User talk:Afs.rnoru9

July 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Knitsey. I noticed that you recently removed content from Issyk inscription without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Knitsey (talk) 14:38, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will explain in more detail Afs.rnoru9 (talk) 14:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Issyk_inscription#Vandalism_under_the_banner_of_racist_ideology Afs.rnoru9 (talk) 14:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the talk page link. I have replied their. Knitsey (talk) 15:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proto-Indo-European homeland[edit]

This is crap. If you want to contribute to this topic, please use WP:RS, not blogs from people pushing Indigenous Aryanism. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 03:43, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok;

Thanks Afs.rnoru9 (talk) 18:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 03:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]