User talk:Abi-Maria/Archive 1

Abi-Maria, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Abi-Maria!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 29 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Poison (Rita Ora song) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Request

Hey! I loved your edits on Rita Ora's recent single, Poison. What caught my attention was your inclusion of two new charts, Euro Digital Songs and Mexican airplay. Since you seem to have access to Billboard Biz, I was wondering if you could investigate if the song I Will Never Let You Down appeared on similar charts between May and August 2014, especially in Europe. Charts that haven't been listed in the article and can only be found on Billboard biz website, such as Euro Digital Songs or Greece/Luxembourg/Portugal/etc Digital Songs. Only if you have time or desire to do it, of course! Thanks in advance :-) --78.0.225.4 (talk) 19:26, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Hey there. I'll give a look into it and add in the missing peaks asap! :) Abi-Maria (talk) 19:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

THANK YOU! I was curious about I Will Never Let You Down digital peak in Europe, and I really appreciate you took time to add and correct the charts, even for other songs! Honestly, you're a pretty amazing editor. ;-) --78.0.225.4 (talk) 21:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

No problem. :) It's great that you're showing interest in her articles, please keep it up! Abi-Maria (talk) 22:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Hey, can you also check if songs Poison and Black Widow charted on Greece or Portugal Digital Songs? And did Black Widow, Doing It and Ora's new song, Body on Me, appear on Euro Digital songs? --93.138.35.35 (talk) 20:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

I've added everything now. Only "Black Widow" has charted on Greece Digital Songs of Ora's singles. Nothing has charted on Portugal/Luxembourg Digital Songs. I've added the Euro Digital Songs peaks for "Black Widow" and "Doing It", "Body on Me" is yet to chart. I've also added other peaks; Mexico Airplay for "Black Widow", and Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Digital Songs for "New York Raining". Abi-Maria (talk) 13:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hey!! Did her song "Body on Me" appeared on the Euro Digital chart? --78.0.198.228 (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hands to Myself, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penthouse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Okay, please get off your high horse and stop removing my edits just because you haven't made them. Don't know where to reply to you but i'm doing it here lol. Clearly "Hands To Myself" has been released as a single and if you google selena gomez it's clear to see it is so please stop removing my edits, thanks mate. Tobydrew8 (talk) 14:00, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Tobydrew8 You are delusional. The release date of the music video DOES NOT equal = the release date of the single. The single's release date would be its radio impact date or the date its digitally released separately from the album. Get it through your head. Abi-Maria (talk) 14:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Mate, if you read the news articles, it's from her latest single lmao, piss off and do something better with your life than editing a page because you think you know everything. There is cover art and Selena has stated it's now a single. Tobydrew8 (talk) 14:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Tobydrew8 You clearly don't know how Wikipedia works. Go read WP:BURDEN. Please cite these sources you claim that the SINGLE was released on December 21, 2015. Abi-Maria (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

I have been cite the source but you keep reverting my edit lol good game. Get your facts right before thinking you know everything. Tobydrew8 (talk) 14:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC) You cannot have a music video and have the song to buy without it being a single, lol. Selena has stated several times that Hands To Myself is the third single and I have provided that in my ref's but you keep removing them. Tobydrew8 (talk) 15:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Tobydrew8 Yes it is the third single but there's no release date yet, you are making it up from the release date of the music video. I have reported you as many editors have explained this to you and have reverted you and you still carry on. Abi-Maria (talk) 15:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Selena has stated to several media outlets and even her Facebook cover photo confirms the single is out. Leave my edit and my cites thanks. Tobydrew8 (talk) 15:43, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

top 10

Hi. Just to point this:

• "But adjacent quantities not comparable should usually be in different formats: twelve 90-minute volumes or 12 ninety-minute volumes, not 12 90-minute volumes or twelve ninety-minute volumes."

