User talk:Artiumbremen

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Cohrs. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lelkesa 16:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

John Williams

Your deletion of header "Notable compositions" is unjustified by your argument "Serious compositions are not mentioned at all." This is not true, since his concerti and other concert works are prominently listed. —TashTish (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Artiumbremen! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Benjamin-Gunnar Cohrs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Nicola Samale - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Both entries refer to the official biographies of the conductors and the German wikipedia, for the one on Cohrs se also the International Who´s Who in Music. artiumbremen 23 Jan 2010

Letocart's completion

Dear Mr Cohrs,

I am not a musicologist or a composer, but a Bruckner's freak since my adolescence. I have found the CD with S. Letocart's completion on John F. Berky's site and, consequently, I thought that it was advisable to add a paragraph "Sébastien Letocart's completion (2008)". I think the current text is as neutral as possible.
About his sources Letocart writes: Le fac-simile des divers manuscrits, esquisses et bifolios du compositeur disponibles dans le "Finale Faksimile-Ausgabe" édité par la Musikwissenschaflicher Verlag Wien (MVW) sous la direction de Léopold Nowak ont servi de source principale à ce travail de complétion du Finale de la 9ème symphonie. D'autres documents, thèses et réalisations ont été consultés. Ils ont constitué une importante somme d'informations objectives ou au contraire nous paraissant parfois hautement contestables autant sur le plan des hypothèses avancées qu’au niveau de la réalisation musicale. Quoiqu'il en soit, ces autres sources ont permis d’enrichir ma critique et ma réflexion personnelle.

I am open for making further additions as long as there are sources to document them. Your suggestion for a paragraph "Further Finale Arrangements" is welcome. However it should cite published sources.

For two of these persons there is a page on wikipedia:

• For late Ernst Märzendorfer, as you write, his completion is no not published and thus unavailable.
• On page Marshall Fine is indicated that he is an author, journalist, and movie critic. Is he well the person you mention? As you write, this completion is also not published and thus unavailable.

For the two other persons (Hein s'Gravesande & Nors S. Josephson) I do not find any documentation on wikipedia. Perhaps you could provide me with sources on which there is some documentation on their completion.

Beste Grüße aus Belgien, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 12:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

PS: I can read German. You can thus, if you want, reply in German.

In the meantime I have created a section Further Finale completions, to wich I have added the links I have found for Nors S. Josephson's completion ([1] & [2]) and for Hein s'-Gravesande's score. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 16:02, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions. I have added these two references. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 13:37, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Nors S. Josephson's completion

FYI: Josephson's completion can now be freely dowloaded from abruckner.com.[3]
--Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 15:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Symphonisches Präludium

Dear Mister Cohrs,

I have read with interest your memorandum about the Symphonisches Präludium on John Berky's site.

On wikipedia page List of compositions by Anton Bruckner, alinea Attributed to Bruckner I have added the following text:

• On the contrary, the Symphoniches Präludium in C minor (1875-1876), which has been attributed to Gustav Mahler or to Rudolf Krzyzanowski, another Bruckner's student, is presumably by Bruckner. According to Cohrs it seems clear from the stylistic examination that the musical material of this ouverture-like symphonic movement is all Bruckner's, particular because some of the ideas even anticipate some music from the Ninth Symphony, which certainly nobody can have known already in 1876.

Do you agree with this content? --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 15:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

PS: I find it very regrettable that there is still a single recording of this work (N. Järvi by Chandos, 1992) - "Mahlerian" orchestration of the piano score by Albrecht Gürsching. This anachronistic orchestration is harming the work. As you are writing, "It is hard to understand why the beauty continues to sleep till this day." When will an acceptable recording be available, that is based on Krzyzanowski's copy, i.e., as you are writing, with "Bruckner's typical orchestra of double Woodwind, four Horns, two Trumpets, three Trombones, Bass-Tuba, Timpani, and Strings" ?

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Requiem (Mozart) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• assumes Mozart might have sketched himself, namely, the initial bars of all missing movements (Sanctus, 1–5; Benedictus, 1–20; Agnus Dei, 1–14.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:42, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Snood1205 (talk) 18:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.abruckner.com/editorsnote/news/aneweditionofthebr/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Snood1205 (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anton Bruckner Urtext Gesamtausgabe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.abruckner.com/editorsnote/news/aneweditionofthebr/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)