User talk:BJBot/Archive 5

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AREMA Electronic Management of its Proceedings.pdf)

I am not sure why this image is considered orphaned, I created a link to it in the article. Also, the logo is in public domain and is free media, I must have tagged it incorrectly when uploading it.--Apelbaum (talk) 19:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

STOP

Do NOT touch my video game page or I freakin vandalize your page, dumbfuck. TehGuy (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC).

Image:BK Naughty Girl Riff.png

I have requested for a deletion. --Efe (talk) 05:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello

Hi! Why you deleted jd2005.jpg image thumb of my user's page?

--Andycld (talk) 23:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

User Page

Hello. You are removing an image from my user page on false pretenses. Fair use has been provided. please do not remove the image again. Zarbon (talk) 03:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Non-free images are not allowed on user pages. BJ^Talk 03:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Deltion of Justice003.jpg

The image Justice003.jpg was recently marked for deleltion, however it will be used for an article that I am currently editing as a subpage of my user page, User:McBeardy/Justice (newuniversal), to which it is currently linked. I will be moving the article tomorrow when I upload my final revisions, so I am removing the tag. McBeardy (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Making the band image

It was "orphaned" because it was incorrectly put on its article. I fixed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IHelpWhenICan (talk • contribs) 02:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Broken

I did not upload Image:TomKing.png, your bot is broken. Check the file history. -- Tim Starling (talk) 02:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Already fixed. BJ^Talk 03:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Giratina and the Sky Warrior.PNG

Well it's now used some had accidently took it out of its respecive page.--CoolPikachu! 07:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

hold on there!

you've flooded my talk page with notifications of "orphaned" images, when they link to other articles and are used in them... and it's not 3 or 4, it's more like 30 or 40! RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 13:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Blame the people mass edit warring. BJ^Talk 14:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

11/27/08

Hello BJBot, I tried to upload a book cover for Nana Upstairs & Nana Downstairs, but I discovered it is under a claim of fair use. What can I do to solve this? MHLU^talk 16:22, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Ph.D. - Three

Can you have Three (Ph.D. album) deleted for a month and a half? I wasn't really supposed to put it up yet. I know it's rare for someone to ask for an article to be deleted, but I can't take any chances. Thank you for understanding. Sposato (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

 Done BJ^Talk 20:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mauzan-Sublimes .jpg

Hey BJBot, please retain image as it's removal from Poster is being refuted, will also need time since i will be unavailable until middle of January, kindly, Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 14:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned Images

Hey, stop claiming that the images ive uploaded arent on any pages, when the image page itself specifies it's on a page Mascara"/"Leave Me Alone is the page, so please stop wasting my time by accusing things. Billy4kate,(talk)

Reply re: GMCW logo: I have added the tag, and as you will see, the logo is on the GMCW article. I am one of the chorus' Web administrators, which explains my access to and right to post the promotional, nonfree logo. It is nothing more than an identification. Please let me know if there's anything else you need from me, but as far as I can see, that should be it. Aharmon1973,(talk) 04:47 EST, 4 December 2008

Same again for me. I just got a host of warnings from your bot about orphaned images, when the images are clearly linked to articles. What gives?Konczewski (talk) 15:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Dane Cook Image

On my page a message was sent saying the image was orphaned. Why did someone remove the other image in the page, it was WAY better than the new one, quality wise and just plan old "ability to see whole body, so better reference". --SuperFlash101 (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

A Nobody^{My talk} is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--A Nobody^{My talk} 03:08, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

beautifultorneValley.jpg

I have talked to you about this picture before. It is my own work. It has also been used on our town's parks and recreation website [1]. You asked how I wanted it liscenced and I said I wanted to release it to the public with limited protection. Basically no one uses it claiming its another building. How do i do that? My article is The Joseph T. St. Lawrence Center and is not launched yet. Looking to get this picture up to launch. You might have responded to me before but when I had checked your page had been archived and I could not find my tread. ThanksSaintstaff (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Queen of Swords

I see you removed the image from my talk page. This was my practice before doing it on the article itself after being shown how to do it by my mentor. I see its gone from his page as well. I did read your reason but I find it easier to practice on my talk page than in the sand box.REVUpminster (talk) 09:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Company Business

