User talk:AaronRichard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Greetings[edit]

Hello, just noticed your edits pop up on my watchlist. What kind of teaching do you do? Primary, secondary? I ask because I'm currently considering doing a Dip Ed. and teaching secondary history. --Cnwb 02:09, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AaronRichard,

I recently translated the article about Christian Worch from the German-language wikipedia and I was wondering wether you could check over it and fix mistakes.--Carabinieri 18:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL if you love your footy, and also Category:VFL/AFL players. Drop us a line with any questions mate. Cheers, Rogerthat Talk 07:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amateur AFL teams[edit]

Hello AaronRichard. Good work on all those AFL teams. Recently, North Carolina Tigers was put on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Carolina Tigers by myself, with the result being to merge the team to its respective league - United States Australian Football League, on the grounds that the performance and competition level is not of first-class standard, although the leagues in themselves are of interest. At the time I wrote a rather large discussion, indicating that the AfD could be a litmus-test or precedent for similar AFL teams and I would like to see what people think about this, as to I (or someone else) should go ahead and merge them, without sending a whole pile to AfD. I have posted this at WP:AWNB and WP:AFL and would appreciate some feedback.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFL - Aussie rules outside Australia[edit]

Hi Aaron, remember when you join the WP:AFL project, tou may propose any new articles or coverage you feel is appropriate. I am not knowledgable on the amateur leagues outside Australia, but perhaps with some of your work you could add a list of tasks to the project page and then use that as a place for the whole International aussie rules community to discuss ideas. Your thoughts? Rogerthat Talk 09:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Eucuplogo.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eucuplogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Germanblackeagles.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Germanblackeagles.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Germanblackeagles.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Germanblackeagles.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:16, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pafleagles.gif[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pafleagles.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bristoldockers.gif[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bristoldockers.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 21:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arizona Hawks, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://medlibrary.org/medwiki/Arizona_Australian_Rules_Football_League. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 10:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Asianafl.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Asianafl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somali language[edit]

I see you've been working hard on the Somali language article. However, you need to be aware that there are standards for language articles. They should follow the structure given in the template. Please could you rearrange the information so that it once again conforms to this? You also need to know that for linguists it is very important that the spoken language is separated from the written language. This article is about the language rather than the writing system, so the history section should focus on the history of the language, not of the writing system. Best wishes Gailtb (talk) 09:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logouffa.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logouffa.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Swedishelks.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Swedishelks.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Southafricanlions.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Southafricanlions.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wgrlogo.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wgrlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stockholmdynamitelogo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stockholmdynamitelogo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Coat of arms of tayshet.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of tayshet.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Edinburgh Bloods requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 09:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Atka, Magadan Oblast, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 10:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Footy jumpers[edit]

You've been doing some good work with these, but with the Ballarat Football League, you gave Darley the wrong jumper. Along with that, it's better to leave the same size logos there. If you present different sizes it looks unprofessional and therefore unencyclopaedic. Footy Freak7 (talk) 23:19, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Werribeecentralsjumper.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust Talk Contribs 02:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ovens and Murray Jumpers[edit]

I'm leaving a note to thank you for fixing the club list on the Ovens and Murray Football League page and putting the proper jumpers in, I was thinking I should fix that section when I was cleaning the text up a month or so ago but got distracted by life again. Hopefully none of them will get nixed by the logo police. :) Graham (talk) 00:28, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fortescue National Football League[edit]

I don't know whether you are stretching notability a bit, a couple of Rio Tinto employees kicking the ball around on the weekend in Tom Price and Para! You're shure this passes Wikipedia:Notability? Calistemon (talk) 13:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • To be honest, I'm not sure that it does, but at the moment we're operating on a standard that each of the WAFL/SANFL/VFL etc affiliated local footy leagues has an article. I'm not going to worry too much about developing that particular article too extensively though. The WikiProject WA and WikiProject AFL I think both assessed it as "low" importance, which means it scrapes in for the time being at least. AaronRichard (talk) 21:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Its a registered and affiliated senior football competition, its deserves to by respected Purrum (talk) 22:30, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not of the deletionist fraction on Wikipedia so I certainly won't nominate it for AFD but I doupt that it passes Wikipedia:GNG, meaning sufficent coverage in independent media. Being regustered and affiliated is not a criteria for notability, most sports and sporting competition are registered with a governing authority, that alone doesn't make them notable I have to say. The rough divide seems to be whether a competition is fully professional or not, but if there is a resonable media coverage for amateur competitions it makes them notable, too. If somebody else came around, and put an AFD on it your good work would probably have all been wasted unless you can come up with some independednt, reliable sources, like newspapers. Calistemon (talk) 01:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I found one nws source in The West Australian, which is a start. Calistemon (talk) 02:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, country footy leagues generally do get substantial coverage in local independent media, plus they generally get some token coverage in statewide media. I haven't seen any of the articles on SA/Vic/WA leagues tagged for deletion at any point so far. Also, I've seen quite a few articles on Wikipedia covering non- or semi-professional leagues in other sporting codes. For the moment we'll leave it.AaronRichard (talk) 11:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't get me wrong, I'm just trying to point out something to you. There is plenty of amateur sport articles here and I wish there was more but current guidlines are pretty prohibitive. There is something of a notion on Wikipedia that professonal=notable, amateur=non-notable. I have seen plenty of articles in rugby union and soccer articles deleted because they were deemed non-notable, believe me. The point I'm making is that if there is plenty of coverage, even if only in local papers and off-line, than some of it will have to be added to prove notability. In their current state the articles don't fullfil that requirement and are vulnerable. The saving grace is that few outside of Australia have heared of AFL and it doesn't get much negative attention because of that. Other sports do! Calistemon (talk) 11:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Lebediny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aldan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HarmanDesign.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HarmanDesign.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.[edit]

