Jump to content

User talk:Andrea Salimbeni

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please note there is nothing to stop you recreating the page provided that you abide by wikipedia guidelines.Deb (talk) 12:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EUBREN - The European Biomass Research Network is an indipendent non profit initiative, born in 2014, involving European universities and research centres with large experience on biomass sector.

In particular, EUBREN consists of a selection of universities and research centres in all 28 European member states. The initiative aims to promote and support European research activities on biomass sector.

Aims, initiatives and opportunities

"Researching for Bioeconomy". This is the slogan of the network. EUBREN members cooperate since the beginning of 2015 to strengthen the cooperation between academics and industries and develop new initiatives able to create international research programs focused on different technologies and market sectors, with the final target to bring academic results to a real industrial development.

EUBREN activities are distributed in seven technology platform, in order to cover all the aspects of European biobased Economy. Members are involved in technology platforms working group in relation on their skills, experience and interests.

  • Micro and Macro Algae
  • Thermochemical Conversion
  • Advanced transportation Biofuels
  • Biomass for heat and Power
  • Biomaterials and biochemicals
  • Agricultural Practices
  • Waste Valorization technologies

Activities and future perspectives

At present, EUBREN represents an experiment to create a community of European Researchers able to really share knowledge and improve the efficiency of the biomass research activity, avoiding competition and promoting fruitful cooperation. The experiment is running on its first year life, living thanks to the contribution of 23 founding members:

  1. * Aston University (UK)
  2. * University of Lisbon (PT)
  3. * Politechnical University of Timisoara (RO)
  4. * Lodz University of Technology (PL)
  5. * University of Vienna (AU)
  6. * Fraunhofer Institute of Technology (DE)
  7. * IVL-Sweden Environmental Research Institute (SE)
  8. * LEC - Lancaster Environment Centre (UK)
  9. * Centre for Research & Technology Hellas (GR)
  10. * Piraeus University (GR)
  11. * Corvinus University of Budapest (HU)
  12. * Budapest University of Natural Sciences (HU)
  13. * University fo Zagreb (CT)
  14. * University of Lille (FR)
  15. * University of Bari - CIRCC (IT)
  16. * Aalborg University (DK)
  17. * Umea University (SE)
  18. * University of Sevilla (ES)
  19. * Politechnical University of Valencia (ES)
  20. * Hasselt University (BE)
  21. * Wroclaw University (PL)
  22. * University of Oulu (FL)
  23. * Frederick University (CY)


External Links:

EUBREN Website EUBIA Website

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Non-dropframe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
--Non-Dropframe talk 13:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Andrea Salimbeni, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Non-Dropframe talk 13:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Non-dropframe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
--Non-Dropframe talk 14:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Andrea Salimbeni, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Non-Dropframe talk 14:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:European Biomass Research Network, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrea Salimbeni. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "European Biomass Research Network".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor Talk! 03:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]