I'm presently working on the article to go with the picture. I'll have it done in a couple of days. -Craverguy (talk) 06:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Transzap Image

Yes, please feel free to delete the Transzap .gif image. It is not being used in any articles. Thank you for the help!! Courtney L Brewer 15:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by CourtneyLBrewer (talk • contribs)

Bald-shadows.jpg

Bald-shadows.jpg, featuring artwork from the Dark Shadows newspaper comic strip, IS being used on the page for Ken Bald, the artist who drew the strip. As Bald is best known as the artist for newspaper comic strips (Dr. Kildare, Judd Saxon, and Dark Shadows), this image is used to show his photo-realistic illustration style. As no free alternative can be created, and since the image is a portion of a substatially larger work, this use can be considered "fair use." SirRastus (talk) 05:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice on Microsoft Popfly images

i think this is a bug as all images with internal link "Image:{filename}" has been moved to "File:{filename}", so obviously ALL fair use images will show orphaned as a result of the above BUG..

in fact in their smaller scales, 330px, 200px and 200px

are illustrations critical to the article presenting Microsoft Popfly,

but they were originally uploaded as Image:Microsoft Popfly Beta.png,

Image:Popfly Web.png and Image:Popfly Mashup.png, respectively,

AND the original links now shows orphaned per User:BJBot..

I have manually edited the Microsoft Popfly page to reflect the new image-link syntax for each instance mentioned above, to go around this bug, Thanks!

please be advised accordingly..

PS:There is also an explanation on the PopFly discussion page

--—-— .:Seth Nimbosa:. (talk • contribs) 07:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

It was the page blanking vandalism a few hours before that caused the problem. BJ^Talk 03:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

When_We_Were_Young_Cover.jpg

It is in use of an article. When We Were Young (Sneaky Sound System song), so get your facts right please before accusing me of something. Billy4kate,(talk)

Somebody changed the images on the article. BJ^Talk 00:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Warning!

You hacked my Wikipedia account! By removing all TV channel logos in my Wikipedia user page. I know it's a free logo used in the on air!!!! talk Thanks James.

Uh, what? BJ^Talk 00:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Forza Cover Art

This bot continues to edit my wikipedia userbox so that the Forza cover art image does not appear. Can the bot please stop editing the image. Thank You.--Jtsports92 (talk) 02:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

That's the intended purpose, you're not allowed to have that in a userbox. BJ^Talk

Is there a way i can get a forza related image into the userbox?--Jtsports92 (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Not likely, most art related to video games is non-free. BJ^Talk 04:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Would I be allowed to upload a photo--Jtsports92 (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

A photo you took would be fine, assuming it isn't a picture of the box art or the game being played. BJ^Talk 00:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Livefrommadisonsquare.jpg)

Hey, I think you didn't read the discussion of this file; I asked someone to delete this, because I tried to upload a new version and instead I upload a new file. That's why it's orphaned. Sorry, was my bad. Sparks Fly 16:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

It's a bot, I have yet to teach it to read. ;) BJ^Talk 23:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Your dumb bot

Tagged an image as an orphan in error - if your bot can't play nice, keep it on a leash.

Zotel - the Stub Maker (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

How profound, have something useful to add? BJ^Talk 23:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Error

The bot tagged File:TNA Wrestling.JPG as orphaned. For some reason the pic is not being shown as used, even though if you go to Total Nonstop Action Wrestling and check, you will see this image is used there. I'm sure it's not the bot's fault. TJ Spyke 05:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

It was this. BJ^Talk 07:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Unused fairuse tag issue

Hello. File:Brantford city 2000 logo.png has been tagged as unused fairuse despite being used on the Brantford, Ontario article. It's probably not the bot's fault because the image page doesn't list any linking pages. Maybe it has something to do with the Template:Infobox settlement and the change from Image: to File:? I don't know, but figured you're in a better position to look into it. ;-) Thanks. --NormanEinstein (talk) 14:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I tried the "null edit" trick mentioned at the top of this talk page and it seems to have done the trick. Thanks again. --NormanEinstein (talk) 14:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Émile Bernard 1888-06 - Brothel Scene, for Vincent.jpg

