update it now! Actually your photo was visible above that's why I updated it! And as now you can see that the image contains the things which is first shown to a new user that is *Welcome from the website* The image now has no problems. Thanks for you reply!Badassboy 63637 (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Beer for you![edit]

Congratulations!
Hello! Badassboy 63637. Congrats for becoming an Extended confirmed user in a few weeks. Let's party with this beer :) . A fellow wikipedian Siddartha897 (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the bear siddarth :) Badassboy 63637 (talk) 05:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ikall (company) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Ikall (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 18:35, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ikall (company) (June 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ikall (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Net worth of people[edit]

Hi. From my, and the previous editor's, edit summary on Mukesh Ambani, "Using Increase, Decrease or Steady is meaningless and possibly misleading, without any sense of timescale. We use it for companies because they have regular reporting periods." -- DaxServer (talk) 13:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok!Badassboy 63637 (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Information icon

Hello Badassboy 63637. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Intas Biopharmaceuticals, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Badassboy 63637. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Badassboy 63637|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. JavaHurricane 17:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is the second time i am getting this message, last time when I created this article BoAt and now this. I want to make it clear that i am a boy from India that too who is doing engineering. How will i have affiliation wuth a medical company. I told a user that my internet really sucks and i do short edits and publish them (Like one or two line) cause I don't want to loose what I have written. That's why you see a lot of edits of my edits at a single time. I have also added financials in Thyrocare, Lenskart, Nykaa and many more. This article about Intas Biopharmaceuticals was so badly written and presented so I thought of updating as a whole. So i added more information, financials and removed unwanted links. But now i saw that you have removed it. It's a request that please bring back to my edits because many of the things were written wrong in the article when I cross checked from google. I herby decalre that I am NOT a paid user and just a random user from wikipedia who love to edit articles. Thank you :) Badassboy 63637 (talk) 04:34, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PharmEasy moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, PharmEasy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It is written like an advert for the company, and it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Note that there was already a draft at Draft:PharmEasy, which was declined as non-notable a few months ago. bonadea contributions talk 11:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BoAt moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, BoAt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 01:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Godrej Anandam moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Godrej Anandam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 01:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boat company logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boat company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Pharmeasy.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Pharmeasy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mahindra xuv700 image front.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mahindra xuv700 image front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Godrej Anandam (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Force gurkha 2021.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Force gurkha 2021.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 17:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boltt company logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boltt company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BoAt[edit]

Information icon Hello, Badassboy 63637. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BoAt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Setting up page on fund contributing to Indian start ups?[edit]

Hey there,

I note that you have contributed to pages about larger hedge funds that back Indian starts ups. I recently tried to start a page about one but got rejected in the first instance. Any advise on how to approach getting a page/article accepted in this area?

Thanks in advance,

Caragh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caraghm (talkcontribs) 22:43, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vikas Oberoi[edit]

Information icon Hello, Badassboy 63637. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vikas Oberoi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:BoAt[edit]

Hello, Badassboy 63637. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BoAt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Godrej Anandam[edit]

Information icon Hello, Badassboy 63637. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Godrej Anandam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]