User talk:Andonic/Archive 18

Please explain

[1] He did 4 twice in two separate 24 hour periods, how is this not a violation? He spent all weekend reverting me and being nasty so I'm curious how 2 separate violation in 2 24 hour periods isn't a violation. Would you mind explaining because I see it twice. I even see 5 violations in a single 24 hour period.KellyAna (talk) 02:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Bless you, bless you!! He has said horrid things to me, about me, and all that. I don't report for incivility cause we all get bitchy sometimes, but this was a clear policy violation and he did it all weekend. Thank you for the "time out" you gave him. KellyAna (talk) 02:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

!תודה

Thanks for the revert on my userspace! :) I must be doing a good job, eh? ;-) Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 04:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Haha, I would think Tuvok's character is more a parallel of Worf. Seems Data and The Doctor occupy similar roles, too. Character studies... :) Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 17:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Isn't Seven more akin to Deanna Troi? The way I see it, Kes was supposed to be Troi's VOY counterpart, but she didn't attract enough viewers and so was replaced by Seven. But Seven has qualities of both Troi and Data, so I see where you're coming from there. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 18:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not saying their personalities are similar, or that they fulfill the same functions within the Trek universe. I'm pointing out that the creators' purposes in including Troi and Seven (and Kes, too) were similar: Trying to attract viewers, if you know what I mean. :)

Troi lost her empathic powers in the appropriately named episode "The Loss", just to refresh your memory. ;-) Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 18:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem; I've been watching TNG lately as a break from VOY, so that episode is relatively fresh in my mind. I haven't seen any Orions, though; were they mostly a TOS thing? Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 19:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Sounds about right re the Orions. I guess the production team wanted to go with something a little more subtle. I'm going on hearsay about them, too; I've only read about them in three of Shatner's Trek novels. But yeah, I haven't seen Trek in any shape or form on regular television in a long time, and it's even becoming scarce on premium cable (the kind you get in hotels). Perhaps it's a Paramount/CBS/whoever-they-are-now conspiracy to starve Trek fans of their favorite shows so they'll flock to see Star Trek (film) when it's released? :P Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 19:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

lol! :P See you around the wiki. :) Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 19:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 6	4 February 2008	About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part IV	Tensions in journalistic use of Wikipedia explored
Best of WikiWorld: "Calvin and Hobbes"	News and notes: Milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Tutorial: Adding citations
Dispatches: New methods to find Featured Article candidates	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Roma people

Hi! I want to make some edits to the article, but it still seems to be protected. Would you please remove the protection. Thanks! --Olahus (talk) 10:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

removed cascading option

Hi there. I removed the cascading protection option from your user page, as it was interfering with the editing of templates that were transcluded on it (including WP:DEFCON). Cheers. --slakr^\ talk / 11:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Cloverfield edit

Cloverfield is not something you can cite for plot summary, and many details of the plot would need citation from no available sources. Not only was the plot summary bloated, but clarification is not possible at this time as details are intentionally left out. As such, I belive that a briefer summary that outlines the facts and basic plot serves an encyclopedia better.Zelphi (talk) 12:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Democratic Unionist Party edit

I cannot see why you have reverted my edits to Democratic Unionist Party. There were all quite legitimate, and brought the article up to date. By reverting, you have made a right hash of the article, and restored several inaccuracies. 217.41.240.15 (talk) 13:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Edits to God

I do not see spelling God as god as vandalism! I have not, I hope, changed any quotations. Mike0001 (talk) 13:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Brahma Kumaris

Hi. I gave a full explanation for my edit in the discussion page - take a look. It might be good if you wanted to make reverts that you discussed it too. It will help with making sure we all get along. Actually, I would appreciate your thoughts on my reasoning regarding the links - if you could reply on the article's discussion page, it would be most helpful as we are constantly trying to look for neutral editors to get more involved with it. Thanks for taking an interest. Appledell (talk) 09:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Storm Warning

I didn't vandalize anything, but you wikipedia lords seem to think every screws up everything. just make the damn changes yourself if you think we're all wrong. stop vandalizing you've been warned blah blah, you're real tough. vandalizing is not making something up and posting it. vandalizing i guess, is like plagerism on wikipedia. well that makes just about eveything on this site vandalization. this isn't a test and don't tell me to use the sandbox, i'm talking directly to you. you go around changing everyone's stuff and then people don't understand why and you never give a legit reason. let people post the truth for a change... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.24.37.105 (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Help needed with text removal

