User talk:Awmyth

Fair use rationale for Image:Minilogo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Minilogo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

The article CreateNewPage has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Rambhai-steaming-logo.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Rambhai-steaming-logo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

July 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to English Defence League, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Stop removing sourced info Jarkeld (talk) 12:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Just checking

Are you User:86.139.147.223? --Snowded ^TALK 13:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Still waiting for a reply--Snowded ^TALK 18:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I believe that is my IP. Awmyth (talk) 19:01, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. It would help if you would log in, or if you use the IP change the signature to your proper name - it prevents confusion --Snowded ^TALK 19:04, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I do log in. But it seems by the time I have finished writing and press Save, I have been logged out. Awmyth (talk) 12:29, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Well you may have a faulty internet connection, but if you take the "keep me logged in option" that should deal with that. If it does happen then take the first opportunity to go in and change the IP signature to your user name --Snowded ^TALK 12:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome notice

Hello, Awmyth, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowded TALK 18:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Advice

Your comment here broke two policies namely WP:AGF and WP:NPA. You are also arguing an opinion rather than arguing from reliable third party sources. I suggest you strike the comments about BW and apologise. Otherwise please read the material in the welcome notice above which also contains material that will help you understand how content matters are determined. It will also show you the various methods that are available if you are unhappy with the results of discussions on those page. I've done what I can to help you here, but to make it very clear, if you continue to attack contributions rather than focusing on content issues then I or another editor will request that some action is taken against you. This is a community, and by joining it you have to abide by its rules. Given that you are a declared member of EDL you have to exercise especial care to be neutral. --Snowded ^TALK 07:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I stand by what I have written. I have not accused anyone of anything, I have speculated on the possibility of a bias. Please read _meco's comment under yours. You talk of neutrality - that is a correct neutral response.
I refuse to withdraw or apologise. I know the rights of free expressions as well as its limitations. What I have written is well within my rights.
I have remained neutral. I have argued based on facts. It has been refuted based on a warped assessment of "reliability" of sources.
Yes I am an EDL member, I resent being called "far-right" for agreeing with beliefs which are shared by many members of the public.
If you have the authority to impose sanctions on me, please go ahead. I know my rights. I will fight for them the best I can.Awmyth (talk) 12:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia has rules and you have to follow them. If you don't then what will happen is a series of complaints followed by warnings and temporary blocks which will escalate. Please learn from the advise you have been given --Snowded ^TALK 12:41, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough. Please go ahead and complain.
I will learn from only those who I find are trustworthy. Sadly, from what you have written on the talk page so far, I do not have that trust in you to give me honest advice.
BTW, I presume you have the authority to write these threatening messages. Awmyth (talk) 12:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Indenting talk page posts

Please update yourself on the basics of WP:INDENT so that you don't make the discussion threads where you post disorderly. __meco (talk) 08:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

EDL

Hi Awmyth. Since you have identified yourself as a Hindu and a member of the EDL, I was wondering whether you had any comment or defence of your organisation to contribute to this section of the EDL talk page: Talk:English_Defence_League#Consensus_on_adding_a_reference_for_Dudley_protests.

Genuinely interested to hear your thoughts.

Cheers. --FormerIP (talk) 12:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion

I seriously think you should consider this option: WP:Mentor, you are falling over on your lack of understanding of process. Given the creativity of your various web sites the technical side will not be an issue. However you do need help on how to manage the process and interactions with other editors. --Snowded ^TALK 17:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

I am capable of recognising dishonesty, bigotry and bull shitting. I do not need mentoring.
If the mediation is refused, I will call an ArbCom against you. I will also ask for the deletion of the article.
Having come across your methods and attitude, I become even more convinced that Wikipedia has been hijacked by groups of editors to use for propaganda.
Remaining as an editor is not a priority for me. Threats of sanctions will not work on me. Please stop writing these messages, you are the last person here I will take advise from.Awmyth (talk) 17:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Just trying to help. FYI mediation requires all parties to consent so I'd start getting that ArbCom case together - I look forward to reading its reception --Snowded ^TALK 18:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

I have a nasty suspision that arbcom may be the end result, sad but ceelery.Slatersteven (talk) 18:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

And it will be thrown out as a content dispute. Arbcom only deal with behaviour and the only ones throwing the insults are .... --Snowded ^TALK 18:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Godd point. I hope its understood.Slatersteven (talk) 18:18, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

All the best

Hi Awmyth

I was sorry to hear about your family bereavement. I understand you need to pull out for the time being, but I hope you'll give serious consideration to resuming editing when you feel up to it. You can bring a new perspective to the EDL article, and help balance the views of unreconstructed leftists like me ;-)

Seriously, give it some thought when you feel up to it. The article needs more editors, not less, and I hope you'll come back.

All the best, TFOWR 18:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I've just come across this and would like to echo TFOWR'S words. I had a bereavement not so long ago and know it can take a little while to get over it. I'm sure you'll be back, but don't feel you have to rush it. Best. Jack 1314 (talk) 18:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Same here :) --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk) 13:59, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The Request for mediation concerning English Defence League, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 14:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
(This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.)

Proposed deletion of Rambhai

The article Rambhai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability cannot be achieved through non-independent sources. Only Times of India builds notability, all others are either dubious or non-independent of subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC)