User talk:Aradhyasharma

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Aradhyasharma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Battle of Sarsa, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Animalparty-- (talk) 22:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Sarsa[edit]

The article Battle of Sarsa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content and no references aside from Infobox.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty-- (talk) 22:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Zafarnama (letter) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Zafarnama (letter) was changed by Aradhyasharma (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925862 on 2015-02-10T17:24:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Squinge. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Zafarnama (letter) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The Wikipedia article should really be just a description of what the letter was, not a translation of the whole thing into English - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a repository of documents. Squinge (talk) 17:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Majad-ud-Daulah[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Majad-ud-Daulah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~HackedBotato ^{Chat with me ♽ Contribs} 17:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing[edit]

I would strongly suggest you refrain from changing/removing referenced information. Since I have now reverted an IP, whose edit closely resembles yours, consider this your only warning. The next removal/change of referenced information without consensus on the talk page will result in the notification of an admin and protection for articles in question. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning[edit]

I have posted a quote from the source concerning the Second Battle of Anandpur article. I would suggest you self revert your last unexplained change of the referenced information and take part in the discussion on the talk page. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Battle of Sirhind with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Second Battle of Anandpur with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Vandalism[edit]

Your vandalism on certain Mughal-Sikh conflicts demonstrates clear bias, which goes against Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Also it is blatantly false, as the sources make it clear that the Sikhs lost in those conflicts. Xtremedood (talk) 02:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Battle of Chamkaur. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Kharkiv07 ^Talk 02:03, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Battle of Chamkaur. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:34, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aradhyasharma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reason is Sir There are 10-20 sources for the authenticity of the battle of chamkaur.Mughals were not victorious see zafarnamah of guru Gobind Singh he himself wrote in the zafarnamah that I (Gobind Singh) had won a moral victory over the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb so i want you to add authentic information and remove false information. Consult 4-5 sources not only one there are many sources in which the result of the battle is not given only the written thing is Gobind Singh escaped unhurt so please add relevant information

Decline reason:

There are ways to dispute the contents of articles without just blanking the entire article. Bring up your ideas on changing the articles on their talk pages. only (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Battle of Sarsa moved to draftspace[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Battle of Sarsa, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 05:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]