User talk:AgentPsyops
AgentPsyops, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi AgentPsyops! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC) |
September 2014[edit]
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Jat people. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. If you have a look at the talk page, you'll be able to find productive discussions between Sitush and Syanee before the user left Wikipedia due to health issues. Please stop your disruptive edits. NQ talk 18:44, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
i get frustrated that time he is putting lies down on the article Bayly has been shown unreliable since many other source contradict her, but still sitush and is buddy flower who also is rajistan keep adding backward-caste claim, and not mention the jatt filed legal fight on the state to get backward class status so they have equal rights in getting public jobs. nothing of this is mentioned, he even removed the claim which was challenged, and he has reverted it back to the controversial one. many tribal ppl on this website making lofty claims of their own baste and abusing others. we speak the truth and proofs are there, dont do these abuse on these articles I can find sources which say the world is flat, or that the moon landing is fake, shall i give them full mention in the header of article and claim that is most reliable? because this is what he is doing on this article. He is giving weight to fringe claim of Baylys which has been shown to be weak by other sources.
Discretionary sanctions on caste articles[edit]
|
The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. |