User talk:Arcade222
A note on NPOV[edit]
Have you read WP:NPOV? It says that the articles must provide a neutral summary of the independent reliable sources on the topic, the "neutral" part referring to the editor's summary of that source and not to the source itself or the resulting article. If you can't demonstrate that the article misrepresents the sources or fails to include relevant viewpoints, there is no NPOV violation. Schazjmd (talk) 19:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes? What "the article" are you referring to? The one about the fake "world parliament"? An article that at no point ever acknowledged that it was a fringe notion of no relevance and instead falsely stated that it was important for world peace? Arcade222 (talk) 05:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- I've removed those flourishes. It wasn't hard. Now the tag is unnecessary, and you can stop edit warring. Generalrelative (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wait why are you accusing me of "edit warring"? The only one who has been "edit warring" is the editor that has been removing the NPOV tag without discussion which is exactly what you are NOT supposed to be doing. Arcade222 (talk) 05:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm accusing you of edit warring because I can count (1234). Did you click the link to edit warring and see what it says? Generalrelative (talk) 05:39, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wait why are you accusing me of "edit warring"? The only one who has been "edit warring" is the editor that has been removing the NPOV tag without discussion which is exactly what you are NOT supposed to be doing. Arcade222 (talk) 05:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- I've removed those flourishes. It wasn't hard. Now the tag is unnecessary, and you can stop edit warring. Generalrelative (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Trede onions[edit]
negoteate or discuss with the.management the escuess weat the management the This whole section seems to be pushing a socialist/communist POV under the guise of "Social transformation". It starts strong with this this statement: "Most workers cooperatives have in their DNA the social transformation role." It even mentions Gramsci as if he was a household name the reader would recognize with the "Gramscian terms", and not some obscure communist of no relevance. This section should either be deleted or at the very least heavily rewritten. Arcade222 (talk) 18:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply Cooporative that effect the organization workers' represent individual members when they have a problem at work 112.198.66.233 (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)