Thanks for notifying me. I have not yet decided on further uploads for this article, which at this time still shows a very much POV view on that artist's range of styles, but which imo cannot be properly explained without image documents. From the ~100 available non-free media on his oeuvre, I up to now only succeeded to "cut down" to ~25 (which was the main reason not to upload anything more, and not to have edited the article after the upload in question). Questions:

1. What quantity of non-free media would probably be accepted in such article, by the community? Thanks, Wolfgang [w.] 06:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
2. As a workaround, I just now created private sandbox User_talk:W./Bernard. Will this prevent your bot to perceive such file as "orphaned"? Such would help me to make up my mind for more than one week, on an article which is not easy to edit due to controverse opinions on Bernard. [w.] 08:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

   Anything created before 1923 is public domain in the US, so the fair use rules wouldn't apply. BJ^Talk 09:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

I suppose you're American, AND [for sure] you're wrong on this point, from a global point-of-view: Anything created in the USA before 1923 is PD, worldwide, and (maybe, I'm no lawyer) anything created wherever, before that date, might be PD according US law in the USA.

It would however not be allowed to keep above quoted material on COM, where (amongst others) EU law applies, which is much narrower on this, and says that a work is PD: After more than 70 years after the author's death, which is, according wikipedia/commons policiy, as far as I learned, January 1 in the year following author's death, i.e. for É. Bernard, 2012-01-01. I had to investigate this / to make up my mind, because major important (to one Van Gogh) Bernard painting "Pardon at Pont-Aven" had to be removed from COM, for being inacceptable, ~1 month ago (maybe, ~2 -- not really worth while to look up).

I therefore repeat my former question: Will your bot accept / "read" usage of files on private subpages as "used" in a project, or do I have to embed them in a mainspace article?

I BTW, a little while ago, saw B. Obama's complete inauguration speech on TV:
One more big step for mankind (last ~similar thing I remember was JFK, a while ago).
May God bless him, his family, ideas, and nation.
Wolfgang, from Vienna, Austria. [w.] 18:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

I see that private subpages are not accepted as "usage" by the bot. ACK. [w.] 13:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

On Bot's Removals

Beloved Bot, as thisone and similar ones are removed by you (no doubt, for good reason [in general] from subpages) I ask you whether there is a way to keep such u.n.t.o.u.c.h.e.d by YOU, the_BOT, for s.o.m.e. while, i.e. for becoming more clear on definite designs of articles(pages + sub-pages).

I, a human being, work on "v. Gogh" for a while, who interferes with a lot of artists, some of which are PD-Art, as of now, some are NOT. Is there a human way to deal with such? [w.] 19:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Screw You!

Screw You, I'll use whatever pic i want —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Real American (talk • contribs) 01:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

File:NZ one dollar obverse.png

I'm not commenting on it's deletion, but I find it funny how you sent me a message it was deleted when I was the one suggesting it! Might want to fix that bug. Laydan M (mailbox) 20:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Why?

Why Do You Feel Like You Should Destroy My Page What If I Did The Same.FireFinder (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

John McBain picture

You might want to consider deleting the picture uploaded by Onelifefreak2007, considering he's now on indefinite block. BassPlyr23 (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Userpage

Stop messing with mine, it's very annoying, samr with my talk page. Vileplume's Narcotics factory _{Wanna get high?} 03:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

You can't use that image on your user page. BJ^Talk 04:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lexlutsuperman.jpg)

Thanks for the heads up. I've readded it to Lex Luthor in other media. Xnacional (talk) 13:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Why is a wikipedia-screenshot non-free?

