User talk:Atanu das biswas

Welcome!

Hello, Atanu das biswas, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Atanu Das Biswas, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GILO A&E⇑ 13:24, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atanu Das Biswas[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Atanu Das Biswas, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GILO A&E⇑ 13:24, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 13:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atanu Das Biswas[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atanu Das Biswas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. S_peakF_ree ^(talk) 18:35, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atanu das biswas[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Atanu das biswas, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gurt Posh (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gurt Posh (talk) 18:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naadu das biswas[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Naadu das biswas, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gurt Posh (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Gurt Posh (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Indian Grand Prix. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pontificalibus (talk) 19:16, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Grand Prix[edit]

Thanks for adding that source to support your addition to the article. --Pontificalibus (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Legal threat[edit]

Regarding this edit, it is Wikipedia policy that any user who makes a legal threat should be blocked from editing until the threat is unequivocally withdrawn, or any legal action is settled. I will not block you myself, but I have reported your threat to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I will explain shortly below here why your articles about yourself were deleted. JohnCD (talk) 20:04, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. 5 albert square (talk) 20:07, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why your articles were deleted[edit]

I find it hard to believe that your articles about yourself, with statements like "Naadu married himself to the Bathroom Singing.They have two daughters Commode Singing and Wash Basin Singin", were serious but, making an effort to assume good faith, this is why they were not acceptable:

Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves, for reasons explained at Wikipedia:Autobiography, because of the conflict of interest involved. There are sites like Myspace and Facebook for people who want to do that, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.
The Wikipedia:Verifiability policy requires that: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source."
Article subjects need to have notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people unconnected with the subject thought it important and significant enough to write significant comment about? See also WP:Notability (people) and WP:MUSICBIO.

JohnCD (talk) 20:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atanu das biswas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I take back my threat of legal action against JohnCD has explained to my satisfaction why my articles were deleted and they were in accordance to the Wikipedia Policies (and then I realised I didn't have any legal case against him).Sorry for having troubled you. Atanu das biswas (talk) 09:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We appreciate the apology, but when you start with edits like this it's hard to see what value you will be to Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 13:01, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atanu das biswas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But i also edited the Indian GP and added a valuable Controversy which have been going on for months and nobody else entered it and I'm just starting in this Wikipedia.Sure u deserve a second chance but if you don't feel like that I will abide to any decisions that you take. Atanu das biswas (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

After reviewing your edits and deleted articles, I don't see that unblocking you would be a benefit to the project. You are welcome to show us what you intend to do if unblocked to convince us otherwise, but be sure that whatever you propose is in keeping with our policies and guidelines. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 15:36, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atanu das biswas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The articles on Biotech in Wikipedia are a bit of unprocessed, not in order and data is outdated.This is seen in many biotech articles like SIRNA, Role of antibodies in cancer therapatics etc.As I am currently studying these subjects I can easily rectify the mistakes.I can also help in articles on Indian GP as I am a selected volunteer. Atanu das biswas (talk) 16:48, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked due to abusive unblock requests. causa sui (talk) 22:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.