User talk:Ahecht/Archive 1

Hello Ahecht! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Ageo020 00:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC) --Ageo020 00:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Copyviolation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Green Bushes, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from [1], and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Green Bushes and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Green Bushes with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Green Bushes.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Green Bushes/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Green Bushes saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! -WarthogDemon 22:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of White to Play

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is White to Play. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White to Play. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Trapper_John_McIntyre.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Trapper_John_McIntyre.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — Fourthords ^{| =/\=} | 04:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trapper John McIntyre.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trapper John McIntyre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trapper John McIntyre.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trapper John McIntyre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

References

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:45, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

"Don't add dates to the "release date unknown" section. If you can find a reliable source for the release date, cite it and move that item to the appropriate section of the article. Thanks. Ahecht (talk) 23:23, 25 June 2013 (UTC)" The edits I added come directly from the albums' own wikipedia page. Should I cite another wikipedia page on wikipedia? I didn't add them to the appropriate section of the article because I can't figure out how to edit the table without turning it into a big mess. If you know how to do it and would like to walk me through it, I'd appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.83.232.185 (talk)

The edit I did on the Nevermind page, where I said it's one of the greatest rock albums of all time, I don't need a source because it says that in the article. Rolling Stone listed it as #17 as one of the 200 best albums of all time list. That specific source is already in the article, so I don't think it is needed. 108.49.138.50 (talk) 13:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

I've readded the information to the article, but I reworded it is such a way as to avoid peacocking and weasel words. Thanks! --Ahecht (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Ahecht and thank you for your kind note. It appears that there are some misunderstandings at play here. I was apparently going about attempting to correct some incorrect / broken links in the wrong fashion. The instructions were a bit unclear and I was unaware of the 'sandbox'. If you could please help me do this the correct way, I'd be very grateful. I am very new to using the system and am only concerned with making sure that these broken and incorrect links are fixed. It's in everyone's best interest to provide correct information. Thank you for your understanding and assistance. Apologies for my newbie errors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudiasnell-nichols (talk • contribs) 19:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Okay Im deeply sorry for my stupid vandalism.. I apologize ! I wont do harm anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.115.192.212 (talk) 18:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Tomorrowlandentrance Cd637 (crop).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tomorrowlandentrance Cd637 (crop).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Valwood School

Hi Ahecht, I appreciate your cleanups of Valwood School but I take issue with its characterization as a 'former segregation academy'. It still is though there are black students attending. By definition a Segregation Academy is a school established to avoid integration which Valwood is. It is still predominantly white and academics is a thin veil to over the real reason people send their kids there.

Also I think it is important to note in its history that it was only open to white students initially. This is a historical fact and must be included for completeness and to understand the nature of this type of school. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.69.27.16 (talk) 11:39, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Ahecht

I am searching for a table that lists every single 98884 unicode.

Wikipedia lists this site as displaying them for FREE via the following text:

decodeunicode.org Unicode-Wiki with all 98,884 graphical Unicode 5.0 characters as GIF images in three sizes. Including full text search. English/German

This site has since been changed and what it says is there - is no longer there.

http://www.decodeunicode.org/

http://www.typografie.de/Our-Books/Typography/Johannes-Bergerhausen_Siri-Poarangan/Decodeunicode::1409.html

This is now a PAY website where they are selling a book requiring purchase listing the unicodes. I am still searching for a public-domain list Online of all the 98884 unicodes and I think the link HERE:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_symbols

Should not include their URL until it is a true statement. They need to either state they no longer have it, remove their link from Wikipedia as there is no room for false advertising, or make it a true statement by returning the full unicode listing.

Sincerely, David W (dw817) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.166.185 (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

I assume you forgot to sign in. I responded on the dw817 talk page --Ahecht (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

-i was being neutral, with all the re writes,,world war z the movie barely qualifies as the source material, it shares not but the title and he general theme. 99.252.35.222 (talk) 01:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chess Titans

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chess Titans. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 01:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Mahjong

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Mahjong. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 01:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purble Place

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purble Place. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 01:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Visual Editor

I don't think the badly formatted references at Kurt Busch were necessarily the result of VE mucking with things - that IP has, several times on several articles, attempted to add references using that odd format, even before VE was rolled out. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I've seen a lot of similar attempts by other IP users to add references that way since the VE was rolled out so I assumed it was the cause, but I guess it goes back farther than that. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey Guy

