User talk:Ashwati Nair

Ashwati Nair, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Ashwati Nair! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ashwati Nair, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Ezhava have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Sitush (talk) 07:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kaniyar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2017

Mr.Sitush, according to you all the famous people in Kerala belong to Kaniyar community. Right? Ashwati Nair (talk) 02:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Sitush,"You", who doesn't know anything about Nair community are here to teach Nairs about the history of their caste. Wah! Shabbaash! Well, I have decided to publish a book. It will help the coming generations to know who they really are. And in that book, information about people like you will also be given. The coming generations should know that there were some people in Kerala who tried to destroy the Nair community. Ashwati Nair (talk) 02:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article moves[edit]

Please stop moving sourced articles and adding unsourced original research. Eg: at Velakkathala caste. - Sitush (talk) 12:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry Sitush. Real Nairs have their own marriage rules. The content in the Velakkithala page is not true that historically they were allowed to marry Nairs. it's a BIG LIE. If you don't believe me talk to the other real Nairs about Velakkithala caste. Also, Padamangalam and Tamil Padams are Tamils. They are not even Malayalis. Some women of these communities were Temple and Palace dancers. Because of this some men are abusing ancient Malayali Nair women. Ancient Malayali Nair women were very very religious and God-fearing. They never even learned dance. The women of Velakkathala caste were mid-wives. They are very similar to Nai caste. They are mistaken as Nairs. Because, names of these two communities, Nai and Nair, are very similar. Nairs don't marry from this caste. It's very painful to see untrue information about one's own community. Ashwati Nair (talk) 12:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the organization of Vilakkithala caste, Vilakkithala Nair Samajam. Real Nairs don't marry from this caste. Even ancient Nairs never married from this caste. The name of the organization of Nairs is Nair Seva Samajam/Nair Service Society. Ashwati Nair (talk) 13:05, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article moves: Warning[edit]

Hi Ashwati Nair. You need to stop moving pages that contained sourced information. Do note that Wikipedia relies on reliable sources for its information. If, as you state above, you believe something to be true, provide a reliable source. If you think there is incorrect, unsourced information on a page, you can go ahead and remove it. But do not move pages based only on what you think to be correct. If you continue to do so, you could be blocked. --regentspark (comment) 16:53, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when a move is contested, you can use WP:RM to initiate a move discussion. Make sure you use sources when explaining why you think the article should be moved. Since the moves are contested, I've moved them back to their original titles though you can request a move at any time.--regentspark (comment) 16:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for moving the pages. I will not do this again. I saw some disturbing comments about Nairs in some other websites. That made me to make changes in these pages. So that people can know more about the real Nair community. I'm very sorry. Ashwati Nair (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 10:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Nair Community (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 10:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff, You have called me "sockpuppet of Nair community". Shall I call you and Sitush Psychopaths? Both of you are behaving as if Nairs have no right to live in this world. By giving right information will anyone become sockpuppet? Tell me why you are not allowing to us to add the correct information? We are born in this community and we know about our community better than both of you. Being two educated people, don't feel shame to do all these? What wrong we Nairs did to you? Ashwati Nair (talk) 08:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashwati Nair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have given only correct information about my community. It feels like some Non-Nair users of Kerala have targeted the Nair community and are trying to completely change its history.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ashwati Nair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19877 was submitted on Nov 28, 2017 08:37:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was checking my emails and I accidentally clicked user token email again. I am very sorry. Ashwati Nair (talk) 02:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashwati Nair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want my account to be unblocked because I have added correct information about Nair community. I had made changes some Wikipedia pages but I when I was informed about it, I said sorry to the person who informed me. When I made a new archive in Nair talk page and added some information, at that time I was blocked by SpacemanSpiff. If I will be unblocked, I will not make changes in any of the Wikipedia pages and I will add new information to talk pages by referring books and websites.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Delete my account[edit]

{{db-Ashwati Nair}} I want to delete my Wikipedia account because some users who deal with articles of Kerala are not genuine. Ashwati Nair (talk) 13:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot delete your account (there is no provision in Wikipedia's underlying software that allows for account deletion). You may, if you wish, delete any messages on this page which do not relate to your current block, but the declined unblock requests may not be removed. This talkpage and your userpage will not be deleted. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{db-Ashwati Nair}} Can I deactivate my account? Ashwati Nair (talk) 13:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your account is already blocked indefinitely, so is practically deactivated. --Yamla (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can I deactivate like in Facebook? Ashwati Nair (talk) 16:13, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. Your account will remain available to you as long as you know the password. This page and its associated userpage will remain on Wikipedia, probably indefinitely. As long as the block remains in force, the declined unblock appeals above may not be removed, but other messages (including these ones) can be if you wish. There is no process by which you can delete or deactivate your account. Yunshui ^雲 _水 16:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yunshui, today when clicked the Kiriyathil Nair article. I saw a message in which it was written that "I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kavalam Narayana Panicker, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks." Yunshui, I have never edited the article Kavalam Narayana Panicker. It seems like someone has hacked the IP address which I use. Ashwati Nair (talk) 05:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(removed content) Talk page access revoked. We do not permit personal attacks here. --Yamla (talk) 13:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]