You removed the in-line display of File:Hiderevision_links.png at MediaWiki_talk:Common.css. The image has a {{wikipedia-screenshot}} licence, which is a GFDL licence. Why does this count as a non-free licence for the purposes of WP:NFCC? —AlanBarrett (talk) 08:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Look at the history of the image. BJ^Talk 14:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, I see that, at the time your bot removed the in-line display, the image had a different licence. Thanks. —AlanBarrett (talk) 15:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Reply to "Orphaned non-free media"

I understand completely that File:DDOlogo.jpg is orphaned. It was up for deletion, as it was obsolete (a newer version was uploaded).
Thank you very much for your time and understanding. —Kyuko (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Kyle1278

I saw that you had edited my user page but i do not see any significant change to it i am just wondering what you changed? Kyle1278 (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Buffy DVD image

feel free to delete File:Buffy DVD (Series).jpg. It's a duplicate of a file already on file. I uploaded it before I released it. Thanks.FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 08:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Delete

All the images on labeled as "orphaned" (as you posted on my talk page) I request to be deleted. I no longer need them so please delete them. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezekiel 7:19 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned image question?

The image Now 67.jpg has been marked for deleting as its orphaned.. but the image is clearly used here:

Now_That's_What_I_Call_Music!_67_(UK_series) ....

»—Mikay—talk—contribs→ 11:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Out of control

This is now the third time I've had to revert based on this bot. It keeps changing FREE IMAGE pictures to links when a FUR is not required. I realize when you wrote the bot, it checks on a few things, but merely having a FUR on a free image does NOT make it violate NFCC #9 for every other iteration of the image. Please reprogram/fix. — BQZip01 — ^talk 18:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Having a FUR does make the image appear to be non-free to bots. It should be removed from free images. BJ^Talk 18:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Suggest Change to Template Message

Hi, BJ! The bot leaves this as part of the standard message template on a talk page: "You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box." However, the dropdown list reference is now "File" rather than "Image." Time for an update, yes? Cheers, Geoff ^{T C} 02:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Somethingsample.ogg

Twice in the last couple weeks "BJBot" has tagged Somethingsample.ogg as an orphan. It's not an orphan; the file is used on the Something page. Is the bot malfunctioning? — John Cardinal (talk) 02:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Looks to be the page blank vandalism. BJ^Talk 02:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

File:0071378251.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Sorry inexperience. I am drafting the article and it is not yet up but should be up in the next few days. It might be better to delete and allow me to reupload since I failed to rename the file properly. --LittleHow (talk) 07:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience

It looks like an image I uploaded recently was removed from the relevant article by an IP address-based editor. Pretty sure this was a mistake, and this is why the image came up orphaned. In any case, I tried to be diligent about making the fair use rationale. If my rationale is incorrectly formatted, hope someone can let me know; I based it on other movie posters that seem to have remained in use at Wikipedia. Cheers, NMS Bill (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

The bot will remove the tag on the next run, or you can do it yourself. BJ^Talk 21:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, no rush. As long as the bot comes back around before the it should be fine. Cheers, NMS Bill (talk) 23:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:NovaM RADIO logo.png)

The image is no longer needed. Please submit for deletion.Kgrr (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Bot is working wrongly

It doesnt make difference to File and Image.. --Typ932 ^T·C 08:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

What? BJ^Talk 08:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

See Scuderia Ferrari article and images there ....it marked those logo pictures as orphan when they were marked as image I changed them to file --Typ932 ^T·C 11:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

This edit caused the problem. BJ^Talk 12:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay so the bot is bit too fast... ,) --Typ932 ^T·C 12:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for uploading File:EUF-logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification and all the explanation about orphaning, and I'm grateful for the suggestion I might put it back, but it was I who nominated it for deletion (as orphaned) after a more suitable image was found for the article. --RexxS (talk) 05:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Tagging previously tagged images

The bot is currently tagging some images that have already been tagged as having been replaced, such as File:GrandRapidsGriffins.png or File:HamiltonBulldogs.png. Just a heads-up. --fuzzy510 (talk) 05:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

How to delete image?

Hi, can you tell me how to delete the image i uploaded my self?Mfa fariz (talk) 11:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

File:MarjoryRazorblade.jpg orphan?

Although this image was recently relocated within Kevin Coyne, it is still used there lower down and is also still used in Marjory Razorblade. So how can it be an orphan? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

In the absence of any reply I changed the page link for the image and removed the tag. But then I saw the above note, so I shall revert my change of page link and null edit the original article as requested. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

And now it's been re-tagged as an orphan. Could you explain please? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 06:51, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Issue now resolved. Awaiting automatic deletion. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Alex Tronic Records

Hi BJbot, please can you put the cd cover images back on Alex Tronic Records page? They were deleted by mistake, they are not orphaned and are used in the article Alex Tronic Records. It's possible that the images didn't specify the article at time of uploading by mistake, please can you add it?