PLEASE fix the article List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network (Latin America) as it was before and apply semiprotect for 2 months in this article.--OliverDF (talk) 01:57, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

First, the removed information had no sources. Wikipedia has a policy on unsourced information at WP:UNSOURCED. A warning message was placed on that article in August 2012, almost a year ago, an in that time no sources were provided for shows other than the ones in the current shorter version of the article. Per the policy of WP:UNSOURCED, the responsibility for providing reliable sources is with whoever adds or restores the material, so without a reliable source I cannot add any of the old information back in. Second, note that I am not an administrator, so I cannot semi-protect the article. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

.

NP, you do what you feel is necessary. Considering Unicodes do not show up in a large number of browsers, I no longer feel the need to support the site that lists them.

I have moved back to working on my novels again. Take care ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.166.185 (talk) 00:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for Green Bushes

I just now came across an article you started back in 2007, Green Bushes, on the folk song, and I wanted to thank you for writing it up. I was adding an entry for the song at MusicBrainz, and was happy to see a nice WP article I could link to it (and have the text automatically included, due to the free content license). Thanks for your work. JesseW, the juggling janitor 20:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of cruise ships with similar names (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sky Princess, Freedom of the Seas, Island Princess and Pacific Pearl

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Royal Caribbean International may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 3=2}} || 2004 || 90,090<ref name=fleetguidePDF /> || 2,112<ref name=fleetguidePDF /> || South [[Caribbean], [[Alaska]] || [[San Juan, Puerto Rico]] & [[Seattle, WA]] || [[File:Jewel of the Seas
• link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref><ref>[http://www.presstur.com/site/news.asp?news=36059 ><Monarch amplia frota da Pullmantur em 2013><PressTur><<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.cruiseindustrynews.com/cruise-news/6986-royal-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of cruise ships with similar names may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• **{{MS|Thomson Celebration|3=2}}, 1984 (Named in 2005, [[Thomson Cruises]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of notable alumni of the Colonel Brown Cambridge School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akram Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

avg wage page

I need your help. On the avg wage page, they are insisting on using numbers from a BBC article which quotes figures from ILO. Here are some facts and issues. The BBC article is a few years old, and the ILO data no longer exists on the ILO website, raising a presumption that it has been deleted and retracted. In addition, for most countries listed, we already have TWO other sources which actually match eachother quote nicely, just that one is monthly and the other annual. The ILO data for some countries directly contradicts the two other sources, and in fact when I did a simple calculation on the talk page using the same meth of the ILO, the figures were radically different, but similar to the other two sources. This lends further credence as to why ILO deleted the figures. What is the policy for a page quoting numbers which has later been deleted by that source, and for which there is redundancy in that list to begin with? I have proposed not using the ILO list due to these issues, or perhaps using it for countries not mentioned in other two lists. What do you think? Lneal001 (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The BBC article stated that the ILO usually doesn't go public with their information. The fact that it's not on the ILO website doesn't mean anything (see WP:OFFLINE). Without a reliable source stating that the ILO has retracted the information, drawing such a conclusion from the data not being on their website is original research. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Of you read the article, it says "publically available until now." So where is it? Actually, the ILO has publically available statistics on its database called Laborsta. They even have a section called Earnings. So the BBC article is simply wrong on that, as the ILO have a whole website dedicated to such stats. If the data were in existence today it would almost certainly be there. In any case, we are not running into redundancy. We already have two lists showing all developed and some developing countries, which are all very transparent and where one can access it to the source. Both sources match eachother almost perfectly. The ILO data seems to be understating wages by a significant degree for some countries like the US. The US is more than $1300 per month understated vs the other two sources. Their methodology says they divided the total wage bill by earners. That's exactly what the two other sources did and the figure is well above. Other countries are way off as well. Again, I am applying the methodology mentioned in the BBC article, which the other two sources also used. It should be deleted, or limited to countries not mentioned in OECD/UNECE. Lneal001 (talk) 17:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Noah (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Royal Caribbean International may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• as the ''Radiance''-class {{MS|Brilliance of the Seas|3=2}}. {{MS|Mariner of the Seas|3=2}} and {{MS|Serenade of the Seas|3=2}, another pair of ''Voyager'' and ''Radiance''-class ships, were

