User talk:Alice d25

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Alice d25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Valenciano (talk) 09:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nouvelle Vague Allemande[edit]

Hi, you'll need to at least translate some of that article otherwise it will be deleted as having no content. Valenciano (talk) 09:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

....and the same for Berlin School (films) Valenciano (talk) 09:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

he valenciano, thanks for the advise. but my english is not so good that i could translate the german wikipedia site of berliner schule. I hope someone else is interested to do that. --Alice d25 (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

maybe my english was good enough - i can't see any changes at the article (except small ones) - impressive!--Alice d25 (talk) 03:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was a good job, much better than my Deutsch! If you add any more and want someone to have a look over them for translations etc then leave a message on my talkpage. Valenciano (talk) 08:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nouvelle Vague Allemande[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nouvelle Vague Allemande requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --IShadowed 09:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Berlin School (films)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Berlin School (films) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --IShadowed 09:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Edit warring at the Lina Medina article[edit]

WP:Edit warring is not a smart route to follow in this case. As noted here and here, Wikipedia has policies that you should follow. WP:Not censored is one of them. Your sensitivities do not override that policy. Unless you can provide a valid rationale at Talk:Lina Medina for why the image should be removed, the image in question will remain; this is whether I need to ask WP:Med to weigh in on the matter or take you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (WP:ANI) about it. As previous discussion at Talk:Lina Medina shows, attempts to keep the image removed have failed. Your WP:I don't like it rationale doesn't have much of a chance at succeeding in this case. And if you continue editing WP:Disruptively on this matter, you will likely be WP:Blocked. Flyer22 (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you are misunderstanding me. my argument is: do you have a permission by the pictured person to use this photo? obviously not! that means, wikipedia or you is/are using this photo without permission. that's a totally rational reason to delete it.--Alice d25 (talk) 12:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You do not know what you are talking about in this case, and that's because you are not familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. For example, its policy on images; see Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Images. For the vast majority of pictures of living and dead people on Wikipedia, no permission was given by those people or their relatives for use of those images on Wikipedia. You think Scarlett Johansson gave permission for all the images used in her Wikipedia article to be used there? You would be incorrect to assume so. I think that it's easy to see why you are reverting in this case; it's for the same insufficient reason that others have removed the image. With your first removal of the image, you called the image "degrading." In my opinion, the image is not degrading, but is rather the only visual proof of a matter that many people find even more difficult to believe without an image showing it. You reverted again, after the warning I gave you above. Your post at the article talk page does not justify removal of the image. I will respond to your comment on the article talk page with the same commentary I made in this paragraph. I will then alert WP:Med to this matter and Wikipedia talk:Non-free content, which is more active than Wikipedia talk:Image use policy. And if the WP:Consensus there on the article talk page is to restore the image, it will be restored. Or, because your removal of the image is not based on a Wikipedia policy or guideline, someone might revert you on the matter in the absence of a clear WP:Consensus. Flyer22 (talk) 03:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Image use policy: "Even in countries that have no law of privacy, there is a moral obligation on us not to upload photographs which infringe the subject's reasonable expectation of privacy." - there's nothing more for me to explain. or do I still have to explain "privacy"? and that people in Peru in 1939 usually didn't go out naked?--Alice d25 (talk) 14:44, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need for us to keep responding in two different places. The article talk page is what further discussion on this matter is for. Just like you feel that there is nothing more for you to explain, I feel that there is nothing more for me to explain. I await other opinions there. Flyer22 (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Alice d25. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Alice d25. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Alice d25. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Alice d25. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]