Thanks! Whodis7 (talk) 16:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Popular Image

Hi, yes the image was being used but, the article it was in is currently deleted, so i ll just upload it when the article comes back up User:Billy4kate (talk)

Sorry

I'm sorry for the image "Sao Paulo Futebol Clube logo.jpg". Next time, i will review the policy of FAIR USE.

Vitorbraziledit (talk), at 14:42, 12 November, 2008 (UTC-3) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC).

Request from Dico Calingal

I wish that the image File:The Star Network.jpg will deleted because I have many problems in making this image.PLEASE DELETE THE FILE I WISH.(talk) 4:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.15.166 (talk)

HELLO, THE REQUEST IS ERASING IMAGE, since a mistake in upload. It was THE PLANE TO THE FIRM UNITED AND NOT AMERICAN. RECOMENDED clears. THANK YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruuta 25 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: Orphaned non-free media (File:Geniol .jpg)

Hello, in reference to image: File:Geniol .jpg not being used, but, yes, it is being used in the Buenos Aires article and has not being removed, it is a cultural icon and is well placed, for some reason the file states that there is no pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file and that is incorrect, probably some sort of glitch, please clarify — Cheers, Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 13:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi

You tagged six of my images for deletion. It turns out that the pages were deleted as they were deemed not to be in compliance with WP:ALBUMS (sorry for not linking, typing in a hurry here). Thus, the images currently have no home and I assume you can simply delete them at this point. CycloneGU (talk) 21:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Crysis Extreme Edition Boxart.jpg)

Regarding to your warning, I would like to acknowledge you that already a better(& properly named) media File:Crysis Extreme Edition Boxart.jpg has been uploaded & there is no need of File:Crysis Extreme Edition Boxart.jpg, so its very good to get deleted. In fact If you may make me know how to make/get an uploaded file deleted by myself/moderator/making request/by other means, I would have been thankful. – Deb ‖ Poke • EditList ‖ —Preceding undated comment added 05:49, 24 May 2009 (UTC).

My file is orphaned becaused it the article its posted to is a redirect

JMacbonniehunt.jpg

is being contested. Please do not orphan until result is known.Jeneral28 (talk) 09:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Dico Calingal

I request for the deletion of File:Qualty Television Logo.jpg because of wrong name.Dico (talk) 04:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Whoa-Oh!FTSK Sel.png)

Um... it is obviouly that the image is being used on the page of Whoa Oh! (Me vs. Everyone)!! So it's not erphaned... Johnny0929 (talk)...5/28 2009 PM06:52 EST —Preceding undated comment added 22:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC).

Hit40UK

The image is not orphaned, as it is used on this article Hit40UK. So it should not be deleted as I have indicated every detail it needs. I uploaded the image ages ago and is perfectly fine. Jonny7003 (talk) 08:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Illegal.jpg

Is being promotional a good fair use rationale? Sought | Knock Knock | Who's There? 05:46, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

The Bash

Ok. You can delete it.

-AndSalX-WWECR (talk) 19:32, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

"Thank you"

Thank you BJBot, but that photo is now no longer needed for the Wikipedia, and is already up for deletion. Maybe this should be fixed in your software ISTHnR | Knock Knock | Who's There? 06:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Not Non-Free!

I've been reverting BJBot (talk · contribs) at User:Ellen541167 (see history)l it has been removing File:Ellen.svg repeatedly, despite it being a libre-licensed image. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 05:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

The image is in Category:All non-free media, the fairuse rational needs to be removed. BJ^Talk 05:21, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I understand now and have rectified the templature. Can the bot be programmed to recognize the licensing templates despite categorization? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 05:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Using categories is far safer and there is the bonus of fixing the images. BJ^Talk 05:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Re. Talk:Barack_Obama/Sandbox

To alleviate edit warring on the Barack Obama page, we've created a sandbox. We copy a section from Barack_Obama to the sandbox, edit it with discussion on the talk page, and then when we have a consensus, copy the new section back to the main article. When I copied to the sandbox a section that included an image, the bot removed the image because there was no fair use rationale for its use on the sandbox page, just for its use on the article page. It's also possible that a bot would remove it because it's not in the article main space. It would be a burden to our process to have to make temporary fair-use rationales for these temporary images. Can you tell me how to get Talk:Barack_Obaba/Sandbox added to the list of exception pages? Thanks. CouldOughta (talk) 15:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Changed Obaba to Obama. CouldOughta (talk) 03:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on my talk. BJ^Talk 04:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi There!