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

sources added for Toon Disney

I've added a ton of sources for those Toon Disney premieres. This should improve notability quite a bit. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Make sure you post this to the AfD discussion as well. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

St Johns F.C

If you delete the page then I will never listen to you again. Please don't do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dillon Tettey (talk • contribs) 21:00, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

About the nomination of Al Rajhi Soft for deletion

Reference links was deleted and edit to include other sites talking about the company and other issues in the article and it was not my intention to remove a speedy deletion tag from Al Rajhi Soft, it happened while the editing of the page --MaherBaker (talk) 01:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 01:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Derrick Byfuglien

Hello, and thanks for notifying me about the proposed deletion of the Derrick Byfuglien page. It is true that he played most of his career in the ECHL, which isn't exactly a high-profile league. However, he was drafted by an NHL team: the Ottawa Senators. Wouldn't this satisfy the notability criteria? Thanks! NHCLS (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

NHCLS, per WP:NHOCKEY being drafted in the NHL only makes a player notable if they were drafted in the first round. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

True, even if I disagree with the criteria. How about him being a finalist for the Minnesota Mr. Hockey award? Thanks! NHCLS (talk) 15:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

If he won an award, and the award were considered a preeminent honor of a lower minor league, a major junior league, or a major collegiate hockey league that would make him notable, but being nominated for a high-school award does not him him notable. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Astlër-Burnet Economic Problem

I think the page you proposed for deletion should have been proposed for speedy deletion. Article does not have reliable sources and possibly, it may contain original research too. I didn't find any source that back up the article. A.Minkowiski (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

A.Minkowiski, I wasn't sure that it was blatant enough for CSD and tend to err on the side of caution, but I'd have no objection to you proposing it if you feel it blatant. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Before tagging it for SD, let us see how author improve the page. If page remain in the same position for stamped time, then I would suggest it for SD. A.Minkowiski (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Obetim Uno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asaba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Disney Channel Germany

Hello, Ahecht

I live in Germany and my English is not very good for final culprit I me. Due to the removal of the "banner" I have left with external Programming by Disney Channel (Germany) on Fernsehserien.de because I didn't know how I get this clear in the references and they would ask do this because I know my not very well. Are located on this current, planned and run series by 2014, of which I have also that with the program. Erik-Knecht (talk) 16:38, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Erik-Knecht, and welcome to Wikipedia! You appear to be more familiar with German; did you know there is a German Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:43, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Erik-Knecht und willkommen bei Wikipedia! Ich vermute, dass du Deutsch sprichst; weißt Du schon, dass es auch eine deutschsprachige Wikipedia gibt? Vielleicht möchtest du dich ja lieber dort beteiligen. Trotzdem herzlich willkommen und vielen Dank für deine Bemühungen Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:43, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Ahecht

Yes I know of the German Wikipedia page and I'm also very active in the field of Disney. When I looked at the page of Disney Channel Germany in english much to me that the program list was not updated and have them gebacht for our German state.Erik-Knecht (talk) 19:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Disney Channel

Hello, Ahecht

Yes I know of the German Wikipedia page and I'm also very active in the field of Disney. When I looked at the page of Disney Channel Germany in english much to me that the program list was not updated and have them gebacht for our German state.Erik-Knecht (talk) 19:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

100.2.24.137

Just FYI, if you get a vandal coming back so soon after a block, there's no need to warn them again, just report them to AIV. And if you get a silly admin who declines he report, just ping my talk page an I'll block them. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:08, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Mitchell. I figured I'd post the warnings as I was reverting since it had been more than 24 hours (and I was putting together an AIV report when you beat me to it with your block). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:16, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

It's Harry I hate being addressed by my surname! and you're welcome. They were on my watchlist from the last block. If it's clearly the same person, I have no qualms about blocking them without further warning (though other admins might if it's more than few days since the block expired). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Noodles & Co

You need to explain on the article's talk page what violates NPOV if you add a tag. Dougweller (talk) 12:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

NetTradeX article edit

I've read an article about MetaTrader 4 and I'd like to add an article about NetTradeX. If you consider anything in the text to be promotion please let me know and correct it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skarsu (talk • contribs) 14:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Please don't censor other people's posts