Hi. I need about 130k of text removed from the River Medway article. My gut feeling is that if I do it a bot will revert the change as apparent vandalism. Is there any way round this? Would an admin be able to do this? I have hidden the text from view but it is all still there. The reason it needs to be removed is because a new article has been created, as discussed on the talk page. Mjroots (talk) 13:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

There's another section still! open whole page to find it Mjroots (talk) 14:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For speedy reverting, banning, and getting there before me every time. Wexcan (talk) 14:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

You have done loads to earn that... Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page! StephenBuxton (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Typo

In the "My Opinion of Wikipedia" section on your userpage, I think you ment et cetera (etc.), just lettin' ya know. :) —T-borg (T | C) 20:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

One of the reasons he opposed you was for a typo on your user page? That's a new one. :) —T-borg (T | C) 22:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Question.

Hi, to, its me TratostheFeared. I just wanted to ask you why you told me i was "vandalizing" those 2 pages. I mean, its not that im trying to pick a fight with you or anything, i just wanted to know what i did wrong, so i wont do it again. please respond ASAP. thx^^ ^^(Signature)^^ 23:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tratosthefeared (talk • contribs)

Hey to its me Tratos again. thx for clearing that up, you know. I really was just utterly perplexed about the whole vandalism thing, and seeing as i am new to the wiki, it is great to have someone tell me whats what, rather than find out the hard way. thx, c ya. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tratosthefeared (talk • contribs) 00:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, its Tratosthefeared again. I had a little question about opening external links on pages that you are editing. I dont know how to even open a link, and every age that i edit says that i opened a bad external link.

Question.

why did you delete the Top 50 at a Glance Page?! 76.185.36.142 (talk) 02:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Graham

RE: Email

You've got mail! ;) Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 02:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Is it a fly? Is it a plane? Is it a barnstar? Yes it is...

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Cheers for helping out earlier today with RFP, was a great deal easier with you around :) Rudget. 17:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Protection of Rough Collie

Hello AndonicO,

Could you please revert to the correct, undisputed version? See diff here and Talk:Rough Collie#Edit protect request for details. In particular, the references no longer display due to syntax error. Thx, JGHowes ^talk - 17:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Excuse Me

please dont warn me because im the owner and i did create my there 2 wikipedia page so please dont warn me.

i have to rite to remove the tag in here. because i did start the 2 wikipedia page you tag is looking bad on my 2 wikipedia page please dont do that from josh710

Damm you're fast :p

You updated DYK before I could find an admin to harass about it. :) Thanks! Agne^Cheese/^Wine 01:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks AdonicO : ) Julia Rossi (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

29 Years?

Wow, are you sure that he'll learn the lesson until then? :D -- lucasbfr ^talk 02:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Woo-hoo!

Man, it's been a LONG time since I've had a DYK! Last time was under my old username...and I can't even remember what it was! Thanks for the consideration! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

• Yeah, buddy! I'll take it! Thanks again. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Warning on User talk:216.26.217.244 in error

I think the last warning you gave to User talk:216.26.217.244 is an error. He seems to be correct on the 7th goal by Andrea Pirlo. I don't think it should be reverted and warned. What I warned him about previously, is for putting a bogus pp-semiprot tag in the Pirlo article. He explained he thought it would protect the article itself. I have to assume WP:AGF now and take him at his word. I explained how to go about requesting protection. Please review the case. Thanks. -- Alexf⁴² 02:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for checking it. -- Alexf⁴² 03:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Commons images on the main page

Hello! When placing a Commons image on the main page, please remember to first upload it to the English Wikipedia and tag it with the {{c-uploaded}} template. Otherwise, it will not be protected, so a vandal can replace it at the Commons and change what appears on our main page. (This occurred with Image:MolyneuxCelestialGlobe-MiddleTemple-1889.jpg, which was replaced with a photograph of a human vagina.) Thanks! —David Levy 08:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for the recommended pages you forwarded me. They should be resoureful to a new Wikipedian like me. 68DANNY2 (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Ashley Tisdale Photo

Thank you for giving me the benefit of the doubt for that photo. I had NO intentions whatsoever to vandalize the page. She's like one of my favorite actress! 68DANNY2 (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Your block of 82.6.96.66