Fouth and top-ten are not comparable quantities, since they are not in the same plane. Top-ten is a subject, referring to the upper side of the chart, while fourth is the times she has reached that spot. Btw, I always find top 20/top 10. Rarely 'top-twenty' like that. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out! Apologies for the revert! Abi-Maria (talk) 05:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Abi-Maria. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ariana Grande - Everyday.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ariana Grande - Everyday.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

It Ain't Me

Please make sure that when you are making date formats consistent in an article you're editing that you don't also change the date parameter of the Scotland and/or UK single chart templates. They need to stay in YYYY-MM-DD format, otherwise they do not correctly link to the OCC archive. Thank you. Ss112 21:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Also, I saw that on the article, you changed the credit in the infobox back to "Kygo & Selena Gomez". Per WP:AMPERSAND, we don't use an ampersand unless it is part of the title of the work or the collective/artist's name (as in Dimitri Vegas & Like Mike). As Kygo and Gomez are two separate artists, we should use "and". Ss112 21:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Your recent editing history at One Last Time (Ariana Grande song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Stop making unexplained changes and edit warring (121.219.136.184 (talk) 00:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC))

A word (or more) of friendly advice

You are within your right to ask another editor to stay off your talk page, especially if they are being abusive. However if you are involved in ongoing content disputes with that editor it makes it very hard to reach an agreement if you aren't communicating. I strongly suggest that you find some way of resolving this w/o resorting to the drama boards. Unless I've missed something, always a possibility, this looks like a run of the mill content dispute, so ANI is probably not where you want to go with this. However, if you are at loggerheads, and you are having trouble reaching consensus on a specific chart's acceptability as a source, then I'd suggest finding the best place to have that discussion and posting a WP:RFC while alerting the relevant wiki-projects on their talk pages. Be careful that any notice is worded in a matter of fact and neutral manner, i.e. "There is currently a discussion that may be relevant to the subject of this project at WT:CHARTS. Interested editors are encouraged to (Wikilink:join the discussion)." -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Courtesy ping Ss112. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

P.S. Until consensus is reached I would suggest that both of you avoid editing that would involve adding or removing the chart as a source. Just let things be until consensus is achieved. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Ad Orientem I have started discussions at relevant project pages and hope to see consensus and opinions from other editors, but I doubt it. I also do not believe it is okay that I have to look for second opinions and open discussions with literally nearly all of my edits just because only Ss112 does not agree with them. Is that how I am supposed to edit Wikipedia moving forward, with Ss112 constantly undoing and undermining everything I do? I think It's very unfair and I will take it to WP:ANI if it continues because I cannot carry on editing wikipedia like this. The problem is with Ss112 and from what I can see at the WP:ANI archives, he has had a similar history with several other editors. I have never had an issue with any editor in the 2 years I have been here, but Ss112 has been involved in at least 3 similar squabbles at ANI - it is definitely telling. I would appreciate that you as an admin, give Ss112 some advice that he stop wikihounding and undoing and blatantly questioning every single edit I make to bait an edit war. And it is definitely wikihounding- I can provide more than enough diffs to make a very legitimate case at ANI. Abi-Maria (talk) 15:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

I am not suggesting that you stop editing. I am suggesting that you don't carry out edits that touch on the issue currently in contention until consensus is reached. Until then, unilateral editing in a manner that reflects your view of this dispute is probably going to be unconstructive at best. And I am making the same request of Ss112. There are lots of areas where improvements can be made to the project while temporarily avoiding making edits that involve this particular issue. And yes, I do believe consensus is possible. As I mentioned, an RfC may be needed but in the end we will reach a conclusion about the acceptability of the chart. While you are free to take your disagreement with Ss112 to ANI, I can only note that in my experience it is not the best place to resolve differences. The unhappy fact is that you and Ss112 have similar interests and are editing pages that likely are on both your watchlists. Both of you need to be sensitive to this reality. Thank you for your forbearance. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Abi-Maria. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Abi-Maria. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Abi-Maria. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Selena Gomez - Same Old Love.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Selena Gomez - Same Old Love.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kygo Selena Gomez It Aint Me.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kygo Selena Gomez It Aint Me.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Selena Gomez - Hands to Myself single cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Selena Gomez - Hands to Myself single cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)