User talk:BabyKate1

May 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vavpča Vas pri Dobrniču have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vavpča Vas pri Dobrniču was changed by BabyKate1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931431 on 2021-05-16T03:18:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vavpča Vas pri Dobrniču, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. • | melecie | t 03:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Category:All stub articles, you may be blocked from editing. • | melecie | t 03:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to IP address have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: IP address was changed by BabyKate1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952775 on 2021-06-25T04:44:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Verifiability, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 04:48, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Cleared[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Cleared, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:48, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, you may be blocked from editing. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 04:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 04:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been Unblocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used for Postive Outcomes

If you think there are good reasons for being blocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BabyKate1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Am A Developer and his block me from a lot of thingsBabyKate1 (talk) 22:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple acccounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:08, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Johnuniq (talk) 04:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Rip Arelativelynormalperson(which is rare) (talk) 19:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update.md[edit]

You have been Unblocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used for Postive Outcomes

If you think there are good reasons for being Unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BabyKate1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Am A Developer and block me from a lot of thingsBabyKate1 (talk) 22:49, 26 June 2021 (EST)

Decline reason:

To repeat, the checuser tool indicates that you have abused multiple accounts. In your next unblock request, you should address this. PhilKnight (talk) 17:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Johnuniq (talk) 04:55, 25 June 2021 (EST) BabyKate1 (talk) 16:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]