Hi. Could you please comment on the unblock request by 82.6.96.66 (talk · contribs)? It appears to me that this user has been editing productively and that his edits were mistaken for vandalism. Sandstein (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

thanks for unblocking me.. i guess anons get a pretty hard time here at wikipedia, don't they. 82.6.96.66 (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Japanese Instrument of Surrender edits

When reverting the most recent vandalism on Japanese Instrument of Surrender, I notice that all the IP address came from Denver, CO all under the same ISP provider, is there a way to head of what I'm guessing will be the vandal's next IP? Also since I'm here, would you mind taking a look at my article on the Basilica of Sts. Peter and Paul and tell me what you think? Thank You--Pewwer42  Talk  20:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thankyoumuch, and do you think it would befit from going through a peer review?--Pewwer42  Talk  23:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

To make it simple, the congregation grew to large for the building they were in and the Diocese of Portland made more churches in that area splitting the people up. Hope that helps. What do you think it would take to get the article to good article status(or is it even possible on such a subject?)--Pewwer42  Talk  01:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Well gee, I don't know what to say, I guess I'd like to thank my mom and dad for always getting me to church on time. And my teachers for making me see a reason why I should always check what they said. and my friends who don't even know about this. and to my dog who didn't bark once the whole time I was writing. and to gateway for making a computer that didn't crash at the wrong moment. and to Microsoft, for making me seem to be the only person who windows doesn't crash on. and to vandals who made me care about the content of this wiki. and to those French Canadians who built that church. and to God who made the French Canadians build that church and to andonicO who gave me that barnstar. and to SMUD for provideing electricity. and to some cave guy, for makeing the wheel. and to..............(did you really want me to go on?)--Pewwer42  Talk  01:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

shhhhhh, quite, I told my computer it was a myth. It has nightmares of some massive fire consuming the building and of me laughing and buying an faster computer with the insurance money (and yet it's not insured) don't be insensitive:P--Pewwer42  Talk  01:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Now now, you shouldn't assume about things. My computer is young and still has much to learn. Every day I read to it from this great site called wikipedia and every night it gets a new story on how the mighty warrior Pewwer42 and his band of oddly named friends fought the vile vandalism to save the day once again. Its a learning process.--Pewwer42  Talk  02:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

well a computer can't help if it has autism can it. It just has to be cared for and made to feel accepted.--Pewwer42  Talk  03:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

ages ago

By the way, just noticed you helped me as a newcomer. That was ages ago, heh. · AndonicO Hail! 18:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Heh, so it is. Back in the day with my old name. Well, it's nice to see how far we've each gotten since then, eh? - Revolving Bugbear 20:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Jameel Sewell

I am NOT vandalizing the Jameel Sewell page, I've read in the "Roanoke Times" newspaper that in fact Riko Smalls has been named the new starting Quarter-Back for the Virginia Cavaliers, stop harassing me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superwhitekid (talk • contribs) 01:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

If you are refering to this http://www.roanoke.com/sports/breaking/wb/149121 article in the Roanoke Times, if you read it, it does not say that Riko Smalls is the starting quarterback. It only says that UVA signed him. Please do not change the information on the page again until you get an official press briefing from the Cavaliers, NBC29 (who could get that information before anyone else) or coach Grohl. Boydannie (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

For the reversion on my talkpage. Cheers, --Nuttycoconut (talk) 03:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Morton Downey, Jr.

Hey, Einstein. Downey couldn't have been born in BOTH 1932 and 1933, as the article suggests. Please think before falsely accusing me of vandalism. 71.202.242.152 (talk) 10:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. 71.202.242.152 (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

User_talk:Ihateoperas

29 years? Where did that figure come from...! :-) _GB^T/C 12:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Unless they decide to grow old disgracefully... _GB^T/C 12:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 February 9

Hi, your format-fixing deleted my answers on the aforementioned page completely. Fred Plotz (talk) 13:08, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Regards Fred Plotz (talk) 13:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks

.: RFA thanks :.