I am entitled to my opinion about artistic quality of an artist (as long as it is not in article text), and this has nothing to do with wikipedia's policies about personal attacks. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Staszek Lem, yes, you are entitled to your opinion, but an AfD discussion is a place to discuss the notability, not the quality, of the subject. To quote WP:PA: "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor." You weren't calling the article lousy, you were calling the artist lousy. Even if you argue that this wasn't a personal attack, it was undeniably an ad hominem argument, which should be avoided. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:31, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Well, first, the artist was not a contributor to wikipedia, so he is out of the scope of our policies. Second, the expression "lousy artist" refers to his professional qualities, not his personal traits, so again, it is not a personal attack, nor an ad hominem. Third, artist's poor quality casts a reasonable doubt as to his notability, hence direct relevance to AfD. If you disagree and can prove that it is a good artist using independent sources, then the article will survive, right? (And addressing a common mis-argument: no, I don't have a burden of proof that he is bad/nonnotable artist; if you don't know why, you have to read some wikipedia articles about logical fallacies. ) Staszek Lem (talk) 00:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Bad art can be notable, Staszek Lem. I'm not necessarily saying that this artist is notable (and I don't believe he is), but notability does not necessarily depend on quality. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 01:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

In 98% it does. Please notice that I partially agreed with your assessment of my comment, namely the wording was unnecessarily insulting, so I recast them in a neutral way. Still, I stand for my opinion that falsifiable statements in any discussion pages are useful for discussion. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Noah

Hi there! I understand the reasoning for your edit reversion, but please take some time to see this. Pikolas (talk) 18:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Hey

I found out at Orlando Theme Park News that the Seven Dwarfs Mine Train will open on May 2nd.

75.37.24.45 (talk) 15:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

@75.37.24.45: Thanks. I looked at that source, and unless there is an article other than this one, I'm not seeing a statement that the ride will officially open that day. There is a media event to allow "select media" to "learn more" about the Seven Dwarfs Mine Train, but the advisory doesn't say if/when the ride will actually open to the public. I'll add info on the press event to the article, but leave the opening date as it is for now. The Disney Parks Blog was still saying "later this spring" as of yesterday. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ryanair Pilot Group (RPG), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael O'Leary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

can I continue editing this page(Eglise du Christianisme Celeste- International Youth Fellowship) in the sandbox? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Live.philips (talk • contribs) 13:17, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

can I continue editing this page(Eglise du Christianisme Celeste- International Youth Fellowship) in the sandbox? Thank you --Live.philips (talk) 13:22, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

• @Live.philips: Yes, although note that if the organization or club is not notable, no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 13:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amaifeke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igbo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Accidental Bowel Leakage

Is there anyway we can chat? I need advice on how to promote ABL instead of FI.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jray2281 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

@Jray2281: All but one of your sources in your article referred to it as Fecal Incontinence, not Accidental Bowel Leakage. You would need reliable sources that establish that Accidental Bowel Leakage is notable separately from Fecal Incontinence. Otherwise, the ABL info could be a subsection of the FI article. Sources like this one seem to indicate that ABL is just a marketing term for FI. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:10, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List and Index Society page

I thought I was starting this in my sandbox. I was just getting started. You can delete it if you want. Catherine E M Glover (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Octavius Fryar

Hello. I saw that you warned User:Octavius Fryar. As you probably saw, I have warned him two other times for vandalizing Thomas Built Buses. Another user warned him just before you did tonight as well. It's not his first time, and probably won't be his last! Corkythehornetfan^(talk) 01:22, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

@Corkythehornetfan: Yeah, I saw that. I warned him using Huggle, which for some reason didn't pick up the earlier warnings. I'll keep that editor on my watchlist. Thanks. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 01:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

No problem! Corkythehornetfan^(talk) 01:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Super Underwear Man

I took the liberty of adding List of current SUM Productions comic books to the deletion nomination for the above article, you may want to comment (or slap my wrist if I've been out of line)TheLongTone (talk) 18:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Casino Knokke presents: Beyoncé Live!

Hello Ahecht! I see that you nominated Casino Knokke presents: Beyoncé Live! for deletion. The article most definitely qualities for speedy deletion, as a hoax. I have thus tagged the article accordingly. Cheers, — Status (talk · contribs) 01:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

thanks

Hi, thanks for that welcome message! i'm going to stay and edit wikepedia.