Just to let you know that I do not like it when people edit my user pages without my permission; so I will let you off this time, but do not let it happen again because next time I will not be so forgiving. User:Agent008

This is the second time now. Please do not edit my UP without my permission, thanks. User:Agent008

This is is you last warning BJBot, leave my user page alone otherwise I will see that you are blocked. User:Agent008

Okay no more chances from now on everytime you edit my user psge I will completely wipe yours until you learn to leave mine alone. User:Agent008

BJBot edited my user page and my discussion page! Now my image of Michael Jackson won't display as it should! When I'm done fixing the damage, I'll be sure to save the data on a Microsoft Word document, just in case it happens again. AND IT SHOULDN'T! Maildiver

I really must apoligze for my behaviour BJBot it was rude and wrong of me so I am very sorry, and I have manually removed the image. User:Agent008 —Preceding undated comment added 18:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC).

Hey!

Leave my UBX's alone, as they are not causing any issues and can be an exemption to WP:NFCC#9 --Urda (talk) 18:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Usersboxes are not exempt under NFCC. BJ^Talk 18:49, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Bot keeps removing images from my gallery

Hello, I saw the first time the "BJBot" removed some images from my gallery, so I went back to each image that was removed and then added a fair use rationale to each relevant image's licensing info page, so that all my pictures could be included in my gallery (of pictures that I've photographed and contributed to wikipedia over the years). I think this should be sufficient, given that the information is now listed on each relevant image's information page with a fair use rationale stating reasons for the image's inclusion in the gallery. But, I see today that the bot went through and removed those same nine images from the gallery again (even though they now have fair use rationales stating reasons for inclusion in the gallery). So, now what's the deal? I would like to get this matter resolved as reasonably as possible, so that the "BJBot" will leave my gallery alone, and so that I may know what to do in the future in order to try and prevent this type of thing from happening again. Leepaxton (talk) 20:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Non-free images are not allowed to be used outside the article space per policy. BJ^Talk 21:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

No offense, but to me, this all seems to be (at least) a little bit ridiculous. First of all, how do you even know that the two above statues are copyrighted? Are we just to assume that every statue that is visible in a public place is copyrighted? Therefore, nobody can use the images outside of ONE article that they are used in? What the heck?!! So, others can use these images all they want outside of Wikipedia as long as they provide a "Fair Use Rationale", but I can't use them in my own Wikipedia gallery of photographs that I myself have taken? I mean, come on, people snag these types of images all the time and use them with their licenses and then provide a fair use as to why they are using them someplace else, and that's all right, but I can't use these as representations of images that I myself have taken for use on Wikipedia? WHAATT?! Where do I complain about this further? Leepaxton (talk) 17:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

WT:NFCC if you'd like. BJ^Talk 17:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I will try to plead my case on the WT:NFC. Leepaxton (talk) 17:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

From User:Boyhere - unconstrucitve user page edit

The edit you done on my user page was unconstrucitve. It is now reverted. Please DO NOT edit the user page. —Preceding undated comment added 02:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC).

Please read the non-free content policy. You are not allowed to have non-free images on your user page. BJ^Talk 02:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Two images aren't orphans

The following images were falsley listed as orphans; File:OP-2102.jpg and File:OP-2227.jpg, both of which are in the article Grand Canyon Limited. I did try making a null edit to one of them, and it wasn't successful. ----DanTD (talk) 19:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

The null edit has to be made to the containing article. All fixed. BJ^Talk 22:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Ahh, I see. Thanks. ----DanTD (talk) 03:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

NEW

log in 47.22.158.194 (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

@47.22.158.194 47.22.158.194 (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)