Thanks for supporting me! My RfA passed with a final tally of 5 neutrals, 1 oppose and 148 supports, a turnout I couldn't have dreamed of. I'm going to do everything I can to help out the community, help with sysop tasks, and of course, contribute to the encyclopedia. If you ever need a hand with something, feel free to give a shout! Cheers! Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 17:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Heel (professional wrestling)

Saw dude's "edit" to Heel (professional wrestling); I don't agree with his edit, but is it really fair to call it vandalism? fhb3 (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXI - February 2008

The February 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --10:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Sorry, but what was that? Shobhit102 (talk) 17:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Current UK TOCs

Why is this vandalism. I was adding information to the template as well as jigging some of the numbers. I have done edits like this many times. Why is it level 2 vandalism? I am going to revert! Btline (talk) 18:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

4 G Fighter

Do you not think it wise to read the discussion, check the comments and look at the archive before deleting here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.113.247 (talk) 18:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Death Sentence

If you think that this was vandalism, you need to take off the rose-colored glasses. Waht I did was change a word-for-word account of the movie to a digestible summary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_Sentence_(film)?diff=190670415

Maybe you should actually read those boxes that say "This Summary is longer than the entire article" before you cry Vandalism on someone who made it easier to read. thanks.

Question

How is this edit vandalism? And how is restoring a re-direct that has already been discussed by several regular members of Queen related pages vandalism? If you review the history I simply restored what was already there. And the Robert Plant edit had a very very vlear edit summary. Perhaps you should review. 156.34.213.161 (talk) 02:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

AndonicO, I think the was right. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 02:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the support. In case you were wondering about the re-direct... it's covered here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Queen/Songs. Only "singles" are deemed notable enough for articles. All non-singles had their content merged back into their parent album articles. Hope that helps. Also... I am looking at several of my Robert Plant CDs as I type... they are all released on Es Paranza. Have a nice day. 156.34.215.201 (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to readd the edits, I'm very sorry for the mistake... · AndonicO ^Hail! 03:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

what do you think

I thought up (and made) a funny photo for vandal patrol the anonymous body with the wikipedia symbol as the head and the text

We do not forgive, we do not forget

Beware vandals, you are on our watchlist

well?--Pewwer42  Talk  04:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't know, seems a little light on the armor side for a knight. I'll upload mine soon and hopefully anonymous won't have an issue with it.--Pewwer42  Talk  03:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

There, it is now on my user page take a look--Pewwer42  Talk  04:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I thought Roman Legionnaire's had shields? just wondering--Pewwer42  Talk  10:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

It's amazing how much you forget when you don't think about a subject for a while. I think I actually did a report on them once. to much calculus, must be invading my brain $\int _{0}^{\pi }f(x)-d(x)\,dx$

$f(x)=5x^{3}\,$

$g(x)={\frac {7x}{2}}$

--Pewwer42  Talk  21:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The only hard part for me was makeing it show up correctly--Pewwer42  Talk  21:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

No not really, I just have this nifty thing called a calculator--Pewwer42  Talk  21:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I would if I had a TI-89, but I don't :'(--Pewwer42  Talk  21:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

sorry

I'm sorry. 208.108.156.57 (talk) 13:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Rhymefest

Hello,

I have to strongly, but respectfully disagree with you. The original video links no longer exist. The new ones are the main if not the only other sources on the web.

The Michael Jackson mixtape link was a deadarticle, I actually linked it to the official site of its origin. There is no better source.

The re-wording and additional credit of the director of the videos are completely relevent because of the of the body of Rhymefests work he is responsible for.

Rhymefest's myspace is an active site in which he posts new blogs weekly and communicates with fans. It is more than relevant and updated daily in comparison to his official site which hasent changed in two years.

I have to insist that the changes remain. No offence to you personally.

Thanks

24.15.22.244 (talk) 16:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for tagging 163.153.12.121. The district has reported that the students involved have been identified and appropriate steps are being taken. --NERIC-Security (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for adding the account to role accounts. However, based upon the discussion on the Administrators' noticeboard, back around 17-Jan (I can't find it in the archives), the consensus seemed to be that folks were not comfortable with this being a role account, so I agreed that others here will not use it. I guess that this makes it a single purpose account that I've kept separate from my personal account. I'm fine with it this way as long as everyone realized that I'm not a sock, since my personal interests do overlap with work. --NERIC-Security (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

29 Years?

Do you think this block[2] might just be a tad out of line with similar offenders? -- Zsero (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I've got no problem with blocking a non-IP vandal, if only to catch his attention. What I boggled at was the term of the block! I've never seen a 29-year block before, for anything. -- Zsero (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Confused

I have replied to your post on my talk page. Would you mind revisiting? Thanks, — Dulcem (talk) 02:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: email

Uh oh. Wish I still had rollback. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 00:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)