User talk:Agunderson

This user is a student editor in University_of_Chicago/Violence_in_the_Early_Years_PPHA_35245_(Winter) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Agunderson, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Youth suicide has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Youth suicide was changed by Agunderson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907249 on 2018-01-20T21:05:34+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes[edit]

Hi Agunderson, Madtoups, I wanted to give the two of you a quick note. In general this looks good - my main note would be to be careful of how things are phrased. By this I mean be careful to avoid things that could sound like an opinion or have too much of a paper/essay style to them. For example, with statements like "it is difficult" and "it is important" (ie, who thinks it's difficult or important?), attribute them to the person/organization/publication who made the claim in the source. This can often help resolve the above concerns. Offhand everything looks good and that seems to be the only major thing to point out at this time. Good job! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:42, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]