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis[1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=22768821 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 08:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 08:13, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Victorian Goldfields Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Melbourne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Research Participation Barnstar
For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:31, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ed Skrein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piggy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Summaries[edit]

Could you please add an edit summary for each and every contribution you make to Wikipedia? It isn't too difficult and it is useful in a variety of ways. - Shiftchange (talk) 08:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. AaronRichard (talk) 11:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26[edit]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 04:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brest, France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diwan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages[edit]

Hey Aaron, just noticed your copying of the content of Crater to Coast Rail Trail to a new page Camperdown-Timboon Rail Trail. First - thanks for doing this, I hadn't realised that "Crater to Coast" was a future name only. For future reference though, you should use the "Move Page" function (it's in the drop down menu to the right of View history). The difference is, moving the page properly retains the full history of the page, including previous edits. Creating a new page and copying the content breaks the history, and is iffy from a copyright point of view... Anyway, for next time. :) Stevage 02:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Stevage, sorry, didn't realise! Will make sure not to make that mistake next time. Regards the name "Crater to Coast", I think from memory they WERE using that as the name for a while, including on the Railtrails Australia website itself, but the latest brochures and whatnot seem to all be calling it Camperdown-Timboon Rail Trail again. Not sure why the change back.AaronRichard (talk) 05:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Heh - I actually help manage the Rail Trails Australia site. It's not definitive - it's more a question of RTA trying to keep up with what the local management committee decides, rather than vice versa. Stevage 03:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Verkhnyaya Amga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aldan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Susumansky District may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ], [[Kontrandya]], [[Maldyak]], [[Neksikan]], [[Ozyornoye, Magadan Oblast|Ozyornoye]], [[Udarnik (Magadan Oblast|Udarnik]], [[Ust-Khakchan]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ust-Srednekan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seymchan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Churapchinsky District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Selo and Tolon
Amginsky District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Selo
Iyengra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Selo
Uluu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Selo
Ust-Maysky District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Selo
Ust-Yansky District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Selo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Artyk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nera River
Megino-Kangalassky District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Selo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Olenyoksky District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Olenyok
Saskylakh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Olenyok
Zhigansk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ostrog

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lensky District, Sakha Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tolon and Yaroslavsky
Mirninsky District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tunguska River
Olenyoksky District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Olenyok
Saskylakh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Olenyok
Svetly, Sakha Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Evenk
Zhigansk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ostrog

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sakha Republic Edits[edit]

Hi Aaron, Good to see someone else involved in creating articles for the far east of Russia, it has given me impetus to get back to some myself. Saw you have been creating some articles for settlements that are no specifically covered by the 2010 census such as Yuryung-Khaya. Not sure if you are aware, but the population figures given here are for the national nasleg, not specifically for the village itself. As with a lot of villages in Chukotka, where I have been editing, often the village is the only settlement in the nasleg, so it is fine per WP:COMMONSENSE to assume nasleg population = village population, though it is worth checking here on the official Sakha Republic website where there are links to each district. I have added an explanatory note which I have been using in my Chukotka articles as well, which clarifies things and which you can transplant to any other articles you think appropriate. Fenix down (talk) 16:30, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aaron, I note that you added some settlements to the tables I had produced. I think at Anabarsky District, there was some confusion between the municipal district organisation which has jurisdiction over 2 settlements according to the source and the administrative district that has jurisdiction over three. Confusing, eh?! All districts have an administrative and municipal equivalent which do not necessarily look after the same area, for example Chaunsky District, which has a strange arrangement whereby it municipally has jurisdiction over a small settlement several hundred km from the administrative district boundary. I have clarified the district article to differentiate between the two types. I think you were right with the addition to Allaikhovsky District, although according to the source, it was unpopulated in the 2002 census. Fenix down (talk) 08:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:CEAFL.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thames Valley Magpies for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thames Valley Magpies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thames Valley Magpies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 08:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thames Valley Magpies for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thames Valley Magpies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thames Valley Magpies (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 11:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yakutian Railway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Compassionate727 (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wimbledon Hawks for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wimbledon Hawks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wimbledon Hawks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 03:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Southyarrafootballclub.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Southyarrafootballclub.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinese people in East Timor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Canton, Sunda and Batavia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, AaronRichard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion[edit]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bunwurrung language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lang Lang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bunwurrung language
added a link pointing to Buln Buln
Gunai language
added a link pointing to Moe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McLemore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gilmour. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, AaronRichard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AaronRichard. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Peter Whish-Wilson (tubist), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Peter Whish-Wilson (tubist) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Peter Whish-Wilson (tubist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://awscdn.australianmusiccentre.com.au/documents/att_670.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mighty Glen (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, AaronRichard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, AaronRichard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Niko Schäuble has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 09:32, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Port Lincoln Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:20, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Help copy edit and improvements for article. Thanks you. 58.187.77.36 (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinrich Stölzel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harmonic series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article North London Lions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG, lacks any sources or references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wgrlogo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wgrlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fork99 (talk) 05:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Werribeecentralsjumper.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Werribeecentralsjumper.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]