KatnissEverdeen222 (talk) 13:08, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Deleted New Depth

Hi,

im kinda confused why you deleted the new depth article I wrote. all of its content told the truth.

can you please help me understanding the delete, because I really want to make this public.

thanks and sorry for my english, im german ;)

paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulheine (talk • contribs) 09:07, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

@Paulheine: Wikipedia only contains articles about things that are notable. There are many things that are true, but that aren't notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia. You can review WP:GNG for more information on how notability is determined. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 12:40, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	thanks for the help Brabnaba (talk) 22:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryanair Pilot Group (RPG)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ryanair Pilot Group (RPG), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

As I said of the talk page, I am not the original author of this article (I found it while browsing New Pages Feed), but I did restore it from a speedy deletion (without prejudice against an AfD nomination) because I didn't feel that it was unambiguously promotional enough for a WP:G11 speedy delete. As G11 states, "If a subject is notable and the content can be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." It seemed like there was enough coverage to at least make this to AfD on notability grounds rather than a speedy delete. I removed the one section that was a copyvio and added the sources that I could find on a quick google search, and I invite the original authors to expand the article once they create a username that meets wikipedia policies if they can avoid WP:POV and neutrality issues. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Ahect. I'm reviewing the article due its listing at WP:SCV. Unfortunately, in recreating an article that was deleted without attribution, you are in violation of the copyright of the original contributor. :/ Content on Wikipedia is not public domain, although it is very liberally licensed. The license does require attribution. If you restore content to Wikipedia that has been deleted, you must either restore the history of the article or otherwise attribute by the contributor name. Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia explains a little more about the issue. I'll repair the attribution here, but please be sure to attribute fully if restoring or moving content in future. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Genre: New Depth

hi,

so I got your point but otherwise I don't know what to do. new depth is a music genre. any kind of music genre is on Wikipedia so why not new depth? if I post something in a forum and tell everyone of new depth and mark it as a quote in wiki will it be enough?

im really sorry for asking again, I just don't get why there must be a proof, that this exists. there are a lot of genres, just known by a some people, but enough for having an article on wiki.

please tell me what to do, to get new depth in wiki. and: is it completely deleted, cause it took me a hour to translate everything. can I find the deleted version somewhere?

thanks, paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulheine (talk • contribs) 08:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

@Paulheine: I understand your frustration. One of the fundamental standards of Wikipedia is that it is a collection of only verifiable information. If there aren't reliable sources (and a blog or message board post isn't a reliable source) that establish the notability of the subject, it may simply be too soon for it to have a Wikipedia article. Per WP:NOT#OR, a subject is not notable enough to be an article until multiple, independent, and reliable secondary sources report on it. You can request to have the deleted article emailed to you or moved to your user space at WP:UNDELETE. Once there are reliable sources to back up the article, you are more than welcome to resubmit it. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 08:41, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Brabnaba

Hi I have been trying to upload some pictures on to my user page but it is not letting me. I have tried everything and the pictures are of my own creation so can you help me out in that. Bronson Naylor 22:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC) comment added by Bronson Naylor (talk • contribs)

@Brabnaba: Pictures aren't uploaded to specific pages, they get uploaded either to wikipedia at WP:File Upload Wizard or to wikimedia commons at Commons:Special:UploadWizard. Note that pictures should only be uploaded to either of those two places if they could be realistically useful for an educational purpose (this generally means no snapshots of yourself or friends and family). Once the file has been uploaded to one of those places, you can add it to your user page by following the instructions at WP:PIC. If you have any more questions, you can feel free to ask at WP:HELPDESK or Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:42, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Report

Brabnaba has sent me a disturbing award that says I should go O.D. on a brownie and die can you warn him not to do that or block him. Stiler51 (talk) 22:46, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

@Stiler51 I removed that from your talk page and warned Brabnaba. I'm not an adminsitrator here, so if you have any further issues you can raise them at WP:AIV. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

@Stiler51 I also noticed that you provoked bradnaba by spamming his talk page with a bunch of inapplicable barnstars right before he posted that. Talk pages should be used for the discussion of Wikipedia content and editing and shouldn't be used as a social networking site. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

User_talk:Kieron98

I saw too late that you had warned them. I don't think anyone should be expected to deal with that level of discourse, and I've seen 13 year olds talking about penises with more maturity. Hope you don't mind that I didn't see you. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

No problem Panyd. Thanks for taking care of it. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

First Time

Greetings, I just wanted to know that My Pizza place exists physically and on internet there's no intention to advertise Fresco's Pizza Page on Wikipedia. I'm first time using Wiki as a author, So please guide me how to put-up my page on Wiki without violating any of your policies. Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaxy2504 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

@Kaxy2504: Welcome to Wikipedia. Despite being an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. All articles on Wikipedia must be about subjects that are notable, which means that they have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article. Unfortunately, most small businesses do not meet these general notability guidelines and should not have their own articles on Wikipedia. For more information, I would recommend reading Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations, or if you have more questions about getting started editing on Wikipedia you can visit the Teahouse. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Gogh's Assassination page issue

Sir, for what the page is removed. Why sir? Sir the article can be maintained by adding the page in Theo's article as () on murder section. Tell me sir, Mahatma Gandhi too assassinated but article has its page of Mahatma's assassination. Merged that page also to only Mahatma Gandhi. Sir Gogh's assassination was main issue try to understand please i beg you 42.104.2.216 (talk) 18:26, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

@42.104.2.216: The initial move was reverted because it was not properly attributed and therefore a copyright violation. Once a move is reverted, it should be discussed on the article's talk page at Talk:Theo van Gogh (film director) and a consensus for a move should be reached before recreating the move. You can click here to create a new topic on the talk page to discuss splitting the murder section to its own article. If a consensus has been formed to proceed with the move then the new article can be created. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:35, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Article: Network-based rating models in sports

Dear Sir,

Thanks so much for your reviewing my page. I found some of your observations useful since I am a new user of Wiki. However some parts of your comments regarding the possibility of removal of the page are not clear for me yet and I would kindly ask you to explain if you have time.

Your comments were: "This seems more like a literature review than a proper article. The notability of this subject isn't established by third-party sources, and none of these rating models are used by leagues or the media. The only references are the three research papers that the article is summarizing plus a fourth research paper cited in one of the three."

My comments are: 1. indeed these rating models are not used yet actually in leagues or media however one must acknowledge their existence and that was the role of the mini article. In the field of network science however there is specific interest for this kind of rating models. 2.I added some more references and also tried to improve the article by adding the lead section it missed. Does it have chances for reconsideration?

Thank you so much for your time.

Best regards Ottavia00 (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

@Ottavia00: This should be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Network-based_rating_models_in_sports, not on my talk page. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:31, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Article 'Marie Robbins' Deletion

You have deleted the article for Marie Robbins. Why? Its perfectly legitimate for a candidate in an election to be on wikipedia, is it not? There is plenty of precedence for this... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brother.seeker (talk • contribs) 15:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

@Brother.seeker: Although I nominated it for deletion, the article was deleted by NawlinWiki and Anthony Bradbury. Just being a candidate doesn't make someone notable, they must still meet the standards laid out in WP:N and WP:GNG. Generally, candidates for local elections are not notable enough for inclusion on wikipedia unless they get significant coverage by news media from outside the area the person represents or governs or there is other independent coverage sufficient to meet WP:N on their own (for example, mainstream candidates for the head of a national government or candidates that are already notable separately from the election like Arnold Schwarzenegger or Clay Aiken). See WP:POLITICIAN and WP:POLOUTCOMES. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

You recently deleted the article for Marie Robbins and I would like to understand why. Reading through wikipedia's guidelines it seems to be perfectly normal for electoral candidates to have an article. There is lots of precedence and existing articles about candidates so I would be interested to understand why this article in particular has been singled out and what needs to be changed for it to remain.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brother.seeker (talk • contribs) 15:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

@Brother.seeker: No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. If she is just a candidate, it may be too soon for inclusion on wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. Also see WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Ghetto latte#Requested move

Hello Ahecht. This move discussion found a consensus to redirect the article. Recently you added new material at Latte to serve as a target for the redirect from Ghetto latte. Now that I look at Latte I see that 'bootleg latte' is mentioned twice. Maybe you want to look at the target article and see if you want to combine those sections. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:49, 24 May 2014 (UTC)